The default and liquidity premia of corporate bonds: evidence from the trade reporting and compliance engine

2020 ◽  
pp. 1-6
Author(s):  
Yongkil Ahn
2015 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 264-289 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul R.F. van Loon ◽  
Andrew J.G. Cairns ◽  
Alexander J. McNeil ◽  
Alex Veys

AbstractThe liquidity premium on corporate bonds has been high on the agenda of Solvency regulators owing to its potential relationship to an additional discount factor on long-dated insurance liabilities. We analyse components of the credit spread as a function of standard bond characteristics during 2003–2014 on a daily basis by regression analyses, after introducing a new liquidity proxy. We derive daily distributions of illiquidity contributions to the credit spread at the individual bond level and find that liquidity premia were close to zero just before the financial crisis. We observe the time-varying nature of liquidity premia as well as a widening in the daily distribution in the years after the credit crunch. We find evidence to support higher liquidity premia, on average, on bonds of lower credit quality. The evolution of model parameters is economically intuitive and brings additional insight into investors’ behaviour. The frequent and bond-level estimation of liquidity premia, combined with few data restrictions makes the approach suitable for ALM modelling, especially when future work is directed towards arriving at forward-looking estimates at both the aggregate and bond-specific level.


2020 ◽  
Vol 32 (6) ◽  
pp. 347-355
Author(s):  
Mark Wahrenburg ◽  
Andreas Barth ◽  
Mohammad Izadi ◽  
Anas Rahhal

AbstractStructured products like collateralized loan obligations (CLOs) tend to offer significantly higher yield spreads than corporate bonds (CBs) with the same rating. At the same time, empirical evidence does not indicate that this higher yield is reduced by higher default losses of CLOs. The evidence thus suggests that CLOs offer higher expected returns compared to CB with similar credit risk. This study aims to analyze whether this return difference is captured by asset pricing factors. We show that market risk is the predominant risk factor for both CBs and CLOs. CLO investors, however, additionally demand a premium for their risk exposure towards systemic risk. This premium is inversely related to the rating class of the CLO.


CFA Digest ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 41 (4) ◽  
pp. 68-70 ◽  
Author(s):  
Spencer L. Klein
Keyword(s):  

CFA Digest ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 47 (10) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sonia Gandhi
Keyword(s):  

2004 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 31-48 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nagisa Akutsu ◽  
Masaaki Kijima ◽  
Katsuya Komoribayashi

Author(s):  
Robert A. Jarrow ◽  
Haitao Li ◽  
Sheen Liu ◽  
Chunchi Wu
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document