Peer Review Declaration

ADVANCED TRENDS IN CIVIL ENGINEERING (ATCE 2021) All papers published in this volume of Journal of Physics: Conference Series have been peer reviewed through processes administered by the Editors. Reviews were conducted by expert referees to the professional and scientific standards expected of a proceedings journal published by IOP Publishing. • Type of peer review: Single-blind/Double-blind/Triple-blind/Open/Other (please describe): Double-blind. Papers must be submitted electronically via: https://scopus-conf.ru/en/advanced-trends-in-sivil-engineering/. All submissions must come in PDF format, conform to the Conference Publishing template, and not exceed 14 pages (including figures, appendices and references). We also welcome survey papers with an increased page limit of up to 15 pages. Together with papers authors also must submit the registration form. Every participant in the conference served by this site, “in any capacity,” must maintain a login and password. The same login must be used for all conferences. Follow the link to register a login, to check and update your personal information, or to retrieve your password. To comply with the General Data Protection Regulation, the first time when you login to a new account, you will be directed to the required opt-in consent form before you can use your account in any capacity for products and services offered through this site. All papers submitted to the conferences supported by this site need to be prepared as compliant PDF files and must be formatted according to the template. • Conference submission management system: the papers were submitted via conference website • Number of submissions received: 61 submissions received • Number of submissions sent for review: 54 submissions were sent for review • Number of submissions accepted: 28 submissions were accepted • Acceptance Rate (Number of Submissions Accepted/Number of Submissions Received X 100): 45,9% • Average number of reviews per paper: 3 • Total number of reviewers involved: 40 • Any additional info on review process: All the papers submitted to the ADVANCED TRENDS IN CIVIL ENGINEERING (ATCE 2021) conferences pass the procedure of reviewing according to the order established by editorial board. All papers are reviewed three times by experts in relevant field. The reviewing process took 40 days. The revised papers were also checked by Editors. All accepted papers meet the following criteria: - Scientific merit and quality of data presented; - Relevance of study to the conference topics; - No plagiarism and autoplagiarism; - Adequate paper structure; - Good English. Members of the editorial board and leading Russian and international experts in corresponding areas of life sciences, invited as independent readers, perform peer reviews. Conference Editors choose readers for peer review. In the case of the manuscript relevance to the conference profile, established rules and requirements, it is accepted by the editorial board and is sent for the reviewing. Otherwise the article is rejected without further reviewing. Reviewers prepare reviews of articles on a voluntary basis. Reviewers should submit their reviews in a scanned form. The reviewer makes a conclusion about the possibility of publishing an article: • “recommended for publication” • “recommended taking into account the correction of the comments made by the reviewer” • “article must be sent for revision” • “not recommended for publication”. The articles are reviewed and accepted only after at least two positive reviews of three reviewers. After making a decision by the editorial board of the conference to admit the article for publication, the author is informed about it. • Contact person for queries: Name: Sergey Klyuev Affiliation: Candidate of Engineering Sciences (PhD), Associate Professor, Belgorod State Technological University named after V.G. Shukhov Email: [email protected]

Download Full-text

Peer review declaration

Journal of Physics Conference Series ◽

10.1088/1742-6596/2061/1/011002 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 2061 (1) ◽

pp. 011002

Keyword(s):

Peer Review ◽

Review Process ◽

Technical Information ◽

Associate Professor ◽

Program Committee ◽

Final Decision ◽

State University ◽

Double Blind ◽

E Mail

Abstract All conference organisers/editors are required to declare details about their peer review. Therefore, please provide the following information: • Type of peer review: Double-blind peer review • Review criteria: Consistency with the conference scope and JPCS fields of interests; Technical content; Presentation style and clarity; Academic value. Each position was assessed with the following scale: Unsatisfactory, To be Improved, Good Enough. All papers marked as unsatisfactory by two referees were declined, all other papers were either accepted as is or send for the revision. Editorial board is responsible for the final decision regarding the publishing of manuscripts. • Conference submission management system: submissions were received and handled via e-mail • Number of submissions received: 262 • Number of submissions sent for review: 181 • Number of submissions accepted: 153 • Acceptance Rate (Number of Submissions Accepted / Number of Submissions Received X 100): 60% • Average number of reviews per paper: 3 • Total number of reviewers involved: 29 • Any additional info on review process: three independent peers, one of whom invited from outside the committee were assigned to each paper. The editors supervised the review process. Contact person for queries: Igor Boychuk , co-chairman of the organizing committee, co-editor, associate professor of Admiral Ushakov State Maritime University, Novorossiysk, Russia. E-mail: [email protected]. Sergey Bakhmutov , co-chairman of the program committee, co-editor, vice executive office for research and development of Central Scientific Research Automobile and Automotive Engines Institute (FSUE “NAMI”), Moscow, Russia. E-mail: [email protected]. Artyom Butsanets , secretary of the editorial board, head of the department of intellectual property and technical information, Admiral Makarov State University of Maritime and Inland Shipping, Saint Petersburg, Russia, [email protected].

