average magnetic field
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

23
(FIVE YEARS 5)

H-INDEX

10
(FIVE YEARS 1)

Author(s):  
Lei Tian ◽  
Limei Song ◽  
Yu Zheng ◽  
Jinhai Wang

Multi-coil magnetic stimulation has advantages over single-coil magnetic stimulation, such as more accurate targeting and larger stimulation range. In this paper, a 4 × 4 array multichannel magnetic stimulation system based on a submillimeter planar square spiral coil is proposed. The effects of multiple currents with different directions on the electromagnetic field strength and the focusing zone of the array-structured magnetic stimulation system are studied. The spatial distribution characteristics of the electromagnetic field are discussed. In addition, a method is proposed that can predict the spatial distributions of the electric and magnetic fields when currents in different directions are applied to the array-structured magnetic stimulation system. The study results show that in the section of z = 2 μm, the maximum and average magnetic field strengths of the array-structured magnetic stimulation system are 6.39 mT and 2.68 mT, respectively. The maximum and average electric field strengths are 614.7 mV/m and 122.82 mV/m, respectively, where 84.39% of the measured electric field values are greater than 73 mV/m. The average magnetic field strength of the focusing zone, i.e., the zone in between the two coils, is 3.38 mT with a mean square deviation of 0.18. Therefore, the array-structured multi-channel magnetic stimulation system based on a planar square spiral coil can have a small size of 412 μm × 412 μm × 1.7 μm, which helps improving the spatial distribution of electromagnetic field and increase the effectiveness of magnetic stimulation. The main contribution of this paper is a method for designing multichannel micro-magnetic stimulation devices.


2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 ◽  
pp. 1-11
Author(s):  
Davor Vinko ◽  
Domagoj Bilandžija ◽  
Vanja Mandrić Radivojević

Conventional magnetically coupled resonant wireless power transfer systems are faced with resonant frequency splitting phenomena and impedance mismatch when a receiving coil is placed at misaligned position. These problems can be avoided by using uniform magnetic field distribution at receiving plane. In this paper, a novel 3D transmitting coil structure with improved uniform magnetic field distribution is proposed based on a developed optimization method. The goal is to maximize the average magnetic field strength and uniform magnetic field section of the receiving plane. Hence, figures of merit (FoM1 and FoM2) are introduced and defined as product of average magnetic field strength and length or surface along which uniform magnetic field is generated, respectively. The validity of the optimization method is verified through laboratory measurements performed on the fabricated coils driven by signal generator at operating frequency of 150 kHz. Depending on the allowed ripple value and predefined coil proportions, the proposed transmitting coil structure gives the uniform magnetic field distribution across 50% to 90% of the receiving plane.


2020 ◽  
Vol 500 (2) ◽  
pp. 2732-2740
Author(s):  
Adela Kawka ◽  
Stéphane Vennes ◽  
Nicole F Allard ◽  
T Leininger ◽  
F X Gadéa

ABSTRACT We present an analysis of photometric, spectroscopic, and spectropolarimetric data of the nearby, cool, magnetic DZ white dwarf PM J08186−3110. High-dispersion spectra show the presence of Zeeman splitted spectral lines due to the presence of a surface average magnetic field of 92 kG. The strong magnesium and calcium lines show extended wings shaped by interactions with neutral helium in a dense, cool helium-rich atmosphere. We found that the abundance of heavy elements varied between spectra taken 10 years apart but we could not establish a time-scale for these variations; such variations may be linked to surface abundance variations in the magnetized atmosphere. Finally, we show that volume-limited samples reveal that about 40 per cent of DZ white dwarfs with effective temperatures below 7000 K are magnetic.


2016 ◽  
Vol 54 (1) ◽  
pp. 121-126 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gui-Xiang Liu ◽  
Li-Hua Shen ◽  
Wen-Yue Ma ◽  
Lin Yuan

2014 ◽  
Vol 313 ◽  
pp. 545-548 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xu-Hui Liu ◽  
Gui-Lian Zhang ◽  
Yong-Hong Kong ◽  
Ai-Hua Li ◽  
Xi Fu

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document