Pressure and magnetic field-induced transport effects in Ni45.4Mn40In14.6 alloy

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sergiy M Konoplyuk ◽  
Alexandr V Kolomiets ◽  
J Prokleska ◽  
Petr Proschek ◽  
Volodymyr Buturlim ◽  
...  
2011 ◽  
Vol 37 (11) ◽  
pp. 947-956 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. Cortés-Maldonado ◽  
J. E. Espinosa-Rosales ◽  
A. F. Carballo-Sánchez ◽  
F. Pérez-Rodríguez

2001 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. E. Kayama ◽  
E. A. Aramaki ◽  
R. P. Mota ◽  
M. A. Algatti ◽  
R. Y. Honda

2007 ◽  
Vol 75 (20) ◽  
Author(s):  
V. I. Kozub ◽  
A. A. Zyuzin ◽  
O. Entin-Wohlman ◽  
A. Aharony ◽  
Y. M. Galperin ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 69-75 ◽  
Author(s):  
Анастасия Петухова ◽  
Anastasia Petukhova ◽  
Станислав Петухов ◽  
Stanislav Petukhov

We present and discuss properties of the following magnetic field models in a magnetic cloud: Miller and Turner solution, modified Miller–Turner solution, Romashets–Vandas toroidal and integral models, and Krittinatham–Ruffolo model. Helicity of the magnetic field in all the models is the main feature of magnetic clouds. The first three models describe the magnetic field inside an ideal torus. In the integral model, parameters of a generating torus ambiguously determine the volume and form of the magnetic field region. In the Krittinatham–Ruffolo model, the cross-section radius of the torus is variable, thereby it corresponds more closely to the real form of magnetic clouds in the inner heliosphere. These models can be used to interpret in-situ observations of the magnetic flux rope, to study a Forbush decrease in magnetic clouds and transport effects of solar energetic particles injected into a coronal mass ejection.


2019 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 74-81
Author(s):  
Анастасия Петухова ◽  
Anastasia Petukhova ◽  
Станислав Петухов ◽  
Stanislav Petukhov

We present and discuss properties of the following magnetic field models in a magnetic cloud: Miller and Turner solution, modified Miller–Turner solution, Romashets–Vandas toroidal and integral models, and Krittinatham–Ruffolo model. Helicity of the magnetic field in all the models is the main feature of magnetic clouds. The first three models describe the magnetic field inside an ideal torus. In the integral model, parameters of a generating torus ambiguously determine the volume and form of the magnetic field region. In the Krittinatham–Ruffolo model, the cross-section radius of the torus is variable, thereby it corresponds more closely to the real form of magnetic clouds in the inner heliosphere. These models can be used to interpret in-situ observations of the magnetic flux rope, to study a Forbush decrease in magnetic clouds and transport effects of solar energetic particles injected into a coronal mass ejection.


1967 ◽  
Vol 31 ◽  
pp. 381-383
Author(s):  
J. M. Greenberg

Van de Hulst (Paper 64, Table 1) has marked optical polarization as a questionable or marginal source of information concerning magnetic field strengths. Rather than arguing about this–I should rate this method asq+-, or quarrelling about the term ‘model-sensitive results’, I wish to stress the historical point that as recently as two years ago there were still some who questioned that optical polarization was definitely due to magnetically-oriented interstellar particles.


1967 ◽  
Vol 31 ◽  
pp. 375-380
Author(s):  
H. C. van de Hulst

Various methods of observing the galactic magnetic field are reviewed, and their results summarized. There is fair agreement about the direction of the magnetic field in the solar neighbourhood:l= 50° to 80°; the strength of the field in the disk is of the order of 10-5gauss.


1967 ◽  
Vol 31 ◽  
pp. 355-356
Author(s):  
R. D. Davies

Observations at various frequencies between 136 and 1400 MHz indicate a considerable amount of structure in the galactic disk. This result appears consistent both with measured polarization percentages and with considerations of the strength of the galactic magnetic field.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document