scholarly journals Peer review declaration

2021 ◽  
Vol 879 (1) ◽  
pp. 011002

On the following page you will find the declaration form. • Please answer each question. • You should submit the form along with the rest of your submission files. • The deadline is the submission date written in your publishing agreement. All conference organisers/editors are required to declare details about their peer review. We will published the information you provide as part of your proceedings. The 5th International Symposium of Sustainable Landscape Development (The 5th ISSLD) was held on 22-23 September 2020 in Bogor, Indonesia. All papers published in this proceeding have been peer-reviewed through a process managed by the Editor by involving reviewers from academics and professionals in the field of landscape architecture. • Type of peer review: Double-blind All papers were uploaded through the organizer’s website http://arl.faperta.ipb.ac.id/symposium. All papers passed a basic check of writing format, including size, margins, font type and size, manuscript structure, compliance with submission instructions, quality of English grammar, and plagiarism checks. Reviewers provided opportunities to Authors for correction of discrepancies in the writing format and English grammar and plagiarism. Papers that still did not meet the minimum 25% of plagiarism checks were rejected. We used a double-blind system for peer-review while keeping the identity of reviewers and authors anonymous. One external reviewer and one review editor staff member reviewed each paper using professional and scientific standards. The review process took approximately 30 days. The reviewers decided to accept or reject the paper along with the reasons. Editor sent forms of correction, acceptance, and rejection to the appropriate authors. • Submission management system: The submission was made through the ISSLD website management system at the address http://arl.faperta.ipb.ac.id/symposium developed by the ISSLD Operator. The submission, review, and acceptance systems were carried out through the website. Management of the website also includes: 1. Managing access of reviewers and editors to papers; 2. Automatic registration for ISSLD 3. Papers submission; 4. List of ISSLD every year; 4. Program book schedule of events, materials for Keynote and Invited Speakers, the title of the presentation, and presenter’s name. 5. Communication via email between the program committee, reviewers, and authors; 6. Preparation and Publication of conference programs; 7. All authors who submit papers are assumed to have accepted the terms of Publication License; 8. All requirements for papers, templates, and sample papers can be accessed for Author or aspiring writer. • Number of submissions received: 65 • Number of submissions sent for review: 56 • Number of submissions accepted: 46 • Acceptance Rate (Number of Submissions Accepted / Number of Submissions Received X 100): 82,14 • The average number of reviews per paper: 2 • Total number of reviewers involved: 14 • Any additional info on the review process: All papers have passed the English language check using Grammarly and plagiarism check using Turnitin • Contact person for queries: Name : Akhmad Arifin Hadi Affiliation: IPB University [email protected] [email protected]

2021 ◽  
Vol 938 (1) ◽  
pp. 011002

Abstract All papers published in this volume of EES have been peer reviewed through processes administered by the Editors. Reviews were conducted by expert referees to the professional and scientific standards expected of a proceedings journal published by IOP Publishing. • Type of peer review: Double-blind • Conference submission management system: MeisterTask CRM • Number of submissions received: 44 • Number of submissions sent for review: 36 • Number of submissions accepted: 22 • Acceptance Rate (Number of Submissions Accepted / Number of Submissions Received X 100): 50% • Average number of reviews per paper: 2 • Total number of reviewers involved: 5 • Any additional info on review process: Each article was checked for scientific content, quality of the English language and technical formatting. In the absence of a scientific component of an article, authors right to revision was rejected. In other cases, correction notes were sent to authors. • Contact person for queries: Anastasia Kulachinskaya, [email protected]


2021 ◽  
Vol 2131 (1) ◽  
pp. 011002

Abstract All papers published in this volume of Journal of Physics: Conference Series have been peer reviewed through processes administered by the Editors. Reviews were conducted by expert referees to the professional and scientific standards expected of a proceedings journal published by IOP Publishing. • Type of peer review: Single-blind / Double-blind / Triple-blind / Open / Other (please describe) An international scientific committee selected papers corresponding to the following criteria: a paper should have more than 8 pages and contain new scientific results, which are in the thematic area of the conference. Next, each selected paper underwent scientific peer review and technical check. The type of peer review was double-blind scientific peer review. At least 3 reviewers from different scientific organizations participated in the review of one paper. In case of disagreement between the reviewers, additional reviewers were involved. All papers are also checked for plagiarism, image quality and quality of the English language. • Conference submission management system: Open Journal System • Number of submissions received: 1240 • Number of submissions sent for review: 1157 • Number of submissions accepted: 493 Acceptance Rate (Number of Submissions Accepted / Number of Submissions Received X 100): 39.75 • Average number of reviews per paper: 3 reviewers per paper • Total number of reviewers involved: 132 • Any additional info on review process: Contact person for queries: Name: Vera Murgul Affiliation: Peter the Great St.Petersburg Polytechnic University, St. Petersburg, Russia Email: [email protected]