Download Full-text

Peer review declaration

IOP Conference Series Earth and Environmental Science ◽

10.1088/1755-1315/919/1/011002 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 919 (1) ◽

pp. 011002

Keyword(s):

Peer Review ◽

Management System ◽

Environmental Science ◽

Assistant Professor ◽

Writing Quality ◽

Double Blind ◽

Peer Reviews ◽

Aquatic Resources Management ◽

Fish Product ◽

Pdf Format

Abstract All papers published in this volume of IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science have been peer reviewed through processes administered by the Editors. Reviews were conducted by expert referees to the professional and scientific standards expected of a proceedings journal published by IOP Publishing. • Type of peer review: Peer reviews are carried out in a double-blind manner by selected reviewers according to their fields of expertise • Conference submission management system: The symposium registration management system is carried out online through the website (http://ismfr-ugm.org/) created by the Department of Fisheries, Faculty of Agriculture, Gadjah Mada University, Indonesia which is hosted on a commercial hoster (niaga hoster). • Number of submissions received: 162 abstracts • Number of submissions sent for review: 69 articles • Number of submissions accepted: 67 articles • Acceptance Rate (Number of Submissions Accepted / Number of Submissions Received X 100): 67/69 x 100 = 97.10 • Average number of reviews per paper: 2 reviewers • Total number of reviewers involved: 18 reviewers • Any additional info on review process: Presenter who want to publish their manuscript to the ISMFR iop proceeding shall submit into ISMFR email. Authors must follow the manuscript writing format according to the guidelines listed on the symposium website. The papers were checked by the editor. Papers that do not match the format were returned to the author for correction. Formatted papers were sent to at least two reviewers to be assessed for content, especially based on the novelty, contribution to science, and writing quality. All accepted manuscripts then been sent back to the author for revision according to the reviewer comments, and sent back to the committee for final check by editor. The manuscripts were grouped into 3 main topic namely: aquaculture, aquatic resources management, and fish product technology. The final steps was proffread by the author, save as to pdf format, and send to IOP publishing. • Contact person for queries: Name : Indah Istiqomah, Ph.D Affiliation: Assistant Professor, Gadjah Mada University, Indonesia Email : [email protected]

Download Full-text

Peer review declaration

Journal of Physics Conference Series ◽

10.1088/1742-6596/2115/1/011002 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 2115 (1) ◽

pp. 011002

Keyword(s):

Peer Review ◽

Research Group ◽

Review Process ◽

Quality Criteria ◽

Associate Professor ◽

Acceptance Rate ◽

Double Blind ◽

Blind Review ◽

Scientific Standards ◽

Review Criteria

All papers published in this volume of Journal of Physics: Conference Series have been peer reviewed through processes administered by the Editors. Reviews were conducted by expert referees to the professional and scientific standards expected of a proceedings journal published by IOP Publishing. • Type of peer review: Double-blind • Conference submission management system: www.riact.co.in • Number of submissions received: 205 • Number of submissions sent for review: 123 • Number of submissions accepted:52 • Acceptance Rate (Number of Submissions Accepted / Number of Submissions Received X 100):25.36 • Average number of reviews per paper: 2 • Total number of reviewers involved:72 • Any additional info on review process: All papers had undergone plagiarism check and double-blind review by two reviewers. Based on the reviewer comments, revised manuscript were submitted by authors for final publication. Review criteria: 1. Technical Criteria (5 marks) 2. Plagiarism (5 marks) 3. Quality Criteria (5 marks) 4. Presentation Criteria (5 marks) 5. Based on reviewer and editor comments the authors are instructed to revise the accepted papers and instructed to submit the revised paper for JPCS. • Contact person for queries: Dr. AROCKIA SELVAKUMAR AROCKIA DOSS CONVENOR – RIACT 2021 SENIOR ASSOCIATE PROFESSOR, DESIGN AND AUTOMATION RESEARCH GROUP SCHOOL OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERING (SMEC) VIT CHENNAI, VANDALUR – KELAMBAKKAM ROAD MELAKOTTAIYUR, CHENNAI - 600 127. Mobile: 9962681933 Email: [email protected]

