Peer review declaration

All papers published in this volume of Journal of Physics: Conference Series have been peer reviewed through processes administered by the Editors. Reviews were conducted by expert referees to the professional and scientific standards expected of a proceedings journal published by IOP Publishing. • Type of peer review: Single-blind / Double-blind / Triple-blind / Open / Other (please describe) Type of peer review: Single-blind • Conference submission management system: The Conference submission management system assumed interaction through the Conference website (https://gdp2021.uran.ru/) and the Conference e-mail box ([email protected]). • Number of submissions received: 140 • Number of submissions sent for review: 140 • Number of submissions accepted: 132 • Acceptance Rate (Number of Submissions Accepted / Number of Submissions Received X 100): 94 • Average number of reviews per paper: 2 • Total number of reviewers involved: 15 • Any additional info on review process: There is no any additional info on review process. • Contact person for queries: Name : Nikolay Zubarev Affiliation: Institute of Electrophysics, UB RAS, 620016, Ekaterinburg, Russia [email protected]

Download Full-text

Peer Review Declaration

IOP Conference Series Earth and Environmental Science ◽

10.1088/1755-1315/927/1/011002 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 927 (1) ◽

pp. 011002

Keyword(s):

Peer Review ◽

Environmental Science ◽

Review Process ◽

Similarity Score ◽

Acceptance Rate ◽

Analysis Techniques ◽

Email Address ◽

Check System ◽

Scientific Standards ◽

Single Blind

All papers published in this volume of IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science have been peer reviewed through processes administered by the Editors. Reviews were conducted by expert referees to the professional and scientific standards expected of a proceedings journal published by IOP Publishing. • Type of peer review : Single-blind • Describe criteria used by Reviewers when accepting/declining papers. Was there the opportunity to resubmit articles after revisions? ∘ The review was done by considering five (5) aspects : 1) Relevance with topics 2) Novelty and originality 3) Clarity 4) Systematic 5) Analysis techniques and deduction ∘ One reviewer gave points on each aspect between 1-4. Based on total points from those four aspects : 1) Definitely Accept : 16-20 2) Accept : 11-15 3) Possibly Accept : 7-10 4) Rejected : 5-6 ∘ There was an opportunity to resubmit articles after revisions. • Conference submission management system: The paper is uploaded via EDAS (https://edas.info/) • Number of submissions received : 70 papers • Number of submissions sent for review : 60 papers • Number of submissions accepted : 48 papers • Acceptance Rate (Number of Submissions Accepted / Number of Submissions Received X 100) : 68.57 • Average number of reviews per paper : 2 • Total number of reviewers involved : 36 • Any additional info on review process (eg Plagiarism check system) : ∘ The similarity score was checked by the editors to find the plagiarism using https://www.turnitin.com/. ∘ The standard similarity score to be accepted is less than 15%. • Contact person for queries (Full name, affiliation, institutional email address) : Name : Ayodya Pradhipta Tenggara Affiliation : Universitas Gadjah Mada Email address : [email protected]

Download Full-text

Peer review declaration

Journal of Physics Conference Series ◽

10.1088/1742-6596/2100/1/011002 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 2100 (1) ◽

pp. 011002

Keyword(s):

Peer Review ◽

High Temperatures ◽

Management System ◽

Review Process ◽

Acceptance Rate ◽

Contact Person ◽

Academy Of Sciences ◽

E Mail ◽

Scientific Standards ◽

Single Blind

All papers published in this volume of Journal of Physics: Conference Series have been peer reviewed through processes administered by the Editors. Reviews were conducted by expert referees to the professional and scientific standards expected of a proceedings journal published by IOP Publishing. • Type of peer review: Single-blind • Conference submission management system: Authors submitted abstract and papers using the conference website. • Number of submissions received: 57 • Number of submissions sent for review: 33 • Number of submissions accepted: 33 • Acceptance Rate (Number of Submissions Accepted / Number of Submissions Received X 100): 100 • Average number of reviews per paper: 2 • Total number of reviewers involved:38 • Any additional info on review process: Each paper was considered by 2 reviewers at least. Most of the papers had been sent for revision and some of them for revision more than once. • Contact person for queries: Name : Valentin Bityurin, e-mail: Affiliation: Joint Institute for High Temperatures of the Russian Academy of Sciences (JIHT RAS) Email : [email protected]