2022 ◽  
Vol 2160 (1) ◽  
pp. 011002

All conference organisers/editors are required to declare details about their peer review. Therefore, please provide the following information: • Type of peer review: Double-blind There were total 229 submissions, and only 197 papers have been send to the reviewers. The rest of papers were out of the scopes. All the accepted papers have been submitted to strict peer-review by 2-3 expert referees. • Conference submission management system: http://www.chairin.cn/login?conf=msee2021 • Number of submissions received: 229 • Number of submissions sent for review: 197 (submitted for publication) • Number of submissions accepted: 96 • Acceptance Rate (Number of Submissions Accepted/Number of Submissions Received X 100): 41% • Average number of reviews per paper: 2 • Total number of reviewers involved: 98 • Any additional info on review process: Reviewers will be asked to provide numerical ratings for the submissions on a scale from 1-5 on criteria such as relevance, reviewer’s confidence, technical soundness, originality of the presented work, paper organization, overall evaluation. In addition, reviewers will be asked to provide 2 sets of comments for each submission they review: (1) Comments for the Authors (2) Comments for the Technical Program Committee. • Contact person for queries: Ms Kun Zhang, Email: [email protected], Tel: 18163305570


2021 ◽  
Vol 2094 (1) ◽  
pp. 011002

III International Conference on Applied Physics, Information Technologies and Engineering (APITECH-III 2021), 24 September – 3 October 2021, Krasnoyarsk, Russian Federation All papers published in this volume of Journal of Physics: Conference Series have been peer reviewed through processes administered by the Editors. Reviews were conducted by expert referees to the professional and scientific standards expected of a proceedings journal published by IOP Publishing. • Type of peer review: Double-blind All papers came through the basic review which included an initial technical criteria check (paper field, structure of submission, adherence to the submission instructions, English language usage and a check for the similarity rate). Any papers out of the scope or containing plagiarism, including self-plagiarism, were rejected. We used a double-blind system for peer review; both reviewers’ and authors’ identities remained anonymous. The submitted papers were reviewed by at least two experts: one editorial staff member as well as at least one external reviewer. The third/fourth reviewer is involved in case two reviewers have disputes about the content of the papers or the authors do not agree with the review result. The review process took from 7 to 15 days as a rule. The reviews were conducted to the professional and scientific standards. The decision to accept or reject the paper was based on the suggestions of reviewers. Acceptance/rejecting notifications were sent to the corresponding author(s). • Conference submission management system: Conference submission is carried out through the conference management system which was developed by the Organizer. It easy to use, and has features to make it suitable for simultaneous conference calls. More than 23,500 registration forms have been already processed by the system which showed it stability and flexibility. The conference management system is integrated with the conference website of the Organizer which helps the Organizer to cope with the complexity of the submission, reviewing, refereeing and accepting processes. The current version supports: 1. management of the access of reviewers and editors to papers; 2. automatic registration for conferences and paper submission; 3. list of the current, forthcoming and held conferences with all necessary information; 4. list of all conference materials with online presentations and/or video reports of participants, list of published proceedings with direct links to publications and journals; 5. sending emails to programme committee members, reviewers and authors; 6. preparation and publishing of conference programmes; 7. all authors submitting the papers are assumed to accept the terms of Publication Licence; 8. all requirements for papers, templates and sample papers are accessible for the authors. • Number of submissions received: 615 • Number of submissions sent for review: 615 • Number of submissions accepted: 368 • Acceptance Rate (Number of Submissions Accepted/Number of Submissions Received X 100): 59 • Average number of reviews per paper: 2 • Total number of reviewers involved: 42 • Any additional info on review process: The Checklist for the reviewers included the following criteria: relevance to the scope of the conference topics, the scientific quality, assessing the errors, organisation of the paper, the title, the references, the level of the English language, the quality of the figures and tables, etc. The reviewers could give the following recommendation: to publish the paper as it is, to publish it after mandatory/optional minor/major revision, to reject the paper. • Contact person for queries: Anna Voroshilova, Krasnoyarsk Science and Technology City Hall, 61, Uritskogo Street, Krasnoyarsk, 660049, Russia, E-mail: [email protected]. Tel + 7 913 538 6990


2021 ◽  
Vol 941 (1) ◽  
pp. 011002

Abstract All papers published in this volume of IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science have been peer reviewed through processes administered by the Editors. Reviews were conducted by expert referees to the professional and scientific standards expected of a proceedings journal published by IOP Publishing. • Type of peer review: Double-blind • Conference submission management system: MeisterTask CRM • Number of submissions received: 72 • Number of submissions sent for review: 57 • Number of submissions accepted: 39 • Acceptance Rate (Number of Submissions Accepted / Number of Submissions Received X 100): 54% • Average number of reviews per paper: 2 • Total number of reviewers involved: 6 • Any additional info on review process: In general, each article was checked for scientific content, quality of the English language and technical formatting. Reviewers rated the following (5 excellent, 1 poor): Relevance to the themes; Contribution to academic debate; Structure of the paper; Standard of English; Appropriateness of abstract; Appropriateness and number of keywords; Appropriateness of the research/study method; Literature review; Relevance and clarity of drawings, graphs, and tables; Results and findings; Discussion and conclusions; Reference list. In the absence of a scientific component of an article, authors right to revision was rejected. In other cases, correction notes were sent to authors. • Contact person for queries: Anastasia Kulachinskaya, [email protected]


