scholarly journals Early Phase 2 Results of LumiBelle2 for the SuperKEKB Electron Ring

2018 ◽  
Vol 1067 ◽  
pp. 072025
Author(s):  
S. Di Carlo ◽  
P. Bambade ◽  
D. Jehanno ◽  
V. Kubytskyi ◽  
C.G. Pang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase 2 ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 181-190 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hirofumi Komaki ◽  
Yoshihiro Maegaki ◽  
Tsuyoshi Matsumura ◽  
Kazuhiro Shiraishi ◽  
Hiroyuki Awano ◽  
...  

Trials ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Diana Ho ◽  
Brandon Towns ◽  
Erica N. Grodin ◽  
Lara A. Ray

Abstract Background Alcohol use disorder (AUD) is a highly prevalent, chronic relapsing disorder with a high disease burden in the USA. Pharmacotherapy is a promising treatment method for AUD; however, the few FDA-approved medications are only modestly effective. Medications development for AUD is a high priority research area, but the cumbersome drug development process hinders many potential compounds from reaching approval. One area with major opportunities for improvement is the process of screening novel compounds for initial efficacy, also known as early phase 2 trials. Early phase 2 trials incorporate human laboratory paradigms to assess relevant clinical constructs, such as craving and subjective responses to alcohol. However, these controlled paradigms often lack the ecological validity of clinical trials. Therefore, early phase 2 trials can be more efficient and clinically meaningful if they combine the internal validity of experimental laboratory testing with the external validity of clinical trials. To that end, the current study aims to develop and validate a novel early efficacy paradigm, informed by smoking cessation literature, to screen novel medications for AUD. As an established AUD medication, naltrexone will serve as an active control to test both the practice quit attempt model and the efficacy of a promising AUD pharmacotherapy, varenicline. Methods Individuals with current AUD reporting intrinsic motivation to change their drinking will complete a week-long “practice quit attempt” while on study medication. Participants are randomized and blinded to either naltrexone, varenicline, or placebo. During the practice quit attempt, participants will complete daily visits over the phone and fill out online questionnaires regarding their drinking, alcohol craving, and mood. Additionally, participants will undergo two alcohol cue-reactivity sessions. Discussion The successful completion of this study will advance medications development by proposing and validating a novel early efficacy model for screening AUD pharmacotherapies, which in turn can serve as an efficient strategy for making go/no-go decisions as to whether to proceed with clinical trials. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04249882. Registered on 31 January 2020.


2017 ◽  
Vol 28 ◽  
pp. v132
Author(s):  
Y. Kanjanapan ◽  
D. Day ◽  
M. Butler ◽  
L. Wang ◽  
A.M. Joshua ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

2001 ◽  
Vol 60 (4) ◽  
pp. 215-230 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jean-Léon Beauvois

After having been told they were free to accept or refuse, pupils aged 6–7 and 10–11 (tested individually) were led to agree to taste a soup that looked disgusting (phase 1: initial counter-motivational obligation). Before tasting the soup, they had to state what they thought about it. A week later, they were asked whether they wanted to try out some new needles that had supposedly been invented to make vaccinations less painful. Agreement or refusal to try was noted, along with the size of the needle chosen in case of agreement (phase 2: act generalization). The main findings included (1) a strong dissonance reduction effect in phase 1, especially for the younger children (rationalization), (2) a generalization effect in phase 2 (foot-in-the-door effect), and (3) a facilitatory effect on generalization of internal causal explanations about the initial agreement. The results are discussed in relation to the distinction between rationalization and internalization.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document