Retrospective cohort study to investigate the impact of timing for term cesarean delivery on maternal and neonatal outcomes

2018 ◽  
Vol 32 (16) ◽  
pp. 2716-2720
Author(s):  
Carolyn F. Weiniger ◽  
Anya Krichevsky ◽  
David Mankuta ◽  
Smadar Eventov Friedman
2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Li Wang ◽  
Hongxia Wang ◽  
Lu Jia ◽  
Wenjie Qing ◽  
Fan Li ◽  
...  

Abstract Background The correlation between stage of labor and adverse delivery outcomes has been widely studied. Most of studies focused on nulliparous women, it was not very clear what impact the stage of labor duration had on multiparous women. Methods A retrospective cohort study was conducted among all the multiparous women of cephalic, term, singleton births, who planned vaginal delivery. The total stage of labor covered the first stage and the second stage in this study, and they were divided into subgroups. Adverse maternal outcomes were defined as referral cesarean delivery, instrumental delivery, postpartum hemorrhage, perineal laceration (III and IV degree), hospitalization stay ≥90th, and adverse neonatal outcomes as NICU, shoulder dystocia, Apgar score ≤ 7(5 min), neonatal resuscitation, assisted ventilation required immediately after delivery. Results There were 7109 parturients included in this study. The duration of first stage was 6.2(3.6–10.0) hours, the second stage was 0.3(0.2–0.7) hour, the total stage was 6.9(4.1–10.7) hours in multiparous women. At the first stage, the rates of overall adverse outcome were 21, 23.4, 28.8, 35.5, 38.4% in subgroups < 6 h, 6–11.9 h, 12–17.9 h, 18–23.9 h, ≥24 h, which increased significantly (X2 = 57.64, P < 0.001), and ARR (95% CI) were 1.10 (0.92,1.31), 1.33 (1.04,1.70), 1.80 (1.21,2.68), 2.57 (1.60,4.15) compared with subgroup < 6 h (ARR = 1); At the second stage, the rates of overall adverse outcome were 20.0, 30.7, 38.5, 61.2, 69.6% in subgroups < 1 h, 1–1.9 h, 2–2.9 h, 3–3.9 h, ≥4 h (X2 = 349.70, P < 0.001), and ARR (95% CI) were 1.89 (1.50, 2.39), 2.22 (1.55, 3.18), 10.64 (6.09, 18.59), 11.75 (6.55, 21.08) compared with subgroup < 1 h (ARR = 1)). At the total stage, the rates of overall adverse outcome were 21.5, 30.8, 42.4% in subgroups < 12 h, 12–23.9 h, ≥24 h (X2 = 84.90, P < 0.001), and ARR (95% CI) were 1.41 (1.16,1.72), 3.17 (2.10,4.80) compared with subgroup < 12 h (ARR = 1). Conclusions The prolonged stage of labor may lead to increased adverse outcomes in multiparous women, it was an independent risk factor of adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
li wang ◽  
hongxia Wang ◽  
lu jia ◽  
wenjie qing ◽  
fan Li ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: The correlation between stage of labor and adverse delivery outcomes has been widely studied. Most of studies focused on nulliparous women, it was not very clear what impact the stage of labor duration had on multiparous women.Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted among all the multiparous women of cephalic, term, singleton births, who planned vaginal delivery. The total stage of labor covered the first stage and the second stage in this study, and they were divided into subgroups. Adverse maternal outcomes were defined as referral cesarean delivery, instrumental delivery, postpartum hemorrhage, perineal laceration (III and IV degree), hospitalization stay ≥90th, and adverse neonatal outcomes as NICU, shoulder dystocia, Apgar score ≤7(5 min), neonatal resuscitation, assisted ventilation required immediately after delivery. Results: There were 7109 parturients included in this study. The duration of first stage was 6.2(3.6-10.0) hours, the second stage was 0.3(0.2-0.7) hour, the total stage was 6.9(4.1-10.7) hours in multiparous women. At the first stage, the rates of overall adverse outcome were 21%, 23.4%, 28.8%, 35.5%, 38.4% in subgroups <6h, 6-11.9h, 12-17.9h, 18-23.9h, ≥24h, which increased significantly (X2=57.64, P<0.001), and ARR (95% CI) were 1.10 (0.92,1.31), 1.33 (1.04,1.70), 1.80 (1.21,2.68), 2.57 (1.60,4.15) compared with subgroup <6h (ARR=1); At the second stage, the rates of overall adverse outcome were 20.0%, 30.7%, 38.5%, 61.2%, 69.6% in subgroups <1h, 1-1.9h, 2-2.9h, 3-3.9h, ≥4h (X2=349.70, P<0.001), and ARR (95% CI) were 1.89 (1.50, 2.39), 2.22 (1.55, 3.18), 10.64 (6.09, 18.59), 11.75 (6.55, 21.08) compared with subgroup <1h (ARR=1)). At the total stage, the rates of overall adverse outcome were 21.5%, 30.8%, 42.4% in subgroups <12h, 12-23.9h, ≥24h (X2=84.90, P<0.001), and ARR (95% CI) were 1.41 (1.16,1.72), 3.17 (2.10,4.80) compared with subgroup <12h (ARR=1).Conclusions: The prolonged stage of labor may lead to increased adverse outcomes in multiparous women, it was an independent risk factor of adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Li Wang ◽  
Hongxia Wang ◽  
Lu Jia ◽  
Wenjie Qing ◽  
Fan Li ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: The correlation between stage of labor and adverse delivery outcomes has been widely studied. Most of studies focused on nulliparous women, it was not very clear what impact the stage of labor duration had on multiparous women.Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted among all the multiparous women of cephalic, term, singleton births, who planned vaginal delivery. The total stage of labor covered the first stage and the second stage in this study, and they were divided into subgroups. Adverse maternal outcomes were defined as referral cesarean delivery, instrumental delivery, postpartum hemorrhage, perineal laceration (III and IV degree), hospitalization stay ≥90th, and adverse neonatal outcomes as NICU, shoulder dystocia, Apgar score ≤7(5 min), neonatal resuscitation, assisted ventilation required immediately after delivery. Results: There were 7109 parturients included in this study. The duration of first stage was 6.2(3.6-10.0) hours, the second stage was 0.3(0.2-0.7) hour, the total stage was 6.9(4.1-10.7) hours in multiparous women. At the first stage, the rates of overall adverse outcome were 21%, 23.4%, 28.8%, 35.5%, 38.4% in subgroups <6h, 6-11.9h, 12-17.9h, 18-23.9h, ≥24h, which increased significantly (X2=57.64, P<0.001), and ARR (95% CI) were 1.10 (0.92,1.31), 1.33 (1.04,1.70), 1.80 (1.21,2.68), 2.57 (1.60,4.15) compared with subgroup <6h (ARR=1); At the second stage, the rates of overall adverse outcome were 20.0%, 30.7%, 38.5%, 61.2%, 69.6% in subgroups <1h, 1-1.9h, 2-2.9h, 3-3.9h, ≥4h (X2=349.70, P<0.001), and ARR (95% CI) were 1.89 (1.50, 2.39), 2.22 (1.55, 3.18), 10.64 (6.09, 18.59), 11.75 (6.55, 21.08) compared with subgroup <1h (ARR=1)). At the total stage, the rates of overall adverse outcome were 21.5%, 30.8%, 42.4% in subgroups <12h, 12-23.9h, ≥24h (X2=84.90, P<0.001), and ARR (95% CI) were 1.41 (1.16,1.72), 3.17 (2.10,4.80) compared with subgroup <12h (ARR=1).Conclusions: The prolonged stage of labor may lead to increased adverse outcomes in multiparous women, it was an independent risk factor of adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sau Xiong Ang ◽  
Chie-Pein Chen ◽  
Fang-Ju Sun ◽  
Chen-Yu Chen