2021 ◽  
Vol 893 (1) ◽  
pp. 011003

All papers published in this volume of IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science have been peer reviewed through processes administered by the Editors. Reviews were conducted by expert referees to the professional and scientific standards expected of a proceedings journal published by IOP Publishing. • Type of peer review: Double-blind • Conference submission management system: we develop our submission system where the editors, the authors and the reviewers can access using their unique login password. • Number of submissions received: 311 abstracts • Number of submissions sent for review: 241 abstracts • Number of submissions accepted: 81 articles • Acceptance Rate (Number of Submissions Accepted/Number of Submissions Received X 100): 26% • Average number of reviews per paper: 2 reviews • Total number of reviewers involved: 34 reviewers • Any additional info on review process: - • Contact person for queries: Name : Dr Supari Affiliation : Center for Climate Change Informastion, Agency for Meteorology, Climatology and Geophysics Email : [email protected]; [email protected]


2021 ◽  
Vol 2077 (1) ◽  
pp. 011002

All papers published in this volume of Journal of Physics: Conference Series have been peer reviewed through processes administered by the Editors. Reviews were conducted by expert referees to the professional and scientific standards expected of a proceedings journal published by IOP Publishing. • Type of peer review: Double-blind • Conference submission management system: - • Number of submissions received: 38 • Number of submissions sent for review: 38 • Number of submissions accepted: 25 • Acceptance Rate (Number of Submissions Accepted / Number of Submissions Received X 100): 65,8 % • Average number of reviews per paper: 2 • Total number of reviewers involved: 23 • Any additional info on review process: • Contact person for queries: Name : Pozdeeva Ekaterina Affiliation: Engineer, State Marine Technical University, St.-Petersburg Email : [email protected]


2021 ◽  
Vol 2053 (1) ◽  
pp. 011002

All papers published in this volume of Journal of Physics: Conference Series have been peer reviewed through processes administered by the Editors. Reviews were conducted by expert referees to the professional and scientific standards expected of a proceedings journal published by IOP Publishing. • Type of peer review: Single-blind / Double-blind / Triple-blind / Open / Other (please describe) - All the review process was done single-blind through Microsoft CMT platform. Average three reviewers involved for each paper. In the CMT system, we provide each reviewer with a Review Questions form. • Conference submission management system: - Microsoft Conference Management Toolkit (CMT) • Number of submissions received: 36 • Number of submissions sent for review: 36 • Number of submissions accepted: 26 • Acceptance Rate (Number of Submissions Accepted / Number of Submissions Received X 100): 72.2 % • Average number of reviews per paper: 3 reviewers • Total number of reviewers involved: 53 • Any additional info on review process: No • Contact person for queries: Name : Assoc. Prof. Ir. Dr. Shamsul Sarip Affiliation: Universiti Teknologi Malaysia Email :[email protected]


2021 ◽  
Vol 2140 (1) ◽  
pp. 011002

All papers published in this volume of Journal of Physics: Conference Series have been peer reviewed through processes administered by the Editors. Reviews were conducted by expert referees to the professional and scientific standards expected of a proceedings journal published by IOP Publishing. Type of peer review: Double-blind • Conference submission management system: Information System “Conference” • Number of submissions received: 84 • Number of submissions sent for review: 65 • Number of submissions accepted: 39 • Acceptance Rate (Number of Submissions Accepted/Number of Submissions Received X 100): 46,4% • Average number of reviews per paper: 2 • Total number of reviewers involved: 4 • Any additional info on review process: uses double-blind review, which means that both the reviewer and author identities are concealed from the reviewers, and vice versa, throughout the review process. • Contact person for queries: Name : Yurchenko Alexey Affiliation: Professor, National Research Tomsk State University, 36, Lenin Avenue Tomsk RUSSIA Email : [email protected] ([email protected])


2021 ◽  
Vol 2134 (1) ◽  
pp. 011002

All papers published in this volume of Journal of Physics: Conference Series have been peer reviewed through processes administered by the Editors. Reviews were conducted by expert referees to the professional and scientific standards expected of a proceedings journal published by IOP Publishing. • Type of peer review: Double-blind • Conference submission management system: easychair.org • Number of submissions received: 63 • Number of submissions sent for review: 59 • Number of submissions accepted: 30 • Acceptance Rate (Number of Submissions Accepted / Number of Submissions Received X 100): 51% • Average number of reviews per paper: 2 • Total number of reviewers involved: 8 • Any additional info on review process: - • Contact person for queries: Name : Artem Kruglov Affiliation: Innopolis University Email : [email protected]


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document