scholarly journals Panel Discussion on Libraries and Best Practices in Fair Use

2012 ◽  
Vol 24 (3) ◽  
pp. 230-238
Author(s):  
Andrée J. Rathemacher
Author(s):  
Abigail Goben ◽  
Alison F. Doubleday

Health science educators, researchers, and clinicians are regularly faced with challenges surrounding copyright and fair use. However, little is known about how copyright is addressed in the professional literature. In order to identify themes and gaps, the authors undertook a narrative review of articles published in health sciences literature between 2000-2016. Only 154 articles were identified on the topic, which attempted to address areas of concern for educators, researchers, and clinicians across all health science disciplines. Overarching issues were identified including prevalence of misinformation or misunderstandings, particularly around fair use, and the continued need for authoritative copyright education and definition of best practices.


Author(s):  
William Schell ◽  
Bryce Hughes ◽  
John Donald ◽  
Tom Goldfinch ◽  
Anthony Kadi ◽  
...  

Engineering knowledge is characterized by an artificial “border” that distinguishes technical expertise from the professional skills needed to solve society’s most pressing problems. Scholars of engineering leadership argue that students who are provided opportunities to blur that distinction and integrate their technical and professional training are better prepared for interdisciplinary and transnational engineering work. This “Lightning Talk” session brings together engineering leadership researchers from universities in Australia, Canada, and the United States to explore an array of approaches to understanding and developing engineering leadership. Best practices are presented followed by a panel discussion of the implications for internationalizing work on engineering leadership.


2017 ◽  
Vol 37 (11) ◽  
pp. 1585-1599 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nathan Kunz ◽  
Luk N. Van Wassenhove ◽  
Maria Besiou ◽  
Christophe Hambye ◽  
Gyöngyi Kovács

Purpose This paper is based on a panel discussion at EurOMA 2015. The purpose of this paper is to identify a number of barriers to relevant research in humanitarian logistics. The authors propose a charter of ten rules for conducting relevant humanitarian research. Design/methodology/approach The authors use operations management literature to identify best practices for doing research with practice. The authors compile, condense and interpret opinions expressed by three academics and one practitioner at the panel discussion, and illustrate them through quotes. Findings The increasing volume of papers published in the humanitarian logistics literature has not led to a proportional impact on practice. The authors identify a number of reasons for this, such as poor problem definition, difficult access to data or lack of contextualization. The authors propose a charter of ten rules that have the potential to make humanitarian logistics research more relevant for practice. Practical implications By developing best practices for doing relevant research in humanitarian logistics, this paper enables the academic community and practice to better work together on relevant and impactful research projects. Academic knowledge combined with practice-inspired problems has the potential to generate significant improvements to humanitarian practice. Originality/value This paper is the first to address the problem of relevance of humanitarian logistics research. It is also one of the few papers involving a practitioner to discuss practical relevance of research. Through this unique approach, it is hoped that this paper provides a set of particularly helpful recommendations for researchers studying humanitarian logistics.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aidsa Santiago-Roman ◽  
Christopher Papadopoulos ◽  
Matthew Ohland ◽  
Ruth Streveler ◽  
Anna Dollar ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document