Participatory curriculum development: Lessons drawn from teaching environmental education to industry in Zimbabwe

2004 ◽  
Vol 10 (3) ◽  
pp. 401-407 ◽  
Author(s):  
Leigh Price
1984 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 11-13 ◽  
Author(s):  
I.M. Robottom

At the inaugural national conference of the Australian Association for Environmental Education in Adelaide (October, 1980), it was clear that multiple interpretations existed of the key descriptor ‘environmental education’. At that conference, at earlier international conferences (e.g., Tbilisi, 1977) and in recent Australian curriculum materials (e.g., The Curriculum Development Centre's (CDC's) Environmental Education Project), the terms education about the environment, education in the environment, and education for the environment were and have been used to capture the various interpretations of environmental education. An explication of these terms is offered in the Environmental Education Project (CDC, 1981), and in Fensham (1979).These terms seems to embrace the various facets to emerge in discourse about environmental education — they can, perhaps, be taken as representing the accepted dimensions of environmental education.


1984 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 25-27 ◽  
Author(s):  
I. Robottom

For many schools, environmental education constitutes a curriculum innovation in that it represents a challenge to existing teaching and curriculum practice. An innovation issue frequently neglected in environmental education is the spread of messages about the innovation within and between schools. This neglect is often apparent in the case of environmental education materials developed at sites away from the school. In such cases, great care is taken to develop a useful curriculum resource, and to distribute it from central development site to school classrooms. For example, when the Curriculum Development Centre (CDC) produced its recent environmental education materials, the Environmental Education Project, it sought to disseminate the innovation by fostering sales through such strategies as the mailing of promotional leaflets to all schools, conducting state and national launchings, providing cost-free review copies to subject associations and the like, and advertisements. However, the exchange of ideas about the innovation from practising teacher to practising teacher is more difficult to organise from outside the school.


1996 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 25-37 ◽  
Author(s):  
Harold R. Hungerford

Although this article should not be considered a research article, its content is based almost entirely on research into responsible environmental behavior. It looks at instructional practice in environmental education and some of the flaws associated with it. The research that guides successful curriculum development and instruction is briefly discussed, and inferences flowing from that research are stated and described. The article then describes what the author believes to be the critical educational components that must be in place if receivers are to become lifelong responsible decision makers in society. Following this is a discussion of what an instructional program would look like that can be predicted to lead to responsible citizenship action regarding important environmental issues.


2017 ◽  
Vol 25 ◽  
pp. 5-13 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mary Sidebotham ◽  
Caroline Walters ◽  
Janine Chipperfield ◽  
Jenny Gamble

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document