Links between peer victimization, dating violence victimization and depression in adolescence: A genetically-informed study

Author(s):  
Kevin Smith ◽  
Mara Brendgen ◽  
Martine Hébert ◽  
Frank Vitaro ◽  
Ginette Dionne ◽  
...  
2021 ◽  
pp. 088626052199188
Author(s):  
Kevin Smith ◽  
Martine Hébert ◽  
Mara Brendgen ◽  
Martin Blais

Peer victimization and dating violence are highly prevalent among adolescents. Those two forms of victimization are notably associated with heightened levels of internalizing problems. The stress generation hypothesis stipulates that depressive cognitions and behaviors may generate interpersonal stressors for depressed individuals. It has thus been hypothesized that victims of peer victimization may experience higher levels of internalizing problems, which in turn, may render them more at risk of experiencing dating violence victimization. We used a longitudinal design with three waves from the Quebec Youth’s Romantic Relationships Survey ( n = 4,923). Participants (59.6% girls, aged between 14 and 18 years old) reported their experiences of dating violence victimization, peer victimization and psychological distress. A cross-lagged panel analysis was performed to test the mediational effect of psychological distress between peer victimization and dating violence while controlling for age and gender. The interaction effect of gender in the model was also tested. The longitudinal relationship between peer victimization and dating violence victimization was significantly mediated by internalizing problems. This result thus supports the stress generation hypothesis. No interaction effect of gender was observed in the model, thus suggesting that this relationship does not change as a function of gender. This study offers to practitioners in the area of prevention and intervention for peer victimization and dating violence a different way of tackling the problem of revictimization. Indeed, our findings revealed that internalizing problems were longitudinally associated with subsequent relational problems, when occurring after being victimized. Therefore, addressing internalizing problems instead, or in addition to prevention or intervention efforts to stop victimization may help in reducing revictimization rates.


2002 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gina M. Wingood ◽  
Donna Hubbard McCree ◽  
Ralph J. DiCtemente ◽  
Kathy Harrington ◽  
Susan L. Davies

2019 ◽  
Vol 48 (12) ◽  
pp. 2360-2376 ◽  
Author(s):  
Natallia Sianko ◽  
Deborah Kunkel ◽  
Martie P. Thompson ◽  
Mark A. Small ◽  
James R. McDonell

2008 ◽  
Vol 8 (4) ◽  
pp. 403-422 ◽  
Author(s):  
SooJean Choi-Misailidis ◽  
Earl S. Hishinuma ◽  
Stephanie T. Nishimura ◽  
Meda Chesney-Lind

2017 ◽  
Vol 24 (4) ◽  
pp. 401-420 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ellen E. Haynes ◽  
Catherine V. Strauss ◽  
Gregory L. Stuart ◽  
Ryan C. Shorey

The present study sought to examine whether drinking motives (i.e., coping, social, conformity, and enhancement) moderated the relationship between physical, sexual, and psychological dating violence victimization and alcohol-related problems in a sample of drinking college women ( N = 177). Results demonstrated that coping and social drinking motives moderated the relationship between sexual victimization and alcohol problems; conformity, social, and enhancement drinking motives moderated the relationship between alcohol-related problems and physical victimization; no significant findings were evident for psychological aggression victimization. Our results partially support the self-medication model of alcohol use, and this may be particularly relevant to sexual victimization.


2010 ◽  
Vol 25 (2) ◽  
pp. 202-223 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bruce Taylor ◽  
Nan Stein ◽  
Frances Burden

In this experiment, 123 sixth and seventh grade classrooms from Cleveland area schools were randomly assigned to one of two five-session curricula addressing gender violence/sexual harassment (GV/SH) or to a no-treatment control. Three-student surveys were administered. Students in the law and justice curricula, compared to the control group, had significantly improved outcomes in awareness of their abusive behaviors, attitudes toward GV/SH and personal space, and knowledge. Students in the interaction curricula experienced lower rates of victimization, increased awareness of abusive behaviors, and improved attitudes toward personal space. Neither curricula affected perpetration or victimization of sexual harassment. While the intervention appeared to reduce peer violence victimization and perpetration, a conflicting finding emerged—the intervention may have increased dating violence perpetration (or at least the reporting of it) but not dating violence victimization.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document