Biological monitoring of exposure to low concentrations of benzene in workers at a metallurgical coke production plant: new insights into S-phenylmercapturic acid and urinary benzene

Biomarkers ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 23 (1) ◽  
pp. 70-77 ◽  
Author(s):  
Piero Lovreglio ◽  
Giuseppe De Palma ◽  
Anna Barbieri ◽  
Roberta Andreoli ◽  
Ignazio Drago ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Biological Monitoring ◽  
Coke Production ◽  
Metallurgical Coke ◽  
Production Plant ◽  
Low Concentrations

Characterization of 58 Species Non-Methane Hydrocarbons from a Typical Coke Production Plant in Northern China

2014 ◽  
Vol 1010-1012 ◽  
pp. 373-376
Author(s):  
Jian Wu Shi ◽  
Hao Deng ◽  
Li Mei Bi ◽  
Xin Yu Han
Keyword(s):  
Mass Spectrometry ◽  
Gas Chromatography ◽  
Aromatic Hydrocarbons ◽  
Loss Rate ◽  
Northern China ◽  
Coke Production ◽  
Gas Chromatography Mass Spectrometry ◽  
Production Plant ◽  
Chamber System

The profile of 58 species non-methane hydrocarbons (NMHCs) emissions from a typical coke production plant in northern China was studied. Source samples were taken using a dilution chamber system and were quantified by a gas chromatography/mass spectrometry (GC/MS) system. Based on the measurement of source profiles, aromatic hydrocarbons were found in highest concentration (48.5%), followed by alkanes (42.9%) and alkenes (8.6%), respectively. The emission of C6-C7species took the largest proportion of the NMHCs, toluene and n-hexane were primary species, accounted for 27.4% and 25.1% of total NMHCs. The OH loss rate of NMHCs were estimated, indicated that alkenes (46.5%) played the most important role in LOH, followed by aromatic hydrocarbons (34.3%) and alkanes (19.2%). The top 5 species in LOHwere: 1-butylene, toluene, n-hexane, trans-2-butene and cis-2-pentene.

Biological monitoring of vehicle mechanics and other workers exposed to low concentrations of benzene

1997 ◽  
Vol 70 (1) ◽  
pp. 29-40 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. Hotz ◽  
P. Carbonnelle ◽  
V. Haufroid ◽  
A. Tschopp ◽  
J. P. Buchet ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Biological Monitoring ◽  
Low Concentrations

CHARCOAL FINES AS AN ADDITIVE IN METALLURGICAL COKE PRODUCTION

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paulo Dornelas ◽  
Alfredo Carlos Bitarães Quintas ◽  
Victor Eric de Souza Moreira ◽  
Natalia Haneiko ◽  
Mauro Silva ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Coke Production ◽  
Metallurgical Coke

Metallurgical coke production with biomass additives. Part 1. A review of existing practices

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-13
Author(s):  
Andrii Koveria ◽  
Lina Kieush ◽  
Olena Svietkina ◽  
Yevhen Perkov
Keyword(s):  
Coke Production ◽  
Metallurgical Coke

Briquetting of carbon-containing wastes from steelmaking for metallurgical coke production

Fuel ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 114 ◽  
pp. 216-223 ◽  
Author(s):  
M.A. Diez ◽  
R. Alvarez ◽  
J.L.G. Cimadevilla
Keyword(s):  
Coke Production ◽  
Metallurgical Coke

scholarly journals Production and quality of blast furnace coke in Ukraine

2007 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 91-96
Author(s):  
Yevgen Kovalov ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Coke Quality ◽  
Coke Production ◽  
Raw Material ◽  
Metallurgical Coke ◽  
Material Base ◽  
Preparation Methods ◽  
Blast Furnace Coke ◽  
Coal Charge ◽  
Furnace Coke

This research displays the state of metallurgical coke production in Ukrainew with special attention to the raw material base for production of coke and its quality. Besides the following essay deals with the detailed analysis of preparation methods of coal charge for coking, including thermal treatment and stamp charging and formulates the main ways of upgrading coke quality considering the rational technology of coking.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document