scholarly journals Interaction of rotational discontinuities with energetic ions in the precursor of the Earth’s bow shock

2021 ◽  
Vol 2103 (1) ◽  
pp. 012015
Author(s):  
Julia A Kropotina ◽  
Anton V. Artemyev ◽  
Andrei M. Bykov ◽  
Dmitri L. Vainchtein

Abstract We combined in-situ solar wind observations by ARTEMIS and MMS missions with kinetic hybrid simulations to study the interaction of solar wind rotational discontinuities (RDs) with the foreshock of the Earth’s bow shock. We found that whistler modes excited by diffuse energetic particles were strongly coupled with RDs and lead to their temporary dissociation. At the same time, RDs trigger the steepening of whistler waves and the generation of ’shocklets’ - small localised shock-like structures, capable of trapping energetic particles and growing up by absorbing the particles energy.

1981 ◽  
Vol 86 (A6) ◽  
pp. 4493-4510 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. R. Anderson ◽  
G. K. Parks ◽  
T. E. Eastman ◽  
D. A. Gurnett ◽  
L. A. Frank

2018 ◽  
Vol 123 (1) ◽  
pp. 259-271 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. Mejnertsen ◽  
J. P. Eastwood ◽  
H. Hietala ◽  
S. J. Schwartz ◽  
J. P. Chittenden

2000 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
pp. 22-34 ◽  
Author(s):  
Iver H. Cairns ◽  
P. A. Robinson ◽  
G. P. Zank

AbstractType II and III solar radio bursts are associated with shock waves and streams of energetic electrons, respectively, which drive plasma waves and radio emission at multiples of the electron plasma frequency as they move out from the corona into the interplanetary medium. Analogous plasma waves and radiation are observed from the foreshock region upstream of Earth's bow shock. In situ spacecraft observations in the solar wind have enabled major progress to be made in developing quantitative theories for these phenomena that are consistent with available data. Similar processes are believed responsible for radio emissions at 2–3 kHz that originate in the distant heliosphere, from where the solar wind interacts with the local interstellar medium. The primary goal of this paper is to review the observations and theories for these four classes of emissions, focusing on recent progress in developing detailed theories for the plasma waves and radiation in the source regions. The secondary goal is to introduce and review stochastic growth theory, a recent theory which appears quantitatively able to explain the wave observations in type III bursts and Earth's foreshock and is a natural theory to apply to type II bursts, the outer heliospheric emissions, and perhaps astrophysicalemissions.


2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (3) ◽  
pp. 785-799 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Kis ◽  
M. Scholer ◽  
B. Klecker ◽  
H. Kucharek ◽  
E. A. Lucek ◽  
...  

Abstract. Field-aligned beams are known to originate from the quasi-perpendicular side of the Earth's bow shock, while the diffuse ion population consists of accelerated ions at the quasi-parallel side of the bow shock. The two distinct ion populations show typical characteristics in their velocity space distributions. By using particle and magnetic field measurements from one Cluster spacecraft we present a case study when the two ion populations are observed simultaneously in the foreshock region during a high Mach number, high solar wind velocity event. We present the spatial-temporal evolution of the field-aligned beam ion distribution in front of the Earth's bow shock, focusing on the processes in the deep foreshock region, i.e. on the quasi-parallel side. Our analysis demonstrates that the scattering of field-aligned beam (FAB) ions combined with convection by the solar wind results in the presence of lower-energy, toroidal gyrating ions at positions deeper in the foreshock region which are magnetically connected to the quasi-parallel bow shock. The gyrating ions are superposed onto a higher energy diffuse ion population. It is suggested that the toroidal gyrating ion population observed deep in the foreshock region has its origins in the FAB and that its characteristics are correlated with its distance from the FAB, but is independent on distance to the bow shock along the magnetic field.


Author(s):  
Liudmila Rakhmanova ◽  
Maria Riazantseva ◽  
Georgy Zastenker

Crossing the Earth’s bow shock is known to crucially affect solar wind plasma including changes in turbulent cascade. The present review summarizes results of more than 15 years of experimental exploration into magnetosheath turbulence. Great contributions to understanding turbulence development inside the magnetosheath was made by means of recent multi-spacecraft missions. We introduce the main results provided by them together with first observations of the turbulent cascade based on direct plasma measurements by the Spektr-R spacecraft in the magnetosheath. Recent results on solar wind effects on turbulence in the magnetosheath are also discussed.


Nature ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 561 (7722) ◽  
pp. 206-210 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. L. Turner ◽  
L. B. Wilson ◽  
T. Z. Liu ◽  
I. J. Cohen ◽  
S. J. Schwartz ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
C.-Philippe Escoubet ◽  

<p>Magnetosheath High Speed Jets (HSJs) are regularly observed downstream of the Earth’s bow shock. Determining their origin from spacecraft observations is however a challenge since (1) L1 solar wind monitors are usually used with their inherent inaccuracy when plasma and magnetic data are propagated to the bow shock, (2) the number of measurement points around the bow shock are always limited. Various mechanisms have been proposed to explain HSJs such as bow shock ripples, solar wind discontinuities, foreshock transients, pressure pulses or nano dust clouds and it is difficult to relate these to HSJs with the lack of simultaneous measurements near the bow shock and immediately upstream.  We will use a special Cluster campaign, where one spacecraft was lagged 8 hours behind the three other spacecraft, to obtain near-Earth solar wind measurements upstream of the bow shock, together with simultaneous measurements in the magnetosheath. The event of interest is first observed by ACE on 13 January 2019 as a short 10 minutes period of IMF-Bx dominant (cone angle around 140 deg.). This IMF-Bx dominant period is also observed, one hour later, by THEMIS B and C (ARTEMIS) and Geotail, which were at 60 and 25 R<sub>E</sub> from Earth on the dawnside. Cluster 1 and Cluster 2 just upstream of the bow shock, at 17 R<sub>E</sub> from Earth, observed also such IMF-Bx dominant period together with energetic ions reflected from the bow shock and foreshock transients. Preliminary analysis indicate that these transients would be hot flow anomalies. Finally, Cluster 3 and 4 and MMS1-4, a few R<sub>E</sub> from each other downstream of the shock, observed a turbulent magnetosheath with HSJs for 15 minutes. The HSJ characteristics are investigated with the constellation of 6 spacecraft, as well as their relation to hot flows anomalies observed upstream.</p>


2004 ◽  
Vol 22 (12) ◽  
pp. 4143-4151 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. G. Sibeck ◽  
K. Kudela ◽  
T. Mukai ◽  
Z. Nemecek ◽  
J. Safrankova

Abstract. We present a case study of Geotail, Interball-1, IMP-8, and Wind observations of density and magnetic field strength cavities excavated by the enhanced pressures associated with bursts of energetic ions in the foreshock. Consistent with theoretical predictions, the pressure of the energetic ions diminishes rapidly with upstream distance due to a decrease in the flux of energetic ions and a transition from near-isotropic to streaming pitch angle distributions. Consequently, the cavities can only be observed immediately upstream from the bow shock. A comparison of conditions upstream from the pre- and post-noon bow shock demonstrates that foreshock cavities introduce perturbations into the oncoming solar wind flow with dimensions smaller than those of the magnetosphere. Dayside geosynchronous magnetic field strength variations observed by GOES-8 do not track the density variations seen by any of the spacecraft upstream from the bow shock in a one-to-one manner, indicating that none of these spacecraft observed the precise sequence of density variations that actually struck the subsolar magnetopause. Key words. Interplanetary physics (energetic particles; planetary bow shocks) – Magnetospheric physics (solar wind-magnetosphere interactions)


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document