Is There a Temperate Bias in Our Understanding of How Climate Change Will Alter Plant-Herbivore Interactions? A Meta-analysis of Experimental Studies

2016 ◽  
Vol 188 (S1) ◽  
pp. S74-S89 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fabiane M. Mundim ◽  
Emilio M. Bruna
2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elena Hamann ◽  
Cameron Blevins ◽  
Steven J. Franks ◽  
M. Inam Jameel ◽  
Jill T. Anderson

ABSTRACTPlant-herbivore interactions have evolved in response to co-evolutionary dynamics, along with selection driven by abiotic conditions. We examine how abiotic factors influence trait expression in both plants and herbivores to evaluate how climate change will alter this long-standing interaction. The paleontological record documents increased herbivory during periods of global warming in the deep past. In phylogenetically-corrected meta-analyses, we find that elevated temperatures, CO2 concentration, drought stress and nutrient conditions directly and indirectly induce greater herbivore consumption, primarily in agricultural systems. Additionally, elevated CO2 delays herbivore development, but increased temperatures accelerate development. For annual plants, higher temperatures, CO2, and drought stress increase foliar herbivory, and our meta-analysis suggests that greater temperatures and drought may heighten florivory in perennials. Human actions are causing concurrent shifts in CO2, temperature, precipitation regimes and nitrogen deposition, yet few studies evaluate interactions among these changing conditions. We call for additional multifactorial studies that simultaneously manipulate multiple climatic factors, which will enable us to generate more robust predictions of how climate change could disrupt plant-herbivore interactions. Finally, we consider how shifts in insect and plant phenology and distribution patterns could lead to ecological mismatches, and how these changes may drive future adaptation and coevolution between interacting species.


2018 ◽  
Vol 106 (4) ◽  
pp. 1508-1519 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rebecca Sanders-DeMott ◽  
Risa McNellis ◽  
Maroua Jabouri ◽  
Pamela H. Templer

2017 ◽  
Vol 372 (1712) ◽  
pp. 20160034 ◽  
Author(s):  
Susan R. Whitehead ◽  
Martin M. Turcotte ◽  
Katja Poveda

For millennia, humans have imposed strong selection on domesticated crops, resulting in drastically altered crop phenotypes compared with wild ancestors. Crop yields have increased, but a long-held hypothesis is that domestication has also unintentionally decreased plant defences against herbivores. To test this hypothesis, we conducted a phylogenetically controlled meta-analysis comparing insect herbivore resistance and putative plant defence traits between crops and their wild relatives. Our database included 2098 comparisons made across 73 crops in 89 studies. We found that domestication consistently reduced plant resistance to herbivores, although the magnitude of the effects varied across plant organs and depended on how resistance was measured. However, domestication had no consistent effects on the specific plant defence traits underlying resistance, including secondary metabolites and physical feeding barriers. The values of these traits sometimes increased and sometimes decreased during domestication. Consistent negative effects of domestication were observed only when defence traits were measured in reproductive organs or in the plant organ that was harvested. These results highlight the complexity of evolution under domestication and the need for an improved theoretical understanding of the mechanisms through which agronomic selection can influence the species interactions that impact both the yield and sustainability of our food systems. This article is part of the themed issue ‘Human influences on evolution, and the ecological and societal consequences’.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elena Hamann ◽  
Cameron Blevins ◽  
Steven J. Franks ◽  
M. Inam Jameel ◽  
Jill T. Anderson

2009 ◽  
Vol 109 (2) ◽  
pp. 126-134 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lochran W. Traill ◽  
Peter J. Whitehead ◽  
Barry W. Brook

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document