scholarly journals Prognostic Factors Predictive of Survival and Local Recurrence for Extremity Soft Tissue Sarcoma

1994 ◽  
Vol 219 (2) ◽  
pp. 165-173 ◽  
Author(s):  
Samuel Singer ◽  
Joseph M. Corson ◽  
Rene Gonin ◽  
Brian Labow ◽  
Timothy J. Eberlein
1988 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 30-37 ◽  
Author(s):  
Charles F. Collin ◽  
Claudia Friedrich ◽  
James Godbold ◽  
Steven Hajdu ◽  
Murray F. Brennan

2012 ◽  
Vol 52 (4) ◽  
pp. 793-802 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vignesh K. Alamanda ◽  
Samuel N. Crosby ◽  
Kristin R. Archer ◽  
Yanna Song ◽  
Herbert S. Schwartz ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Berrin Inanc, MD ◽  
Kubilay Inanc, MD

Purpose: The purpose of the study was to investigate the prognostic factors and survival after preoperative radiotherapy in Extremity Soft Tissue Sarcomas (ESTS). Materials and Methods: In this retrospective study, all patients treated for an extremity sarcoma with pre-operative radiotherapy followed by surgery. Results: The mean follow-up for all 24 ESTS patients was 15.5 (range: 10-39 months). At last follow-up, 9 patients (37%) were alive, 15 patients (62%) had died of distant disease progression. Among the patients died, there were 15 with metastatic relapse (13 lung and 2 cranial metastasis), 5 with both local and metastatic recurrence. The median OS was 16 month. The 2-years actuarial OS rate and 3-years OS rate were 39% and 26%, respectively. The median RFS was 14(12.5-15.4) month. The 2-years and 3-years RFS rate was 71%.The median MFS was 12 months. The 2-years and 3-years MFS rate were 33%, 17%, respectively. The effects of age, sex, histopathologic type, tumor size, tumor localization, tumor grade, tumor depth, radiation doses and recestion margin on OS, RFS, MFS were not observed. In univariate and multivariate model, it was observed that recurrence decreased OS time significantly (p<0.05). Conclusion: Recurrens and metastasis are strong and negative prognostic factor for survival in extremity soft tissue sarcoma patients.


2014 ◽  
Vol 85 (3) ◽  
pp. 323-332 ◽  
Author(s):  
Katja Maretty-Nielsen ◽  
Ninna Aggerholm-Pedersen ◽  
Akmal Safwat ◽  
Peter Holmberg Jørgensen ◽  
Bjarne H Hansen ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 16 (8) ◽  
pp. 661-666 ◽  
Author(s):  
I. Atean ◽  
Y. Pointreau ◽  
P. Rosset ◽  
P. Garaud ◽  
G. De-Pinieux ◽  
...  

1999 ◽  
Vol 69 (5) ◽  
pp. 344-349 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. B. Wilson ◽  
P. J. Crowe ◽  
R. Fisher ◽  
C. Hook ◽  
M. J. Donnellan

2003 ◽  
Vol 21 (14) ◽  
pp. 2719-2725 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jürgen Weitz ◽  
Christina R. Antonescu ◽  
Murray F. Brennan

Purpose: The objective of this study was to define whether survival of patients with extremity soft tissue sarcoma (STS), stratified for known risk factors, has improved over the last 20 years. Patients and Methods: From January 1982 to December 2001, 1,706 patients with primary and recurrent STS of the extremities were treated at our institution and were prospectively followed. From this cohort, we selected 1,261 patients who underwent complete macroscopic resection and had one of the following histopathologies: fibrosarcoma, liposarcoma, leiomyosarcoma, malignant fibrous histiocytoma, or synovial sarcoma. Median follow-up was 55 months. Patient, tumor, and treatment factors were analyzed as prognostic factors. Results: The 5-year disease-specific actuarial survival was 79% (78% for patients treated from 1982 to 1986, 79% for patients treated from 1986 to 1991, 79% for patients treated from 1992 to 1996, and 85% for patients treated from 1997 to 2001; P = not significant). For high-risk patients (high-grade, > 10 cm, deep tumors; n = 247), 5-year disease-specific survival was 51% (50% for patients treated from 1982 to 1986, 45% for patients treated from 1986 to 1991, 52% for patients treated from 1992 to 1996, and 61% for patients treated from 1997 to 2001; P = not significant). Tumor depth, size, grade, microscopic margin status, patient age, presentation status (primary tumor versus local recurrence), location (proximal versus distal), and certain histopathologic subtypes were significant prognostic factors for disease-specific survival on multivariate analysis; however, time period of treatment was not. Conclusion: Prognosis of patients with extremity STS, stratified for known risk factors, has not improved over the last 20 years, indicating that current therapy has reached the limits of efficacy.


2012 ◽  
Vol 4 (4) ◽  
pp. 34 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ingmar Ipach ◽  
Tobias Wingert ◽  
Beate Kunze ◽  
Torsten Kluba

Uniform conclusions about therapeutic concepts and survival time of bone and soft tissue sarcoma patients are difficult due to the heterogeneity of histological subtypes as well as the different responses to neoadjuvant therapy. The subject of this retrospective study was the analysis of tumour free survival, risk and prognostic factors of sarcoma patients treated by limb sparing techniques or amputation. We included 118 patients with soft tissue sarcoma of the extremities treated primarily or secondarily at our institution between 1990 and 2008 with a minimum follow-up of 12 months. Data about the tumour free survival time, operative techniques and potential prognostic factors were analysed. The tumour-specific and overall survival were significantly influenced by two factors: the grading and distant metastases present at time of diagnosis. Optimal multimodal therapeutic concepts at a specialized Cancer Center decreased the risk of local recurrence. The importance of optimal preoperative and surgical course concerning the oncological long term outcome was investigated. The decrease in local recurrence as a result of multimodal therapeutic concepts at a specialized Cancer Center was confirmed. To evaluate the individual prognosis of a patient, multiple factors have to be considered. Factors for a poor prognosis are primary metastasis, high-grade tumours and several histological entities (<em>e.g</em>. synovial sarcoma, not other specified).


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document