Hysteretic Behavior of Dual-Self-Centering Variable Friction Damper Braces with Low Pretensioned Force

Author(s):  
Yongwei Wang ◽  
Zhen Zhou ◽  
Lingxin Zhang ◽  
Kunsong Zhao
Author(s):  
Austin Downey ◽  
MohammadKazem Sadoughi ◽  
Liang Cao ◽  
Simon Laflamme ◽  
Chao Hu

Structural control systems, including passive, semi-active and active damping systems, are used to increase structural resilience to multi-hazard excitations. While semi-active and active damping systems have been investigated for the mitigation of multi-hazard excitations, their requirement for real-time controllers and power availability limit their usefulness. This work proposes the use of a newly developed passive variable friction device for the mitigation of multi-hazard events. This passive variable friction device, when installed in a structure, is capable of mitigating different hazards from wind and ground motions. In wind events, the device ensures serviceability, while during earthquake events, the device reduces the building’s inter-story drift to maintain strength-based motion requirements. Results show that the passive variable friction device performs better than a traditional friction damper during a seismic event while not compromising any performance during wind events.


2016 ◽  
Vol 24 (3) ◽  
pp. 159-165
Author(s):  
Ximing Xu ◽  
Maohai Fu ◽  
Zhaoxia Xu ◽  
Zhongyi Chen

2003 ◽  
Vol 2003 (0) ◽  
pp. _716-1_-_716-5_
Author(s):  
Yoshihito SATOH ◽  
Hideya YMAGUCHI

2018 ◽  
Vol 2018 ◽  
pp. 1-18
Author(s):  
Ying-jie Kang ◽  
Ling-yun Peng

To improve the recoverability of structures following an earthquake, a Reid friction damper with self-centering characteristics is proposed and its hysteretic behavior is studied by theoretical analysis and experimental research. The main parameters of the damper are the equivalent stiffness and energy dissipation coefficient. Based on a 10-story steel frame structure, 10 energy dissipation design schemes using the proposed Reid damper are proposed. The additional equivalent damping ratios of the 10 schemes are equal, whereas the energy dissipation coefficients of the dampers are different. The vibration control effects of the energy dissipation structures are analytically investigated under four earthquake loads. The experimental results of the friction damper are in good agreement with the theoretical results, and the hysteretic behavior of the damper follows that of a typical Reid model. The seismic response and structural damage can be reduced using any of the 10 design schemes; however, the effects are different. When the energy dissipation coefficient is in the range of 0.1–0.3, the control effect on the interstory drift is better; however, the structural acceleration response and damping force of the dampers increase. When the energy dissipation coefficient is in the range of 0.6–1.0, the energy dissipation effect of the dampers is good; however, the self-centering ability is poor. Therefore, the optimum range of the energy dissipation coefficient of a Reid damper intended for energy dissipation structures should be 0.3–0.6.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document