scholarly journals Analysis of junior high school students’ errors in solving HOTS geometry problems based on Newman’s error analysis

2019 ◽  
Vol 1321 ◽  
pp. 032131
Author(s):  
E Priliawati ◽  
I Slamet ◽  
I Sujadi
Keyword(s):  
High School ◽  
High School Students ◽  
Error Analysis ◽  
Junior High School ◽  
Junior High ◽  
Junior High School Students ◽  
School Students

scholarly journals Analysis of Student Errors in Completing PISA Content Space and Shape Problems Viewed from Vak Learning Style

MATHEdunesa ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
pp. 536-542
Author(s):  
Hanifah Kirania Ulfah ◽  
Yusuf Fuad
Keyword(s):  
High School ◽  
High School Students ◽  
Learning Styles ◽  
Error Analysis ◽  
Learning Style ◽  
Junior High School ◽  
Junior High ◽  
Junior High School Students ◽  
School Students ◽  
Kinesthetic Learning

Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study (TIMSS) study and the Program for International Student Assessment (PISA) is one of the principles in curriculum development in Indonesia. Judging from the results of the PISA study, the achievements obtained by Indonesian children especially in the aspects of mathematical literacy have not been satisfactory. The low achievement is inseparable from the learning process in schools, one of which students are not accustomed to solving questions with characteristics such as the PISA context. In addition, the way students absorb information also determines how learning achievements will be obtained by students. The way students learn is often referred to as a learning style. This indicates that the mathematics literacy of junior high school students in Indonesia is so weak that they still have difficulty in solving PISA questions. As a result, many mistakes were made by junior high school students when faced with PISA questions. The purpose of this study was to describe the errors of students with visual, auditory, and kinesthetic learning styles in solving space and shape content PISA questions. Students' errors were analyzed from the adaptation of Newman's error analysis model namely comprehension, transformation, proccess skills, and encoding. This type of research is qualitative descriptive. Data collection techniques that be used are tests and interviews. The results showed that students with visual learning styles tend to make mistakes in the transformation step. Whereas students with auditory learning styles tend to make mistakes in understanding and transformation steps, and students with kinesthetic learning styles make mistakes in the steps of understanding, transformation, and process skills. This shows that students who have kinesthetic learning styles do not have a tendency in one type of error. Keywords: Error analysis, PISA, VAK Learning Style  

scholarly journals Writing Error Analysis in Exposition Text of the EFL Junior High School Students

2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 517
Author(s):  
Umar Fauzan ◽  
Sapna Farah Aulya ◽  
Widya Noviana Noor
Keyword(s):  
High School ◽  
High School Students ◽  
Error Analysis ◽  
Junior High School ◽  
Qualitative Method ◽  
Junior High ◽  
Junior High School Students ◽  
Word Form ◽  
School Students ◽  
Verb Agreement

The objective of this research was to understand the writing error of eleventh-grade students of SMA Negeri 4 Samarinda. The descriptive qualitative method was used to examine the written exposition text made by 15 students. The data was collected from the participants’ writing on exposition text and analyzed based on the errors’ categorization. The result showed that there are 16 categories of errors found in the data. They were punctuation, missing word, capitalization, subject-verb agreement, pronoun agreement, spelling, singular or plural, unnecessary word, wrong word form, wrong word, wrong order, fragment, preposition, conjunction, article, and need-further support error. The error factors were intralingua transfer, interlingua transfer, and students’ lack of knowledge about writing.

Analysis on Reading and Writing Section of Test Items in 2009/2010 English National Final Examination (UAN) for Junior High School Students

2012 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Musarokah Siti ◽  
Dwi Anggani Linggar Bharati
Keyword(s):  
High School ◽  
High School Students ◽  
Junior High School ◽  
Junior High ◽  
Junior High School Students ◽  
Final Examination ◽  
School Students ◽  
Cognitive Domains ◽  
Reading And Writing ◽  
Test Items

ABSTRACT This paper attempts to analyze the test items in the English National Final Examination (UAN) for Junior High School Students in the academic year 2009/2010. This study aims at analyzing the compatibility of the test items of package A in reading and writing section of English National Final Examination for Junior High School Students with the standard of graduate competence and the cognitive domains used in the test. The data were collected by using documentary method, while in analyzing the data the writers focused on matching the compatibility of the test items with the Standard of Graduate Competence and identifying the cognitive domain used. From the analysis, it was found that the test items of package A in reading and writing section of English National Final Examination 2009/2010 were in line with the Standard of Graduate Competence (SKL) arranged by the government. The cognitive domains in reading section mostly used level of comprehension. The cognitive domains in writing section used the application and the synthesis level. ?é?á Key words: analysis, test items, national final examination

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document