scholarly journals Analysis of flip angle (fa) toward image anatomical information in sagital t2* w merge: (study of knee joint magnetic resonance imaging in anterior cruciate ligament tear case)

2021 ◽  
Vol 1943 (1) ◽  
pp. 012054
Author(s):  
D Dartini ◽  
A Deofantri ◽  
A N Kurniawan ◽  
A H Sulistiyadi ◽  
B D Handoko
2021 ◽  
Vol 18 (4) ◽  
pp. 604-609
Author(s):  
Vijayendra Adhikari ◽  
Amit Joshi ◽  
Nagmani Singh ◽  
Ishor Pradhan

Background: Anterior Cruciate Ligament Blumensaat line angle and Anterior Cruciate Ligament Inclination angle can be measured when Anterior Cruciate Ligament is visualized on Magnetic Resonance Imaging. Both these angles can be helpful to determine the intactness of Anterior Cruciate Ligament. The aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of Anterior Cruciate Ligament - Blumensaat line angle, apex of Anterior Cruciate Ligament - Blumensaat line angle and Anterior Cruciate Ligament - Inclination angle to determine the status of Anterior Cruciate Ligament in terms of tear or no tear. Methods: We conducted a prospective observational study with Magnetic Resonance Imagings of knees of 71 patients, who were divided into Anterior Cruciate Ligament tear and Anterior Cruciate Ligament intact groups based on Anterior Cruciate Ligament - Blumensaat line angle (<150- intact; ? 150 – torn Anterior Cruciate Ligament), Anterior Cruciate Ligament - Inclination angle (>450 – intact ACL; ? 450 – Anterior Cruciate Ligament tear) and apex of Anterior Cruciate Ligament - Blumensaat line angle ( apex towards femur – Intact Anterior Cruciate Ligament; apex towards tibia or parallel lines– Anterior Cruciate Ligament Tear) measured on MRI study. Diagnostic accuracy was calculated in terms of sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of Anterior Cruciate Ligament - Blumensaat line angle, Anterior Cruciate Ligament - Inclination angle and apex of Anterior Cruciate Ligament - Blumensaat line angle.Results: The sensitivity and specificity of Anterior Cruciate Ligament - Blumensaat line angle to detect Anterior Cruciate Ligament status was 95.83% and 95.35% respectively. Similarly, the sensitivity of Anterior Cruciate Ligament - Inclination angle was 95.83% and specificity was 95.35%. The sensitivity of Apex Anterior Cruciate Ligament - Blumensaat line angle to detect Anterior Cruciate Ligament tear on MRI was calculated to be 95.74% and a specificity of 87.5% Conclusions: Anterior Cruciate Ligament - Blumensaat line angle and Anterior Cruciate Ligament - Inclination angle is highly sensitive and specific for the diagnosis of Anterior Cruciate Ligament tear. Apex of Anterior Cruciate Ligament - Blumensaat line angle is also helpful in determination of Anterior Cruciate Ligament tear. Keywords: Anterior cruciate ligament; magnetic resonance imaging; ACL blumensaat line angle; ACL inclination angle


2018 ◽  
Vol 69 (9) ◽  
pp. 2498-2500
Author(s):  
Bogdan Sendrea ◽  
Antoine Edu ◽  
George Viscopoleanu

Magnetic resonance imaging has become the gold standard for soft tissue lesions evaluation especially after a traumatic event where there is need for diagnostic confirmation. The objective of the current paper was to evaluate the ability of magnetic resonance imaging in diagnosing soft tissue lesions in patients who underwent anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction compared with arthroscopic findings. Through the ability to diagnose soft tissue injuries, particularly meniscal lesions, magnetic resonance imaging should be considered as fundamental in guiding therapeutic management in patients with anterior cruciate ligament lesions.


2021 ◽  
pp. 194173812110295
Author(s):  
Patrick Ward ◽  
Peter Chang ◽  
Logan Radtke ◽  
Robert H. Brophy

Background: Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tears are common injuries; they are often associated with concomitant injuries to other structures in the knee, including bone bruises. While there is limited evidence that bone bruises are associated with slightly worse clinical outcomes, the implications of bone bruises for the articular cartilage and the risk of developing osteoarthritis (OA) in the knee are less clear. Recent studies suggest that the bone bruise pattern may be helpful in predicting the presence of meniscal ramp lesions. Evidence Acquisition: A literature review was performed in EMBASE using the keyword search phrase (acl OR (anterior AND cruciate AND ligament)) AND ((bone AND bruise) OR (bone AND contusion) OR (bone AND marrow AND edema) OR (bone AND marrow AND lesion) OR (subchondral AND edema)). Study Design: Clinical review. Level of Evidence: Level 4. Results: The literature search returned 93 articles of which 25 were ultimately included in this review. Most studies identified a high prevalence of bone bruises in the setting of acute ACL injury. Individual studies have found relationships between bone bruise volume and functional outcomes; however, these results were not supported by systematic review. Similarly, the literature has contradictory findings on the relationship between bone bruises and the progression of OA after ACL reconstruction. Investigations into concomitant injury found anterolateral ligament and meniscal ramp lesions to be associated with bone bruise presence on magnetic resonance imaging. Conclusion: Despite the ample literature identifying the prevalence of bone bruises in association with ACL injury, there is little evidence to correlate bone bruises to functional outcomes or progression of OA. Bone bruises may best be used as a marker for concomitant injury such as medial meniscal ramp lesions that are not always well visualized on magnetic resonance imaging. Further research is required to establish the longitudinal effects of bone bruises on ACL tear recovery. Strength of Recommendation Taxonomy: 2.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document