Infertility Due to Prolonged Retention of Fetal Bones: A Case Series

Author(s):  
Ibraheem Olayemi Awowole ◽  
Olusegun O. Badejoko ◽  
Ekundayo O. Ayegbusi ◽  
Olubukola O. Allen ◽  
Olabisi Morebise Loto
2019 ◽  
Vol 27 (1) ◽  
pp. 55-58
Author(s):  
Leonardo Kurebayashi ◽  
Adauto Telino de Melo Junior ◽  
Fernando Brandão Andrade-Silva ◽  
Kodi Edson Kojima ◽  
Jorge dos Santos Silva

ABSTRACT Objective: There is no consensus in the literature regarding the time taken to remove antibiotic spacers in the treatment of bone infections. The aim of this study is to evaluate the clinical results of patients with prolonged retention of the same. Methods: Patients selected were diagnosed with post-osteosynthesis infection and/or osteomyelitis and were submitted to treatment using an orthopedic cement spacer (polymethylmethacrylate) with vancomycin, retaining it for a period of more than 12 months. They were clinically evaluated to determine the presence of local or systemic infectious signs via hemogram, investigations of inflammatory markers, liver, renal and, with radiographic control. Results: Eighteen patients were included in the study. The mean retention time of the spacer was 30.4 months (15 – 61 months). No patient had clinical signs of local or systemic infectious relapse at the time of evaluation. Seven patients (39%) presented non-disabling pain in the operated limb. Seventeen patients (94%) presented a reduction in C-reactive protein values compared to the preoperative period. Radiographically, no migration, no spacer failure, or bone sequestration occurred. Conclusion: In this retrospective case series, cement spacer retention with vancomycin for more than 12 months was associated with good clinical results, without relapse of the infectious condition. Nível de Evidência IV. Estudos Terapêuticos - Investigação dos Resultados do Tratamento.


2018 ◽  
Vol 24 ◽  
pp. 202-203
Author(s):  
Mireya Perez-Guzman ◽  
Alfredo Nava de la Vega ◽  
Arturo Pena Velarde ◽  
Tania Raisha Torres Victoria ◽  
Froylan Martinez-Sanchez ◽  
...  

VASA ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 39 (1) ◽  
pp. 43-53 ◽  
Author(s):  
Grotenhermen

Background: To investigate the hypothesis that cases of arteritis similar to thromboangiitis obliterans (TAO) and associated with the use of cannabis were caused by cannabis or THC (dronabinol), or that cannabis use is a co-factor of TAO. Patients and methods: A systematic review on case reports and the literature on so-called cannabis arteritis, TAO, and cardiovascular effects of cannabinoids was conducted. Results: Fifteen reports with 57 cases of an arteritis associated with the use of cannabis and two additional case series of TAO, in which some patients also used cannabis, were identified. Clinical and pathological features of cannabis-associated arteritis do not differ from TAO and the major risk factor of TAO, tobacco use, was present in most, if not in all of these cases. The proposed pathophysiological mechanisms for the development of an arteritis by cannabis use are not substantiated. Conclusions: The hypothesis of cannabis being a causative factor or co-factor of TAO or an arteritis similar to TAO is not supported by the available evidence. The use of the term “cannabis arteritis” should be avoided until or unless more convincing scientific support is forthcoming.


2009 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emilie Thomas ◽  
Joaquin Poundja ◽  
Alain Brunet ◽  
Jacques Tremblay

2017 ◽  
Vol 27 (2) ◽  
pp. 218-224 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sarah Schumacher ◽  
Felix Betzler ◽  
Robert Miller ◽  
Clemens Kirschbaum ◽  
Andreas Ströhle
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document