Respecting Local Sexual Cultures—The Process of Innovative HIV Prevention Outreach Within a Public Sex Environment

2009 ◽  
Vol 5 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 22-32
Author(s):  
Jamie Frankis ◽  
Paul Flowers
2005 ◽  
Vol 3 (3) ◽  
pp. 35-50 ◽  
Author(s):  
Corina D Segovia-Tadehara ◽  
Mark O. Bigler ◽  
David Ferguson ◽  
Jamie Diarte

AIDS Care ◽  
2000 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 225-234 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. French ◽  
R. Power ◽  
S. Mitchell
Keyword(s):  

2018 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 205630511876829
Author(s):  
Ben Light ◽  
Peta Mitchell ◽  
Patrik Wikström

With the rise of geo-social media, location is emerging as a particularly sensitive data point for big data and digital media research. To explore this area, we reflect on our ethics for a study in which we analyze data generated via an app that facilitates public sex among men who have sex with men. The ethical sensitivities around location are further heightened in the context of research into such digital sexual cultures. Public sexual cultures involving men who have sex with men operate both in spaces “meant” for public sex (e.g., gay saunas and dark rooms) and spaces “not meant” for public sex (e.g., shopping centers and public toilets). The app in question facilitates this activity. We developed a web scraper that carefully collected selected data from the app and that data were then analyzed to help identify ethical issues. We used a mixture of content analysis using Python scripts, geovisualisation software and manual qualitative coding techniques. Our findings, which are methodological rather than theoretical in nature, center on the ethics associated with generating, processing, presenting, archiving and deleting big data in a context where harassment, imprisonment, physical harm and even death occur. We find a tension in normal standards of ethical conduct where humans are involved in research. We found that location came to the fore as a key—though not the only—actor requiring attention when considering ethics in a big data context.


Sexualities ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 136346072110281
Author(s):  
Brian Heaphy ◽  
James Hodgson

This article revisits the personal stories that younger male civil partners told about their sexual practices, in what most termed their ‘marriage’, to generate insights into the extent to which they succumbed to the dangers that critics of same-sex marriage foretold. It provides a baseline analysis against which the findings of future studies of both heterosexual and same-sex marriages and civil partnerships can be compared. The data we discuss are comprised of joint ( n = 25) and individual ( n = 50) interviews with couples. Participants’ stories about ‘public’, ‘private’ and ‘exclusive’ sex can appear to support the predictions of some key critics. Participants tended to make commitments to sexual monogamy and link their sexual practices to deepening couple intimacy. However, viewed as stories of socioculturally shaped and biographically embedded sexual practices, they offer insights into the more complex relationships between civil partnership, marriage, sexual exclusivity and intimacy. On closer examination, they suggest it is not simply the case that civil partnership or same-sex marriage (and marriage more generally) ‘imposes’ heteronormative sexual conventions but that relational biographies are significant in shaping simultaneously conventional and deconstructive approaches to married sexuality. Partners in formalized same-sex relationships do not simply follow heterosexual norms. Rather, they juggle the often contradictory norms of mainstream and queer sexual cultures. Understanding the implications for marriage as an institution requires approaches to analysis that do not pose heterosexual marriage as the ‘straw man’ of queer analysis.


2010 ◽  
Vol 43 (1) ◽  
pp. 56
Author(s):  
SHERRY BOSCHERT
Keyword(s):  

2018 ◽  
Vol 6 (4) ◽  
pp. 355-363 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sarah W. Feldstein Ewing ◽  
Angela D. Bryan ◽  
Tutu Alicante ◽  
P. Todd Korthuis ◽  
Karen A. Hudson ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document