scholarly journals Seismic Assessment and Retrofit Design of a School Building in Florence

Author(s):  
Gloria Terenzi ◽  
Caterina Bazzani ◽  
Iacopo Costoli ◽  
Stefano Sorace ◽  
Paolo Spinelli
Author(s):  
Enzo Martinelli ◽  
Ciro Faella ◽  
Emidio Nigro ◽  
Carmine Lima

<p>This paper summarizes the main features of the seismic retrofitting project of a school building located in Montella (AV), Italy. Specifically, it describes the as-built status in terms of structural organization, member detailing, and existing materials properties. Then, it outlines the main assumptions and results obtained from seismic analysis, of both as-built and retrofitted structure. Comments about the construction stage are also reported by describing the main operations put in place with the aim to realize the shear wall system, which is the main retrofitting intervention, and some local strengthening measures consisting in steel plating and jacketing of some underdesigned RC members. Some emphasis is placed on the realization of micro-piles and extra foundations of the aforementioned shear walls. Besides its specific interest, the reported project may be intended as representative of a wide class of seismic assessment and retrofitting projects that have been realized in Italy in the last decade.</p>


2021 ◽  
pp. 875529302110235
Author(s):  
Konstantinos A Skalomenos ◽  
Konstantinos E Morfidis ◽  
Vassilios A Lekidis ◽  
Stavros A Anagnostopoulos

This article presents the seismic assessment and retrofit design of an existing old building in Greece of great regional importance. The Building is the “Administration building of Kalamata” located in the city of Kalamata, capital of the Messinia Prefecture. The Building, the largest in the city, is a seven-floor reinforced concrete (r/c) structure with a basement built in 1974. The seismic assessment procedure is based on the provisions of the EN 1998-3 code and the Greek code for structural interventions “KAN.EPE.,” introducing several novelties that give solutions to difficult practical problems with respect to the modeling, the analysis methods, and performance evaluation framework. The article presents details of the Building’s modeling, description of the analyses, and the corresponding results, as well as the most efficient retrofitting schemes that fulfill the safety demands (i.e. performance level B or “Life safety” and performance level C or “Collapse prevention” according to KAN.EPE.), considering cost and minimal disturbance both for the superstructure and foundation interventions. While considering the various intervention solutions, it proceeds with new simplified ways that optimize the proposed solution. As such, it can be used as a paradigm for finding clever, practical, and at the same time economical solutions. An interesting characteristic of the Building is that it has been strengthened already after the damaging earthquake of 1986, but the new usage requirements raised questions about the adequacy of that earlier strengthening. Last, but not least, it must be mentioned that this building is unique in the sense that the main earthquake record (a strong motion accelerogram) obtained during the damaging 1986 Kalamata earthquake was at its basement. This record is also used for the assessment.


2018 ◽  
Vol 16 (11) ◽  
pp. 1573-1589 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hugo Rodrigues ◽  
André Furtado ◽  
Nelson Vila-Pouca ◽  
Humberto Varum ◽  
André R. Barbosa

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document