Scaling Up and Out HIV Prevention and Behavioral Health Services to Latino Sexual Minority Men in South Florida: Multi-Level Implementation Barriers, Facilitators, and Strategies

2021 ◽  
Vol 35 (5) ◽  
pp. 167-179
Author(s):  
Audrey Harkness ◽  
Satyanand Satyanarayana ◽  
Daniel Mayo ◽  
Rosana Smith-Alvarez ◽  
Brooke G. Rogers ◽  
...  
2018 ◽  
Vol 16 (3) ◽  
pp. 237-249 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jessica Jaiswal ◽  
Marybec Griffin ◽  
Stuart N. Singer ◽  
Richard E. Greene ◽  
Ingrid Lizette Zambrano Acosta ◽  
...  

Background: Despite decreasing rates of HIV among many populations, HIV-related health disparities among gay, bisexual and other men who have sex with men persist, with disproportional percentages of new HIV diagnoses among racial and ethnic minority men. Despite increasing awareness of HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP), PrEP use remains low. In addition to exploring individual-level factors for this slow uptake, structural drivers of PrEP use must also be identified in order to maximize the effectiveness of biomedical HIV prevention strategies. Method: Using cross-sectional data from an ongoing cohort study of young sexual minority men (N=492), we examine the extent to which structural-level barriers, including access to health care, medication logistics, counseling support, and stigma are related to PrEP use. Results: While almost all participants indicated awareness of PrEP, only 14% had ever used PrEP. PrEP use was associated with lower concerns about health care access, particularly paying for PrEP. Those with greater concerns talking with their provider about their sexual behaviors were less likely to use PrEP. Conclusion: Paying for PrEP and talking to one’s provider about sexual behaviors are concerns for young sexual minority men. In particular, stigma from healthcare providers poses a significant barrier to PrEP use in this population. Providers need not only to increase their own awareness of and advocacy for PrEP as an effective risk-management strategy for HIV prevention, but also must work to create open and non-judgmental spaces in which patients can discuss sexual behaviors without the fear of stigma.


2021 ◽  
Vol Publish Ahead of Print ◽  
Author(s):  
Audrey Harkness ◽  
Elliott R. Weinstein ◽  
Pranusha Atuluru ◽  
Daniel Mayo ◽  
Ronald Vidal ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 25 (5) ◽  
pp. 653-664 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ashley E. Pérez ◽  
Kristi E. Gamarel ◽  
Jacob J. van den Berg ◽  
Don Operario

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Derek Dangerfield II ◽  
Charleen Wylie ◽  
Janeane Anderson

BACKGROUND Focus groups are useful to support HIV prevention research among U.S. subpopulations such as Black gay, bisexual, and other Black sexual minority men (BSMM). Virtual synchronous focus groups provide an electronic means to obtaining qualitative data and are convenient to implement. However, the protocols for conducting virtual, synchronous focus groups in HIV prevention research among BSMM are lacking. OBJECTIVE This paper describes the protocols and acceptability of conducting virtual, synchronous focus groups in HIV prevention research among BSMM. METHODS Data come from two studies in which eight virtual, synchronous focus groups among a sample of HIV-negative BSMM in urban U.S. cities such as Baltimore, MD, Los Angeles, CA, Atlanta, GA, and Chicago, IL were conducted (n=39). Participants were recruited from a combination of active and passive recruitment strategies and focus groups were conducted via Zoom. Both studies were stratified by age and included data come from 2 groups of BSMM 18-24, 5 groups of BSMM ages 25-34 and 1 group age 35 years and older. Participants were asked to complete an electronic satisfaction survey distributed to their email through a private email link. RESULTS The age of participants ranged from 18 to 44 years (M=28.3, SD=6.0). Most reported not preferring in-person focus group participation. Regarding virtual focus group participation, 86% reported that they “strongly agreed” that they were satisfied participating in a focus group online, the remainder reported “agree.” Regarding a preference of providing written informed consent, 33% reported “strongly disagree,” 13.3% reported “disagree,” and 36.7% reported “neither agree nor disagree.” Regarding privacy, most reported “strongly agree” or “agree” that their information was safe to share with other participants in the group. Regarding the incentive, 44.8% reported strongly agreeing that they were satisfied with the incentive and 51.7% reported ‘agree.” CONCLUSIONS Conducting virtual, synchronous focus groups in HIV prevention research among BSMM is feasible. However, careful consideration and attention to safety, privacy, and culture is necessary for optimal focus group participation. Focus group facilitators must be explicitly trained to build rapport, ensure privacy, thoroughly explain study goals and safety protocols, and manage focus groups among BSMM. Conducting virtual, synchronous focus groups could be a useful modality to recruit and engage BSMM who are otherwise hard-to-reach.


LGBT Health ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Graham T. DiGuiseppi ◽  
Jordan P. Davis ◽  
Ankur Srivastava ◽  
Eric K. Layland ◽  
Duyen Pham ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Audrey Harkness ◽  
Sierra A. Bainter ◽  
Noelle A. Mendez ◽  
Daniel Hernandez Altamirano ◽  
Conall O’Cleirigh ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 25 (3) ◽  
pp. 354-367
Author(s):  
Eva N. Woodward ◽  
Jessica L. Cunningham ◽  
Anthony W. P. Flynn ◽  
Ethan H. Mereish ◽  
Regina J. Banks ◽  
...  

LGBT Health ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (4) ◽  
pp. 190-197
Author(s):  
Evan A. Krueger ◽  
Ian W. Holloway ◽  
Marguerita Lightfoot ◽  
Andy Lin ◽  
Phillip L. Hammack ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document