Abstract Background: Acute fatty liver of pregnancy (AFLP) and hemolysis, elevated liver enzymes and low platelets (HELLP) syndrome are two uncommon disorders that mimic each other clinically, but are distinct pathophysiologically. This study aimed to compare maternal and neonatal outcomes between AFLP and HELLP syndrome.Methods: This retrospective cohort study was performed at a tertiary referral center in Taiwan between June 2004 and April 2020. We used the Swansea Criteria to diagnose AFLP, and the Tennessee Classification System to diagnose HELLP syndrome. Maternal characteristics, laboratory data, complications, and neonatal outcomes were analyzed.Results: During the study period, 21 women had AFLP and 80 women had HELLP syndrome. There was a higher rate of preeclampsia (95.0% versus 23.8%) in the HELLP syndrome group compared to the AFLP group. However, the AFLP group had more other maternal complications including jaundice (85.7% versus 13.8%), acute kidney injury (61.9% versus 15.0%), disseminated intravascular coagulopathy (66.7% versus 8.8%), and sepsis (47.6% versus 10.0%) compared to the HELLP syndrome group. Nevertheless, higher rates of small for gestational age neonates (57.1% versus 33.3%), neonatal respiratory distress syndrome (39.2% versus 8.3%) and neonatal sepsis (34.2% versus 12.5%) were noted in the HELLP syndrome group.Conclusions: AFLP is associated with a higher rate of multiple organ dysfunction in mothers, whereas HELLP syndrome is associated with a higher rate of neonatal morbidity.


Midwifery ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 53 ◽  
pp. 71-79 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shi Tian Voon ◽  
Julie Tay Suan Lay ◽  
Wilson Tam Wai San ◽  
Shefaly Shorey ◽  
Serena Koh Siew Lin

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document