Impact of Bank Concentration and Financial Development on Growth Volatility: The Case of Selected OIC Countries

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-13
Author(s):  
Edib Smolo ◽  
Mansor H. Ibrahim ◽  
Ginanjar Dewandaru
Keyword(s):  
Financial Development ◽  
Growth Volatility ◽  
Bank Concentration

The role of institutions in output growth volatility-financial development nexus

2016 ◽  
Vol 43 (6) ◽  
pp. 910-927 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ibrahim Dolapo Raheem ◽  
Kazeem Bello Ajide ◽  
Oluwatosin Adeniyi
Keyword(s):  
Financial Development ◽  
Measurement Errors ◽  
Output Growth ◽  
Policy Implications ◽  
Output Volatility ◽  
Reverse Causality ◽  
Data Set ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Growth Volatility

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to investigate the role of institutions in the financial development-output growth volatility nexus. It provides new channels through which financial development can dampen the output growth volatilities of the countries under investigation. Design/methodology/approach A comprehensive data set for 71 countries covering the period from 1996 to 2012 and the System GMM approach were used. The choice of the methodology is to deal with endogeneity issues such as measurement errors, reverse causality among other issues. Findings A number of findings were emanated from the empirical analysis. First, the estimates provided evidence of the volatility-reducing effect of financial development. Second, institutions do not have the same reducing influence on output growth volatility. Third, the interaction of financial development and institutions showed that the output volatility reduction arising from financial development is enhanced in the presence of improved institutions. Research limitations/implications The policy implications derived from this study are in twofolds: first, it is important for policymakers to formulate policies that would ensure and enhance the development of the financial sectors, since its importance in minimizing output volatility has been established. Second, institutional quality should be developed so as to further enhance the growth volatility-reducing influence of financial development. Particularly, institutions should be improved along the multiple dimensions captured in the analysis. Originality/value To the best knowledge, the novelty of this study to the literature is the introduction of institutions, which is hypothesized to increase the dampening effects of financial development in output growth volatility.

scholarly journals Non-Linear Relationship between Financial Development, Economic Growth and Growth Volatility: Evidence from Nigeria

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Oro Ufuo Oro ◽  
Paul Alagidede
Keyword(s):  
Economic Growth ◽  
Linear Relationship ◽  
Financial Development ◽  
Financial Services ◽  
Policy Implications ◽  
Empirical Literature ◽  
Development Economic ◽  
Econometric Methods ◽  
Growth Volatility ◽  
The Relationship

The relationship between economic growth, growth volatility and financial sector development continues to attract attention in the theoretical and empirical literature. Over time, some studies hypothesize that finance has a causal linear relationship with growth. Recently several other authors contradict this claim and argue that the relationship that exists between finance and growth is nonlinear. We investigate these claims for Nigeria for the period between 1970 and 2015, using semi-parametric econometric methods, Hansen sample splitting techniques and threshold estimator. We observed no evidence of ‘Too much finance’ as claimed by many researchers in recent times. We show that the relationship between financial development and economic growth is U-shaped. This is equally true for the relationship between financial development and growth volatility. We also discuss policy implications of our findings and recommend financial innovations and decentralization of stock exchanges to boost access to financial services, in addition, improved regulation to enhance financial market efficiency.

scholarly journals FINANCIAL DEVELOPMENT, SHOCKS, AND GROWTH VOLATILITY

2013 ◽  
Vol 18 (3) ◽  
pp. 651-688 ◽  
Author(s):  
Debdulal Mallick
Keyword(s):  
Business Cycle ◽  
Financial Development ◽  
Growth Models ◽  
Unified Framework ◽  
Country Level ◽  
Long Run ◽  
Private Credit ◽  
The Business Cycle ◽  
Growth Volatility ◽  
Endogenous Growth Models

This paper uses spectral theory to develop the following two testable hypotheses in a unified framework for the predictions of business-cycle and endogenous growth models: (i) financial development affects only business-cycle volatility; and (ii) shocks affect both business-cycle volatility and long-run volatility of GDP growth. In other words, volatility caused by shocks is more persistent than that caused by financial underdevelopment. We decompose the business-cycle and long-run volatility by the spectral method and then test the hypotheses at the cross-country level. Empirical evidence provides support for both hypotheses. Higher private credit, a bank-based measure of financial development, dampens business-cycle volatility but not long-run volatility. Volatility of shocks, as measured by the volatility of changes in the terms of trade, magnifies both business-cycle and long-run volatility. The results are robust to accounting for endogeneity, a market-based measure of financial development, and an alternative method of volatility decomposition.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document