Risk factors for the development of local recurrence in extremity soft-tissue sarcoma

Author(s):  
Fabio Tirotta ◽  
Raza Sayyed ◽  
Robin L Jones ◽  
Andrew J Hayes
1994 ◽  
Vol 219 (2) ◽  
pp. 165-173 ◽  
Author(s):  
Samuel Singer ◽  
Joseph M. Corson ◽  
Rene Gonin ◽  
Brian Labow ◽  
Timothy J. Eberlein

2012 ◽  
Vol 52 (4) ◽  
pp. 793-802 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vignesh K. Alamanda ◽  
Samuel N. Crosby ◽  
Kristin R. Archer ◽  
Yanna Song ◽  
Herbert S. Schwartz ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Arvid von Konow ◽  
Iman Ghanei ◽  
Emelie Styring ◽  
Fredrik Vult von Steyern

Abstract Background Approximately 80% of soft tissue sarcoma (STS) recurrences, local and metastatic disease, are diagnosed within the first 3 years after primary diagnosis and treatment. Recurrences, however, can present after a longer period of remission. Our goal was to identify factors that may predict the risk of late recurrence. Methods We identified 677 patients with STS of the extremities and trunk wall from a population-based sarcoma register. Of these, 377 patients were alive and event-free at 3 years and were included for analysis of possible risk factors for late recurrence. Results Fifty-five of 377 (15%) patients developed late recurrence: 23 local recurrence, 21 metastasis, and 11 both manifestations. With R0 wide surgical margin as reference, R0 marginal (hazard ratio [HR] 2.6; p = 0.02) and R1 (HR 5.0; p = 0.005) margins were risk factors for late local recurrence. Malignancy grade (HR 8.3; p = 0.04) and R0 marginal surgical margin (HR 2.3; p = 0.04) were risk factors for late metastasis. We could not find a statistically significant correlation of late recurrence with many of the generally known risk factors for local recurrence and metastasis in STS. Outcome after treatment of late recurrences was better compared with outcome after treatment of early events. Conclusions Late recurrences, albeit relatively rare, do occur. Outcome after treatment was good compared with outcome after early events. Long surveillance of all patients with high-grade STS, especially if R0 wide surgical margin is not achieved in the primary treatment, appear to be well justified.


1999 ◽  
Vol 69 (5) ◽  
pp. 344-349 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. B. Wilson ◽  
P. J. Crowe ◽  
R. Fisher ◽  
C. Hook ◽  
M. J. Donnellan

2003 ◽  
Vol 21 (14) ◽  
pp. 2719-2725 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jürgen Weitz ◽  
Christina R. Antonescu ◽  
Murray F. Brennan

Purpose: The objective of this study was to define whether survival of patients with extremity soft tissue sarcoma (STS), stratified for known risk factors, has improved over the last 20 years. Patients and Methods: From January 1982 to December 2001, 1,706 patients with primary and recurrent STS of the extremities were treated at our institution and were prospectively followed. From this cohort, we selected 1,261 patients who underwent complete macroscopic resection and had one of the following histopathologies: fibrosarcoma, liposarcoma, leiomyosarcoma, malignant fibrous histiocytoma, or synovial sarcoma. Median follow-up was 55 months. Patient, tumor, and treatment factors were analyzed as prognostic factors. Results: The 5-year disease-specific actuarial survival was 79% (78% for patients treated from 1982 to 1986, 79% for patients treated from 1986 to 1991, 79% for patients treated from 1992 to 1996, and 85% for patients treated from 1997 to 2001; P = not significant). For high-risk patients (high-grade, > 10 cm, deep tumors; n = 247), 5-year disease-specific survival was 51% (50% for patients treated from 1982 to 1986, 45% for patients treated from 1986 to 1991, 52% for patients treated from 1992 to 1996, and 61% for patients treated from 1997 to 2001; P = not significant). Tumor depth, size, grade, microscopic margin status, patient age, presentation status (primary tumor versus local recurrence), location (proximal versus distal), and certain histopathologic subtypes were significant prognostic factors for disease-specific survival on multivariate analysis; however, time period of treatment was not. Conclusion: Prognosis of patients with extremity STS, stratified for known risk factors, has not improved over the last 20 years, indicating that current therapy has reached the limits of efficacy.


1997 ◽  
Vol 15 (2) ◽  
pp. 646-652 ◽  
Author(s):  
J J Lewis ◽  
D Leung ◽  
M Heslin ◽  
J M Woodruff ◽  
M F Brennan

PURPOSE The aim of this study was to analyze local recurrence in a large cohort of prospectively followed patients with primary extremity soft tissue sarcoma. In particular, we analyzed the correlation of local recurrence with subsequent metastasis and disease-specific survival. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients who underwent treatment for primary extremity soft tissue sarcoma from July 1982 through July 1995 at Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center were the subject of this study. Local recurrence, distant metastasis, and disease-specific survival were used as end points of the study. The influence of local recurrence on subsequent distant metastasis and disease-specific survival were examined using the Cox proportional hazards model. RESULTS We treated 911 patients, of whom 297 (33%) developed recurrent disease. Local recurrence occurred in 116 patients (13%), metastasis in 167 (18%), and synchronous local recurrence and metastasis in 13 (2%). Of 116 patients who developed local recurrence, 38 subsequently developed metastasis and 34 died of disease. Metastasis after local recurrence was predicted in patients with initial high-grade (P = .005; risk = 3.5) or deep (P = .02; risk = 2.9) tumors. Tumor mortality after local recurrence was predicted in patients with initial high-grade (P = .007; risk = 3.7) or large (> 5 cm; P = .01; risk = 3.2) primary tumors. DISCUSSION These findings suggest that there is a strong association of local recurrence with the development of subsequent metastasis and tumor mortality, and that local recurrence is a poor prognostic factor. It would seem prudent to consider patients who develop local recurrence and have high-grade tumors as being at high risk for systemic disease and therefore eligible for investigational adjuvant systemic therapy.


Cancer ◽  
1990 ◽  
Vol 65 (5) ◽  
pp. 1119-1129 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anne T. Stotter ◽  
R. P. A'Hern ◽  
C. Fisher ◽  
A. F. Mott ◽  
Mary E. Fallowfield ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 45 (2) ◽  
pp. 268-274 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jong Woong Park ◽  
Hye Jin Yoo ◽  
Han-Soo Kim ◽  
Ja-Young Choi ◽  
Hwan Seong Cho ◽  
...  

2010 ◽  
Vol 28 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 10068-10068 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Bonvalot ◽  
A. Dunant ◽  
C. le Pechoux ◽  
P. Terrier ◽  
F. Rimareix ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 96 (5) ◽  
pp. 1157-1174 ◽  
Author(s):  
Whitney M. Guerrero ◽  
Jeremiah L. Deneve

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document