Download Full-text

Introducing the 1st Issue of the Nicholai Studies

The Nicholai Studies: International Journal for Research of Theological and Ecclesiastical Contribution of Nicholai Velimirovich ◽

10.46825/nicholaistudies/ns.2021.1.1.7-16 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol I (1) ◽

pp. 7-16

Author(s):

Srećko Petrović

Keyword(s):

Peer Review ◽

Publication Ethics ◽

Double Blind ◽

Internal Review

With the first issue of the new international journal dedicated to the research of Bishop Nicholai Velimirovich’s legacy, the circumstances and the context in which he lived and created, and the issues of reception of his ideas and his contribution, we would like to say a word on the main editorial and publishing policies. We fully endorse academic rules on publishing and publication ethics. Our journal is published both in English and Serbian language; we apply the double-blind unbiased peer-review, including internal review by the Editorial Board and external reviewers, experts on the topic.

Download Full-text

Peer Review Declaration

IOP Conference Series Earth and Environmental Science ◽

10.1088/1755-1315/964/1/011002 ◽

2022 ◽

Vol 964 (1) ◽

pp. 011002

Keyword(s):

Peer Review ◽

Environmental Science ◽

Ho Chi Minh City ◽

Scientific Content ◽

Double Blind ◽

English Writing ◽

University Of Technology ◽

National University ◽

Scientific Standards

All papers published in this volume of IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science have been peer reviewed through processes administered by the Editors. Reviews were conducted by expert referees to the professional and scientific standards expected of a proceedings journal published by IOP Publishing. • Type of peer review: Double-blind The reviewers accept or decline the manuscript based on the scope of the conference, the originality of idea, the scientific content of the work, and the English writing of the manuscript. The editorial board based on the recommendation of the reviewers, including Publishable without revision (No Revision), Publishable after a few revision (Minor Revision), Publishable only after correcting as recommended, HUGE Revision must be done (Major revision), and REJECT) to decide that the manuscript should be revised or rejected. Once rejected, there has not been any changed for resubmission. • Conference submission management system: https://conferences.hcmut.edu.vn/ICERES2021 • Number of submissions received: 127 (for the whole Conference), 70 (selected and invited for IOP submission). • Number of submissions sent for review: 70 • Number of submissions accepted: 33 • Acceptance Rate (Number of Submissions Accepted / Number of Submissions Received X 100): 47.1% • Average number of reviews per paper: 2.5 • Total number of reviewers involved: 71 (60 responded) • Any additional info on review process: None • Contact person for queries: Assoc. Prof. Dr. Vo Le Phu ([email protected]), Ho Chi Minh City University of Technology (HCMUT) – Vietnam National University Ho Chi Minh City.

Download Full-text

Peer review declaration

Journal of Physics Conference Series ◽

10.1088/1742-6596/2089/1/011002 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 2089 (1) ◽

pp. 011002

Keyword(s):

Peer Review ◽

Review Process ◽

Subject Area ◽

Associate Professor ◽

Acceptance Rate ◽

Double Blind ◽

Review Reports ◽

College Of Engineering ◽

Scientific Standards ◽

Revise Version

All papers published in this volume of Journal of Physics: Conference Serieshave been peer reviewed through processes administered by the Editors. Reviews were conducted by expert referees to the professional and scientific standards expected of a proceedings journal published by IOP Publishing. • Type of peer review: Double-blind • Conference submission management system: easychair.org • Number of submissions received: 575 • Number of submissions sent for review: 461 • Number of submissions accepted: 83 • Acceptance Rate (Number of Submissions Accepted/Number of Submissions Received X 100): 14.43 % • Average number of reviews per paper: 02 • Total number of reviewers involved: 123 • Any additional info on review process: Step 1. Each of selected paper will be reviewed by two/three professional experts in the related subject area. Step 2. Review Reports received from the experts will be judged by one of the editors either Review Reports are logical or not? Step 3. If not logical, then editor can assign new reviewer or can also judge at his/her own. Step 4. If logical, then Review Reports will be sent to authors to modify the manuscript accordingly. Step 5. Authors will be required to revise their papers according to the points raised. Step 6. Revised version will then be evaluated by the editor for the incorporation of the points raised by the reviewers. Step 7. Then the editor will send the revised manuscript to the reviewers again for reevaluation. Step 8. If the reviewers approve the revise version of the manuscript, then will be accepted for publication • Contact person for queries: Dr C Kishor Kumar Reddy Associate Professor Stanley College of Engineering & Technology for Women Abids, Hyderabad, India - 500001 Email : [email protected]

Download Full-text