The Impact of a Regional Palliative Care Program on the Cost of Palliative Care Delivery

2000 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 181-186 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eduardo Bruera ◽  
Catherine M. Neumann ◽  
Bruno Gagnon ◽  
Carleen Brenneis ◽  
Hue Quan ◽  
...  
2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (27_suppl) ◽  
pp. 217-217
Author(s):  
Kathleen Dunn ◽  
Morgan Hannaford ◽  
Scott Hartman ◽  
Diane Denny, DBA ◽  
Timothy Holder MD

217 Background: A national network of five hospitals piloted the use of a patient reported outcomes tool as a means for referring patients to the palliative care program. An externally validated assessment tool that captures patients’ perceived symptom burden from baseline and every 21 days was used as means of identifying patients who might benefit from referral if they met the following criteria: six or > symptoms from 27 increasing in severity by two points or > since their last assessment and determined as having any stage cancer with metastatic disease, stage 3 not in remission, or stage 4 and not already enrolled in palliative care. The data generated from the pre and post referral assessments to the palliative care program was then used to measure the impact of the program on symptom burden for this group versus those patients referred to palliative care but electing not to engage. Methods: The patient population, identified as patients who took the assessment during a selected three-month period, was reviewed to identify two groups: those who were referred through the SIT process and subsequently joined the palliative care program, and those who were referred to palliative care but chose not to attend the appointment. Results were then reviewed for both groups for a six-month period, comparing the scores from the patients’ initial assessment and their subsequent assessment. The data from both groups was compared to identify changes in scores by symptom and overall average symptom scores and the cohorts reviewed for similarities and differences (age, gender, cancer type). Results: Out of the 27 symptoms the cohort electing to utilize palliative care had higher pre-referral scores than the comparison group; and their symptoms improved at a rate greater than those not seeking palliative care. The symptoms in which the greatest impact was experienced included: activity, appetite, drowsiness, sense of family, hope, mood, and sexual interest. Conclusions: Interventions from the Palliative Care program had a positive impact on symptom burden in comparison to the group that was referred for services but did not enter the program.


PEDIATRICS ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 137 (Supplement 3) ◽  
pp. 453A-453A
Author(s):  
Heidi Kamrath ◽  
Erin Osterholm ◽  
Rachael Stover-Haney ◽  
Jennifer Needle

2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 246-250
Author(s):  
Gobi Paramanandam ◽  
Barbara E. Volk-Craft ◽  
Rachel Mayer Brueckner ◽  
Theresa M. O'Sullivan ◽  
Erin Waters

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (31_suppl) ◽  
pp. 167-167
Author(s):  
Claire Barth ◽  
Isabelle Colombet ◽  
Pascale Vinant

167 Background: Despite being recommended early in the course of advanced cancer, palliative care (PC) referral remains often late. Taking into account limited PC resources, disease-specific referral criteria and models of care need to be explored. In a previous work, we showed that a weekly onco-palliative meeting (OPM) allowed earlier introduction of the PC team (PCT) and decreased aggressiveness of end-of-life (EOL) care1. We describe patient’s profile when first referred to this Integrated Onco-Palliative Care program (IOPC), the timing of the referral relatively to the course of his/her disease and the impact on the trajectory of EOL care. Methods: The IOPC of our University Hospital combined a weekly OPM, dedicated to patients with incurable diseases for whom goals and organization of care need to be discussed, and/or clinical evaluation with possible follow-up by the PCT. We retrospectively analysed all patients reported for the first time at OPM between 2011 and 2013. We calculated an index of precocity, defined as the ratio of time from the first referral to death and the time from the diagnosis of incurability to death, with values ranging from 0 (late referral) to 1 (early referral). Results: Of the 416 patients included, 57% presented with lung cancer, urinary carcinoma and sarcoma. At first referral to IOPC program, 76% were receiving chemotherapy, 63% were outpatients, 56% had a PS ≤ 2 and 46% had a serum albumin level > 35g/l. The median (1st-3rd quartile) index of precocity was 0.39 (0.16-0.72), ranging between 0.53 (0.20-0.79) (earliest, for lung cancer) to 0.16 (0.07-0.56) (latest, for prostate cancer). Among 367 decedents, 42 (13%) received chemotherapy within 14 days before death, 157 (43%) died in hospice care setting. Conclusions: Most patients first referred to IOPC were still under antitumoral treatment and had intermediate prognostic markers. However the time of referral between diagnosis of incurability and death is highly variable according to cancer type, and should probably be adapted while therapies progress.1 Colombet I, et al. Effect of integrated palliative care on the quality of end-of-life care: retrospective analysis of 521 cancer patients. BMJ Support Palliat Care. 2012;2(3):239–47


2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (4) ◽  
pp. 380-387 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bernita Armstrong ◽  
Bharat Jenigiri ◽  
Sadie P. Hutson ◽  
Peter M. Wachs ◽  
Camille Eckerd Lambe

2017 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
pp. 23-28 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dana Lustbader ◽  
Mitchell Mudra ◽  
Carole Romano ◽  
Ed Lukoski ◽  
Andy Chang ◽  
...  

2007 ◽  
Vol 34 (S 2) ◽  
Author(s):  
R Jox ◽  
S Haarmann-Doetkotte ◽  
M Wasner ◽  
GD Borasio

Author(s):  
Audrey J. Tan ◽  
Rebecca Yamarik ◽  
Abraham A. Brody ◽  
Frank R. Chung ◽  
Corita Grudzen

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document