Download Full-text

Peer Review Declaration

IOP Conference Series Earth and Environmental Science ◽

10.1088/1755-1315/908/1/011002 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 908 (1) ◽

pp. 011002

Keyword(s):

Peer Review ◽

Management System ◽

Environmental Science ◽

Review Process ◽

Acceptance Rate ◽

Contact Person ◽

Conference Series ◽

E Mail ◽

Scientific Standards ◽

Single Blind

All papers published in this volume of IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science have been peer reviewed through processes administered by the Editors. Reviews were conducted by expert referees to the professional and scientific standards expected of a proceedings journal published by IOP Publishing. • Type of peer review: Single-blind • Conference submission management system: submissions were received and handled via Conference e-mail: [email protected] • Number of submissions received: 65 • Number of submissions sent for review: 63 • Number of submissions accepted: 42 • Acceptance Rate (Number of Submissions Accepted / Number of Submissions Received X 100): 64.6% • Average number of reviews per paper: 2 • Total number of reviewers involved: 19 • Any additional info on review process: Each paper took 2 weeks for revisions after review; 2 rounds of the review process were applied. Contact person for queries: Name : Oleg A. Anenkhonov, Dr. Sci. (Biol.) Affiliation: Institute of General and Experimental Biology SB RAS Email : [email protected]

Download Full-text

Peer review declaration

IOP Conference Series Materials Science and Engineering ◽

10.1088/1757-899x/1213/1/011002 ◽

2022 ◽

Vol 1213 (1) ◽

pp. 011002

Keyword(s):

Peer Review ◽

Review Process ◽

Materials Science ◽

Quality Criteria ◽

Acceptance Rate ◽

Science And Engineering ◽

Materials Science And Engineering ◽

Scientific Standards ◽

Single Blind

All papers published in this volume of IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering have been peer reviewed through processes administered by the Editors. Reviews were conducted by expert referees to the professional and scientific standards expected of a proceedings journal published by IOP Publishing. • Type of peer review: Single-blind • Conference submission management system: All the manuscripts received form the authors were sent to the reviewers. Each manuscript was reviewed by one reviewer and re-checked by editor. All comments were sent back to the authors to let them make all corrections. The revised versions of manuscripts were checked and approved by editors. • Number of submissions received: 15 • Number of submissions sent for review: 15 • Number of submissions accepted:11 • Acceptance Rate (Number of Submissions Accepted/Number of Submissions Received X 100):73.3 • Average number of reviews per paper: 1 • Total number of reviewers involved:10 • Any additional info on review process: Reviewers considered manuscripts in accordance with: 1) Technical Criteria: scientific rigour, accuracy, correctness of selected methodology. 2) Quality Criteria: originality and novelty, clarity of motivation and results importance. 3) Presentation Criteria: clarity of expression, readability and completeness of presentation, quality of all presented data and figures. • Contact person for queries: Name: Sergey Dubinskiy Email: [email protected]

Download Full-text

Peer review declaration

Journal of Physics Conference Series ◽

10.1088/1742-6596/2058/1/011002 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 2058 (1) ◽

pp. 011002

Keyword(s):

Peer Review ◽

Review Process ◽

Evaluation Criteria ◽

Acceptance Rate ◽

English Version ◽

Registration Form ◽

Online Registration ◽

E Mail ◽

Scientific Standards ◽

Single Blind

On the following page you will find the declaration form. • Please answer each question. • You should submit the form along with the rest of your submission files. • The deadline is the submission date written in your publishing agreement. All conference organisers/editors are required to declare details about their peer review. We will published the information you provide as part of your proceedings. All papers published in this volume of Journal of Physics: Conference Series have been peer reviewed through processes administered by the Editors. Reviews were conducted by expert referees to the professional and scientific standards expected of a proceedings journal published by IOP Publishing. • Type of peer review: Single-blind Article evaluation criteria • The relevance of research • The work has not been previously published in either Russian or English version • Availability of references to contemporary topical works • Article formatting in accordance with the requirements of the journal • Consent to the requirement of the journal licensing rules After reviewing, there was an opportunity to submit articles with changes • Conference submission management system: Online registration form, with e-mail correspondence of the conference • Number of submissions received: 55 • Number of submissions sent for review: 55 • Number of submissions accepted:43 • Acceptance Rate (Number of Submissions Accepted / Number of Submissions Received X 100): 78 • Average number of reviews per paper: 1-2 • Total number of reviewers involved: 5 • Any additional info on review process: • Contact person for queries: Name : Klimentov Sergey Affiliation: National Research Nuclear University MEPhI Email : [email protected]

