scholarly journals Life‐Threatening Adverse Event After Amphotericin B Lipid Complex Treatment in a Patient Treated Previously with Amphotericin B Deoxycholate

1998 ◽  
Vol 26 (4) ◽  
pp. 1016-1016 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Garnacho‐Montero ◽  
C. Ortiz‐Leyba ◽  
J. L. García Garmendia ◽  
F. J. Jiménez Jiménez
1999 ◽  
Vol 43 (11) ◽  
pp. 2592-2599 ◽  
Author(s):  
David W. Denning ◽  
Peter Warn

ABSTRACT Using an isolate of Aspergillus fumigatus that is less susceptible in vivo to amphotericin B than most other isolates, we compared different doses of liposomal nystatin (L-nystatin), liposomal amphotericin B (L-amphotericin), and amphotericin B lipid complex (ABLC) with amphotericin B deoxycholate. Four experiments with intravenously infected neutropenic mice were conducted. A dose of L-nystatin at 10 mg/kg of body weight was toxic (the mice had fits or respiratory arrest). The optimal dosage of L-nystatin was 5 mg/kg daily on days 1, 2, 4, and 7 (90% survival). This was superior to L-amphotericin (5 mg/kg [P = 0.24] and 1 mg/kg [P < 0.0001]), ABLC (5 mg/kg [P = 0.014] and 1 mg/kg [P < 0.0001]), and amphotericin B deoxycholate (5 mg/kg [P = 0.008]). In terms of liver and kidney cultures, L-nystatin (5 mg/kg) was superior to all other regimens (P = 0.0032 and <0.0001, respectively). Higher doses of L-amphotericin (25 and 50 mg/kg) in one earlier experiment were more effective (100% survival) than 1 mg of L-amphotericin per kg and amphotericin deoxycholate (5 mg/kg) in terms of mortality and both liver and kidney culture results and to L-amphotericin (5 mg/kg) in terms of liver and kidney culture results only. ABLC (25 mg/kg) given daily for 7 days was superior to ABLC (50 mg/kg [P = 0.03]) but not to ABLC at 5 mg/kg or amphotericin B deoxycholate in terms of mortality, although it was in terms of liver and kidney culture results. No dose-response for amphotericin B (5 and 1 mg/kg) was demonstrable. In conclusion, in this stringent model, high doses of L-amphotericin and ABLC could overcome reduced susceptibility to amphotericin B deoxycholate, but all were inferior to 5- to 10-fold lower doses of L-nystatin.


2010 ◽  
Vol 54 (8) ◽  
pp. 3432-3441 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jodi M. Lestner ◽  
Susan J. Howard ◽  
Joanne Goodwin ◽  
Lea Gregson ◽  
Jayesh Majithiya ◽  
...  

ABSTRACT The pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic (PK-PD) properties of amphotericin B (AmB) formulations against invasive pulmonary aspergillosis (IPA) are not well understood. We used an in vitro model of IPA to further elucidate the PK-PD of amphotericin B deoxycholate (DAmB), liposomal amphotericin B (LAmB) and amphotericin B lipid complex (ABLC). The pharmacokinetics of these formulations for endovascular fluid, endothelial cells, and alveolar cells were estimated. Pharmacodynamic relationships were defined by measuring concentrations of galactomannan in endovascular and alveolar compartments. Confocal microscopy was used to visualize fungal biomass. A mathematical model was used to calculate the area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) in each compartment and estimate the extent of drug penetration. The interaction of LAmB with host cells and hyphae was visualized using sulforhodamine B-labeled liposomes. The MICs for the pure compound and the three formulations were comparable (0.125 to 0.25 mg/liter). For all formulations, concentrations of AmB progressively declined in the endovascular fluid as the drug distributed into the cellular bilayer. Depending on the formulation, the AUCs for AmB were 10 to 300 times higher within the cells than within endovascular fluid. The concentrations producing a 50% maximal effect (EC50) in the endovascular compartment were 0.12, 1.03, and 4.41 mg/liter for DAmB, LAmB, and ABLC, respectively, whereas, the EC50 in the alveolar compartment were 0.17, 7.76, and 39.34 mg/liter, respectively. Confocal microscopy suggested that liposomes interacted directly with hyphae and host cells. The PK-PD relationships of the three most widely used formulations of AmB differ markedly within an in vitro lung model of IPA.


2015 ◽  
Vol 59 (5) ◽  
pp. 2735-2745 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zaid Al-Nakeeb ◽  
Vidmantas Petraitis ◽  
Joanne Goodwin ◽  
Ruta Petraitiene ◽  
Thomas J. Walsh ◽  
...  

ABSTRACTAmphotericin B is a first-line agent for the treatment of invasive aspergillosis. However, relatively little is known about the pharmacodynamics of amphotericin B for invasive pulmonary aspergillosis. We studied the pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD) of amphotericin B deoxycholate (DAMB), amphotericin B lipid complex (ABLC), and liposomal amphotericin B (LAMB) by using a neutropenic-rabbit model of invasive pulmonary aspergillosis. The study endpoints were lung weight, infarct score, and levels of circulating galactomannan and (1→3)-β-d-glucan. Mathematical models were used to describe PK-PD relationships. The experimental findings were bridged to humans by Monte Carlo simulation. Each amphotericin B formulation induced a dose-dependent decline in study endpoints. Near-maximal antifungal activity was evident with DAMB at 1 mg/kg/day and ABLC and LAMB at 5 mg/kg/day. The bridging study suggested that the “average” patient receiving LAMB at 3 mg/kg/day was predicted to have complete suppression of galactomannan and (1→3)-β-d-glucan levels, but 20 to 30% of the patients still had a galactomannan index of >1 and (1→3)-β-d-glucan levels of >60 pg/ml. All formulations of amphotericin B induce a dose-dependent reduction in markers of lung injury and circulating fungus-related biomarkers. A clinical dosage of liposomal amphotericin B of 3 mg/kg/day is predicted to cause complete suppression of galactomannan and (1→3)-β-d-glucan levels in the majority of patients.


2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (4) ◽  
pp. 14-24
Author(s):  
N. N. Klimko ◽  
O. V. Shadrivova

Invasive aspergillosis is a life-threatening complication in patients with severe influenza and COVID-19 in intensive care units. Risk factors for the invasive aspergillosis development are transitory immunosuppression associated with severe influenza and COVID-19, as well as the use of glucocorticosteroids and immunosuppressive therapy. In the presence of risk factors, suspected clinical and radiological signs of invasive aspergillosis, bronchoscopy and examination of material from the lower respiratory tract are necessary: test for galactomannan, microscopy with white calcofluor staining and inoculation on Sabouraud agar medium. Voriconazole or are recommended as first-line treatment for invasive aspergillosis in patients with severe influenza and COVID-19. Amphotericin B Liposomal, Amphotericin B Lipid Complex, and Caspofungin are the alternative options for the invasive aspergillosis treatment. Combination therapy is possible. It is necessary to control the underlying disease with eliminate or reduce the severity of risk factors. 


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document