scholarly journals The role of telomerase reverse transcriptase (TERT) promoter mutations in prognosis in bladder cancer

Bioengineered ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 1495-1504
Author(s):  
Song Wan ◽  
Xuan Liu ◽  
Wei Hua ◽  
Ming Xi ◽  
Yulin Zhou ◽  
...  
2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Shaobo Zhang

Telomerase reverse transcriptase (TERT) promoter mutations have been found in approximately 60–80% of bladder urothelial cancers and its variants of all grades anywhere in the urinary tract. The TERT promoter mutations occur early in urothelial neoplasia and are biomarkers for neoplasm development, recurrence, diagnosis, differential diagnosis, and potentially a therapeutic target. This review highlighted the role of TERT promoter mutations in urothelial tumorigenesis, and the potential clinical implications.


2014 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rajiv Kumar ◽  
Barbara Heidenreich ◽  
Ismail Hosen ◽  
Sivaramakrishna Rachakonda ◽  
Kari Hemminki

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (6_suppl) ◽  
pp. 310-310 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sumit Isharwal ◽  
Francois Audenet ◽  
Eugene J. Pietzak ◽  
Eugene K. Cha ◽  
Gopa Iyer ◽  
...  

310 Background: Telomerase reverse transcriptase (TERT) is the most frequently altered gene in urothelial cancer (UC), detected across all grades and stages of disease. We sought to characterize TERT alterations within a prospective cohort of UC treated at our institute and compare the frequency of genomic alterations in TERT promoter mutant vs wild-type UC specimens. Methods: Patients diagnosed with bladder urothelial tumors were enrolled onto an institutional review board approved prospective sequencing protocol. Tumor and matched germline DNA were analyzed for somatic point mutations, truncations, copy number alterations, and insertions/deletions using the MSK-IMPACT NGS assay that detects alterations in all exons and select introns of 410 oncogenes and tumor suppressor genes as well as the entire TERT promoter region. Results: 329 UC were sequenced of which 236 (71.7%) harbored TERT mutations, the majority being promoter region hotspots (chr5: 1295228 G > A [81%] and chr5:1295250 G > A [16%]). Patients with TERT promoter mutations were significantly older than those without (69.01±10.70 years vs. 65.44±11.78 years, p = 0.0317). UC with TERT promoter mutations had significantly higher mutation count [median 10 (range: 2-76) vs median 5 (range: 0-119)] as well as copy number alterations [median 0.11 (range: 0-0.68) vs median 0.047 (range: 0-0.65)]. Between UC with and without TERT promoter mutations, there was a very significant difference in mutation frequencies of ARID1A(33% vs 11%), PIK3CA(28% vs 13%), FGFR3(32% vs 16%), CREBBP(19% vs 4%), CDKN1A(17% vs 2%), ERBB2(26% vs 9%), ERCC2(15% vs 3%), TSC1(11% vs 0%), MT2C(17% vs 9%) (all with p < 0.005). Conclusions: TERT is the most frequently altered gene in bladder cancer with the majority of TERT alterations comprised of two hotspot mutations. UC with TERT promoter mutations tends to occur in older patients and is associated with overall higher mutation count and copy number alterations. A number of genes are differentially mutated in UC with and without TERT promoter mutations and may suggest a link between TERT promoter mutations and distinct mutations profiles in UC.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document