Download Full-text

Peer review declaration

IOP Conference Series Earth and Environmental Science ◽

10.1088/1755-1315/845/1/011002 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 845 (1) ◽

pp. 011002

Keyword(s):

Peer Review ◽

Environmental Science ◽

Review Process ◽

Scientific Journal ◽

Acceptance Rate ◽

Programme Committee ◽

Volume Editor ◽

E Mail ◽

Scientific Standards ◽

Single Blind

All papers published in this volume of IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science have been peer reviewed through processes administered by the Editors. Reviews were conducted by expert referees to the professional and scientific standards expected of a proceedings journal published by IOP Publishing. • Type of peer review: Single-blind peer review by two committee members • Conference submission management system: Submissions were received and handled via e-mail [email protected]. The initial submission were handled by the secretary of the committee Ivan Krivolapov or his affiliates. Further correspondence with the authors and reviewers was handled via the same email under the supervision of the volume editor Galina Korotkova. • Number of submissions received: 237 • Number of submissions sent for review: 180 • Number of submissions accepted: 161 • Acceptance Rate (Number of Submissions Accepted / Number of Submissions Received X 100): 68% • Average number of reviews per paper: 2,5 • Total number of reviewers involved: 50 • Any additional info on review process: All the submissions were reviewed in two round. • Prior to the conference, preliminary texts (in Russian or in English) and slides (in English) were reviewed by one of programme committee members, who are responsible for this particular session. • After the conference, authors of the reported studies were encouraged to submit full texts in English for publication in this volume. The independent referees (at least one per paper) reviewed all texts. The review process was supervised by the volume editor. The editor communicated to the authors all suggestions and comments from the referees. After the revision, the editor may submit the revised document to the reviewer to get the confirmation of successful revision. • Reviewers of the scientific journal “Vestnik Michurinskogo Gossudarstvennogo Agrarnogo Universiteta” contributed to the process. • Spell and style check was applied for all accepted papers. The specialist from the language and publishing departments of Michurinsk State Agricultural University were involved in this process. • Contact person for queries: Galina Korotkova, Ph.D., Vice-rector for Research and Development of Michurinsk State Agrarian University, co-editor of Vestnik of MGAU (Michurinsk, Russia), [email protected]

Download Full-text

Peer Review Declaration Form

Journal of Physics Conference Series ◽

10.1088/1742-6596/2091/1/011002 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 2091 (1) ◽

pp. 011002

Keyword(s):

Peer Review ◽

Review Process ◽

Acceptance Rate ◽

Email Address ◽

Trapeznikov Institute ◽

Check System ◽

And Mathematics ◽

Academy Of Sciences ◽

Scientific Standards ◽

Single Blind

All papers published in this volume of Journal of Physics: Conference Series have been peer reviewed through processes administered by the Editors. Reviews were conducted by expert referees to the professional and scientific standards expected of a proceedings journal published by IOP Publishing. • Type of peer review: Single-blind • Describe criteria used by Reviewers when accepting/declining papers. Was there the opportunity to resubmit articles after revisions? Reviewers used following criteria when accepting/declining papers: scientific merit (notably scientific rigour, accuracy and correctness); clarity of expression; communication of ideas; readability and discussion of concepts; sufficient discussion of the context of the work, and suitable referencing; originality; motivation; repetition, length of paper; presentation criteria (title, abstract, diagrams, figures, tables and captions, text and mathematics; conclusion) • Conference submission management system: https://uconfy.com/ • Number of submissions received: 146 • Number of submissions sent for review: 146 • Number of submissions accepted: 78 • Acceptance Rate (Number of Submissions Accepted / Number of Submissions Received X 100): 78/146=0.53 • Average number of reviews per paper: 2 • Total number of reviewers involved: 10 • Any additional info on review process: Plagiarism check system was used • Contact person for queries (Full name, affiliation, institutional email address) Vladimir Vishnevsky, V. A. Trapeznikov Institute of Control Sciences of Russian Academy of Sciences, 65 Profsoyuznaya street, Moscow 117997, Russia, [email protected]

