Serum Concentration of Risperidone and Adverse Effects in Children and Adolescents

2017 ◽  
Vol 27 (2) ◽  
pp. 211-212 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amilton dos Santos-Júnior ◽  
Mariana Leite Tamascia ◽  
Raquel Lorenzetti ◽  
Osmar Henrique Della Torre ◽  
Lúcia Arisaka Paes ◽  
...  
2017 ◽  
Vol 37 (10) ◽  
pp. 989-989
Author(s):  
Mehmet Fatih Ceylan ◽  
Betül Erdogan ◽  
Selma Tural Hesapcioglu ◽  
Esra Cop

2019 ◽  
Vol 176 ◽  
pp. 108421 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lina Casadó ◽  
Juan Pedro Arrebola ◽  
Andrés Fontalba ◽  
Araceli Muñoz

Cephalalgia ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (7) ◽  
pp. 665-674
Author(s):  
Man Amanat ◽  
Mansoureh Togha ◽  
Elmira Agah ◽  
Mahtab Ramezani ◽  
Ali Reza Tavasoli ◽  
...  

Background Few migraine preventive agents have been assessed in a pediatric population. We evaluated the safety and efficacy of cinnarizine and sodium valproate for migraine prophylaxis in children and adolescents. Methods We carried out a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial in the Children’s Medical Center and Sina hospital, Tehran, Iran. Eligible participants were randomly assigned in 1:1:1 ratio via interactive web response system to receive either cinnarizine, sodium valproate, or placebo. The primary endpoints were the mean change in frequency and intensity of migraine attacks from baseline to the last 4 weeks of trial. The secondary endpoint was the efficacy of each drug in the prevention of migraine. The drug was considered effective if it decreased migraine frequency by more than 50% in the double-blind phase compared with the baseline. Safety endpoint was adverse effects that were reported by children or their parents. Results A total of 158 children participated. The frequency of migraine attacks significantly reduced compared to baseline in cinnarizine (difference: −8.0; 95% confidence interval (CI): −9.3 to −6.6), sodium valproate (difference: −8.3; 95% confidence interval: −9.3 to −7.2), and placebo (difference: −4.4; 95% confidence interval: −5.4 to −3.4) arms. The decrease was statistically greater in cinnarizine (difference: −3.6; 95% confidence interval: −5.5 to −1.6) and sodium valproate (difference: −3.9; 95% confidence interval: −5.8 to −1.9) arms, compared to placebo group. Children in all groups had significant reduction in intensity of episodes compared to baseline (cinnarizine: −4.6; 95% confidence interval: −5.2 to −4.0; sodium valproate: −4.0; 95% confidence interval: −4.8 to −3.3; placebo: −2.6; 95% confidence interval: −3.4 to −1.8). The decrease was statistically greater in cinnarizine (difference: −2.0; 95% confidence interval: −3.2 to −0.8) and sodium valproate (difference: −1.5; 95% confidence interval: −2.7 to −0.3) arms, compared to the placebo group. Seventy-one percent of individuals in the cinnarizine group, 66% of cases in the sodium valproate group, and 42% of people in the placebo arm reported more than 50% reduction in episodes at the end of the trial. The odds ratio for >50% responder rate was 3.5 (98.3% confidence interval: 1.3 to 9.3) for cinnarizine versus placebo and 2.7 (98.3% confidence interval: 1.0 to 6.9) for sodium valproate versus placebo. Nine individuals reported adverse effects (three in cinnarizine, five in sodium valproate, and one in the placebo group) and one case in the sodium valproate group discontinued the therapy due to severe sedation. Conclusion Cinnarizine and sodium valproate could be useful in migraine prophylaxis in children and adolescents. Trial registration: IRCT201206306907N4.


2002 ◽  
Vol 36 (11) ◽  
pp. 1692-1697 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jennifer L Baumgartner ◽  
Graham J Emslie ◽  
M Lynn Crismon

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the efficacy and tolerability of citalopram in children and adolescents. METHOD: Retrospective chart review of 17 outpatients treated with citalopram at a tertiary care center. Subjects were diagnosed with a depressive or anxiety disorder with or without comorbidities and may have received concurrent medications. The primary outcome measure was the Clinical Global Impression Improvement Scale (CGI-I). Secondary outcome measures were the Children's Depression Rating Scale—Revised (CDRS-R), Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology, and Screen for Child Anxiety-Related Emotional Disorders (SCARED). Adverse effects were assessed via chart documentation. RESULTS: Patients were treated with a mean citalopram dose of 22.4 ± 7.3 mg for 12 weeks. Thirteen patients (76%) had CGI-I scores ≤2: 8 of 12 patients with depression and 5 of 5 patients with an anxiety disorder. The mean time to response was 7.6 ± 3.6 weeks. Additionally, 6 of 8 patients had ≥50% reduction from baseline CDRS-R score, with 3 patients (38%) meeting criteria for remission. Three of 4 patients had a >50% reduction for baseline SCARED-parent score. Overall, adverse effects appeared minor and transient. One patient discontinued citalopram due to intolerable adverse effects, and 1 patient required dose reduction. CONCLUSIONS: Citalopram appears to be effective and well tolerated in this group of children and adolescents with depressive or anxiety disorders and a high degree of comorbidity. Controlled studies in this patient population are indicated.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document