Menu Choice: Satisfaction or Overload?

2013 ◽  
Vol 11 (3) ◽  
pp. 275-285 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nick Johns ◽  
John S. A. Edwards ◽  
Heather J. Hartwell
Author(s):  
Wagner A. Kamakura ◽  
Kyuseop Kwak
Keyword(s):  

Psichologija ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 39 ◽  
pp. 45-58
Author(s):  
Ieva Urbanavičiūtė

Straipsnyje nagrinėjami ketinimo eiti pasirinktu profesiniu keliu ypatumai. Pagrindiniai tyrimo uždaviniai – įvertinti, kaip ketinimą eiti pasirinktu profesiniu keliu prognozuoja pasitenkinimo pasirinkta profesija lygis, įsivaizduojamas realaus ir idealaus bei realaus ir prestižinio darbo atitikimas bei asmenybės ypatumai (neurotizmas ir sąmoningumas), ir palyginti, kuo skiriasi abiejų imčių ketinimo eiti pasirinktu profesiniu keliu prielaidos.Dviejų imčių – nepatenkintųjų pasirinkta profesija (n = 55) ir patenkintųjų pasirinkta profesija (n = 76) – hierarchinės regresijos analizė parodė, kad šių imčių ketinimo eiti pasirinktu profesiniu keliu prielaidos yra nevienodos. Prognozuojant ketinimą eiti pasirinktu profesiniu keliu pirmuoju atveju reikšmingi kintamieji yra pasitenkinimo pasirinkta profesija lygis, realaus ir prestižinio darbo atitikimas ir neurotizmo lygis. Antruoju atveju gautas vyraujantis kintamasis – pasitenkinimo pasirinkta profesija lygis. Gauti rezultatai turi tiek teorinių, tiek praktinių pritaikymo galimybių ir nubrėžia tolesnių tyrimų šioje srityje gaires.Pagrindiniai žodžiai: karjeros planavimas, profesijos pasirinkimas, ateities lūkesčiai, asmenybės veiksniai.University undergraduates’ career choice commitment: An analysis of two samples Ieva Urbanavičiūtė SummaryCareer development is a rather popular research area. Previous studies have revealed numerous factors that are relevant for the process of career planning during various stages of life. The constantly changing and challenging world, as well as the demand of new competencies in the labour market, draw attention to the time when an individual leaves school and sets future career goals preparing to enter the world of work. There is still an open question which psychological factors could be crucial for the smooth career goal setting at this time.The present study aims to explore one’s future career intentions after one has already chosen a study major. The study had the following goals: to analyse whether career choice commitment (having future career goals related to one’s major) can be predicted by the level of career choice satisfaction, expected real-ideal and real-prestigious job fit, and personality factors such as neuroticism and conscientiousness, conducting analysis in two samples; to explore the differences of the predictors of career goal commitment between Sample 1 and Sample 2.185 Vilnius University undergraduates (131 females, 54 males) took part in the study. The primary sample was then subdivided into two parts, excluding the middle range data: Sample 1 consisted of participants whose career choice satisfaction was low (n = 55), and Sample 2 consisted of participants whose career choice satisfaction was high (n = 76). A two-step hierarchical regression model analysis was run in both samples. The results revealed multiple significant predictors of career choice commitment in Sample 1: the level of career choice satisfaction (low level in this sample), expected real-prestigious job fit, and, to a lesser extent, expected real-ideal job fit were significant predictors in the primary regression model. Adding neuroticism and conscientiousness to the regression model significantly changed it by increasing its R2, although only neuroticism was a significant predictor. On the contrary, in Sample 2, the level of career choice satisfaction (high in this sample) was the dominant predictor of career choice commitment, followed only by expected real-prestigious jog fit. Adding personality variables to the model didn’t produce a significant change in this case. The results provide the basis for further theoretical and practical implications in career counselling and set guidelines for the future research.Keywords: career planning, vocational choice, outcome expectations, personality factors.


2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (10) ◽  
pp. e3884
Author(s):  
Hatan Mortada ◽  
Nashwa Mustafa ◽  
Basma Bamakhrama ◽  
Marwa Alshateb ◽  
Adnan G. Gelidan ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 155-170
Author(s):  
Dale B. Poon ◽  
Helen M.G. Watt ◽  
Sandra E. Stewart

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to examine the career motivations of future counseling professionals. Design/methodology/approach Students completing their Masters of Counseling (n=174) responded to a 30 min survey about their career motivations, counseling career choice satisfaction, planned persistence in the counseling profession and perceptions of the demand and reward structure offered by counseling work. Motivational profiles were educed using hierarchical cluster analysis and compared via MANOVA. Findings Four distinct profiles were identified: “moderately engaged with family values,” “lower engaged,” “altruistic with family values” and “multiply motivated.” Clusters differed in their perceptions of the demand and reward structure offered by a counseling career, and their level of satisfaction with, and planned persistence in the profession. Cluster composition was unrelated to age, gender or pursuit of previous careers. Practical implications Implications for educators pertain to capitalizing on career motivations for different types of entrants, to tailor recruitment and professional preparation. Originality/value The authors add to existing literature by drawing on the theoretical lens of expectancy-value theory in a person-centered approach, to the study of counselor motivations, professional perceptions and career choice satisfaction.


2009 ◽  
pp. 471-486 ◽  
Author(s):  
Timothy D. Wilson ◽  
Douglas J. Lisle ◽  
Jonathan W. Schooler ◽  
Sara D. Hodges ◽  
Kristen J. Klaaren ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

Author(s):  
Hong-In Cheng ◽  
Patrick E. Patterson

With the increasing use of e-business web sites, users are often asked to select a menu-item from a large numbers of options. In this research, the pull-down menu, fisheye menu and grid menu were tested to compare the performance time, error rate, user satisfaction, simplicity, user friendliness, usefulness, and overall user preference of each menu type. The grid menu was more efficient in selection speed than the pull-down and fisheye menus when the number of menu-items was 50 and 100. The time needed to choose a menu-item with a grid menu was less affected by the size of menu and the physical location of an item within a menu. The pull-down and the grid menus were considered to be more satisfactory, simple, user friendly, and useful than the fisheye menu. 42.3 percent of subjects indicated that the grid menu was their preferred selection tool among the menus. The grid menu is an efficient and robust alternative menu choice for small and middle size menu lists.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document