Download Full-text

Peer review declaration

Journal of Physics Conference Series ◽

10.1088/1742-6596/2149/1/011002 ◽

2022 ◽

Vol 2149 (1) ◽

pp. 011002

Keyword(s):

Peer Review ◽

Management System ◽

Review Process ◽

Acceptance Rate ◽

Scientific Methods ◽

Scientific Standards ◽

Single Blind ◽

Review Criteria ◽

Submission Date

On the following page you will find the declaration form. • Please answer each question. • You should submit the form along with the rest of your submission files. • The deadline is the submission date written in your publishing agreement. All conference organisers/editors are required to declare details about their peer review. We will published the information you provide as part of your proceedings. All papers published in this volume of Journal of Physics: Conference Series have been peer reviewed through processes administered by the Editors. Reviews were conducted by expert referees to the professional and scientific standards expected of a proceedings journal published by IOP Publishing. • Type of peer review: Single-blind (please describe) Single-anonymous: authors’ identities are known to the reviewers, reviewers’ identities are hidden from authors • Conference submission management system: Via email messages between editor and authors and editor and reviewers. • Number of submissions received: 18 • Number of submissions sent for review: 18 • Number of submissions accepted:18 • Acceptance Rate (Number of Submissions Accepted / Number of Submissions Received X 100):100 • Average number of reviews per paper: 1.11 • Total number of reviewers involved:20 • Any additional info on review process: The following review criteria were suggested: • Are the scientific methods and assumptions valid and clearly outlined? • Are the results sufficient to support the interpretations and conclusions? • Is the overall presentation well structured and clear? • Is the description of experiments and calculations sufficiently complete and precise to allow their reproduction by fellow scientists (traceability of results)? • Are mathematical formulae, symbols, abbreviations, and units correctly defined and used? • Are the number and quality of references appropriate? • Contact person for queries: Name : Julian Gröbner Affiliation: Physikalisch-Meteorologisches Observatorium Davos, World Radiation Center (PMOD/WRC), Davos Dorf, Switzerland. Email :[email protected]

Download Full-text

Peer review declaration

Journal of Physics Conference Series ◽

10.1088/1742-6596/2057/1/011002 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 2057 (1) ◽

pp. 011002

Keyword(s):

Peer Review ◽

Review Process ◽

Acceptance Rate ◽

Double Blind ◽

Conference Series ◽

Academy Of Sciences ◽

Scientific Standards ◽

Single Blind ◽

Selection Of

All papers published in this volume of Journal of Physics: Conference Series have been peer reviewed through processes administered by the proceedings Editors. Reviews were conducted by expert referees to the professional and scientific standards expected of a proceedings journal published by IOP Publishing. Professional translators took part in the preparation of the articles to ensure the good quality of the language. All articles received professional proofreading, in accordance with the requirements of the publisher. The selection of papers was made on the basis of conference abstracts. Total number of contributions received: 275. On the recommendation of the organizing committee, the most significant contributions were proposed for publication in the Journal of Physics: Conference Series. • Type of peer review: Single-blind / Double-blind / Triple-blind / Open / Other (please describe): Double-blind for most articles and Triple-blind for articles with ambiguous reviews • Conference submission management system: ConfTool Pro 2.6.137 • Number of submissions received: 142 • Number of submissions sent for review: 142 • Number of submissions accepted: 142 • Acceptance Rate (Number of Submissions Accepted / Number of Submissions Received X 100): 100 • Average number of reviews per paper: 2.05 • Total number of reviewers involved: 21 • Any additional info on review process: only recommended by the organizing committee contributions were proposed for reviewing and publication in the Journal of Physics: Conference Series. • Contact person for queries: Maksim Sergeyevich Makarov, Kutateladze Institute of Thermophysics of the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, [email protected]

Download Full-text