scholarly journals Integration of a Palliative Care Intervention into Community Practice for Lung Cancer: A Study Protocol and Lessons Learned with Implementation

2017 ◽  
Vol 20 (12) ◽  
pp. 1327-1337 ◽  
Author(s):  
Huong Q. Nguyen ◽  
Thomas Cuyegkeng ◽  
Tieu O. Phung ◽  
Karisa Jahn ◽  
Tami Borneman ◽  
...  
2018 ◽  
Vol 56 (5) ◽  
pp. 709-718 ◽  
Author(s):  
Huong Q. Nguyen ◽  
Nora Ruel ◽  
Mayra Macias ◽  
Tami Borneman ◽  
Melissa Alian ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 22 (S1) ◽  
pp. S-7-S-19
Author(s):  
Isaac S. Chua ◽  
Finly Zachariah ◽  
William Dale ◽  
Josephine Feliciano ◽  
Laura Hanson ◽  
...  

BMJ Open ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (11) ◽  
pp. e037759
Author(s):  
Daisuke Fujisawa ◽  
Shigeki Umemura ◽  
Ayumi Okizaki ◽  
Eriko Satomi ◽  
Takuhiro Yamaguchi ◽  
...  

IntroductionIt has been suggested that palliative care integrated into standard cancer treatment from the early phase of the disease can improve the quality of life of patients with cancer. In this paper, we present the protocol for a multicentre randomised controlled trial to examine the effectiveness of a nurse-led, screening-triggered, early specialised palliative care intervention programme for patients with advanced lung cancer.Methods and analysisA total of 206 patients will be randomised (1:1) to the intervention group or the control group (usual care). The intervention, triggered with a brief self-administered screening tool, comprises comprehensive need assessments, counselling and service coordination by advanced-level nurses. The primary outcome is the Trial Outcome Index of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy (FACT) at 12 weeks. The secondary outcomes include participants’ quality of life (FACT-Lung), depression (Patient Health Questionnaire-9), anxiety (Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7), illness perception (Prognosis and Treatment Perceptions Questionnaire), medical service use and survival. A mixed-method approach is expected to provide an insight about how this intervention works.Ethics and disseminationThis study has been approved by the Institutional Review Board of the National Cancer Center Japan (approval number: 2016-235). The findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications and conference presentations and will be reflected on to the national healthcare policy.Trial registration numberUMIN000025491.


Cancer ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 121 (20) ◽  
pp. 3737-3745 ◽  
Author(s):  
Virginia Sun ◽  
Marcia Grant ◽  
Marianna Koczywas ◽  
Bonnie Freeman ◽  
Finly Zachariah ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 9068-9068
Author(s):  
Marianna Koczywas ◽  
Mihaela C. Cristea ◽  
Karen L. Reckamp ◽  
Jay Thomas ◽  
Virginia Sun ◽  
...  

9068 Background: Palliative cancer care is the integration into cancer care of therapies that address multiple issues that cause suffering for patients and their families and impact their life quality. Challenges and barriers continue to hinder the integration of palliative care into comprehensive, ambulatory oncology care. This paper aims to describe how symptoms, distress, and quality of life (QOL) data from the usual care phase of a NCI-supported Program Project (P01) informed the development of an interdisciplinary palliative care intervention for patients with metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Methods: Patients receiving usual care for metastatic NSCLC were recruited into this prospective longitudinal study. A total of 130 patients with stage IV NSCLC were accrued, and 114 patients had evaluable data. Upon informed consent, patients completed outcome measures that assessed physical function/cognitive status, social activities and support, symptom characteristics, psychological distress, and overall QOL. Patient-reported outcomes were completed at baseline, 6, 12, and 24 weeks post-accrual. Results: Subjects were primarily female (64%), ranged in age from 40-84 years, and 39% were ethnic minorities. The majority were former smokers (66%). KPS, IADL, and Cognitive scores deteriorated significantly over time (p=.001, .009, and .042, respectively). Patients reported higher severity scores with symptoms such as dyspnea, fatigue, insomnia, lack of appetite, peripheral neuropathy, pain, dry skin, nail changes, and problems with sexual interest in all four time periods. Global Symptom Distress Index and Total Symptom score both significantly worsened at 24 weeks (p=.003 and .017, respectively). Physical Well-Being worsened significantly (p=.036), while overall QOL, spiritual well-being, and psychological distress scores remained statistically stable over time. Conclusions: Patients with metastatic NSCLC continue to experience high symptom burden and diminished physical well-being over time while receiving treatments. An interdisciplinary palliative care intervention is currently being tested to improve symptom burden and overall QOL.


2013 ◽  
Vol 14 (6) ◽  
pp. 736-744 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marianna Koczywas ◽  
Mihaela Cristea ◽  
Jay Thomas ◽  
Cassie McCarty ◽  
Tami Borneman ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 12097-12097
Author(s):  
Yoshihisa Matsumoto ◽  
Ayumi Okizaki ◽  
Daisuke Kiuchi ◽  
Shigeki Umemura ◽  
Takuhiro Yamaguchi ◽  
...  

12097 Background: The integration of palliative care into standard cancer treatment during the early phase of the disease can improve cancer patients’ quality of life (QOL). The current study examined the effectiveness of a nurse-led, screening-triggered, early specialized palliative care intervention program for patients (pts) with advanced lung cancer. Methods: Pts with advanced lung cancer undergoing initial chemotherapy were randomized (1:1) to the intervention group (IG) or the usual care group (UG) between January 2017 and September 2019. The intervention, which was triggered using by a brief, self-administered screening tool, comprised comprehensive need assessments, counseling, and service coordination by advanced-leveled nurses. The primary endpoint was the change from baseline of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy -Lung Trial Outcome Index (TOI) at week 12, and the secondary endpoints were TOI at week 20, depression (Patient Health Questionnaire-9), anxiety (Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7), and survival. Results: Pts were randomly allocated (102 for each group). The median age was 69 y (range, 27-91) and 77.5% were male. Seventy-two pts had extensive disease small-cell lung carcinoma and 132 Pts had stage IV non-small cell lung carcinoma. Because there was not a significant time-by-group interaction, we estimated main effects and the IG did not show a significant improvement in TOI from the baseline at week 12 and 20 compared to the UG (Mean group difference [the same applies hereafter] 2.13; 90% CI: -0.70, 4.95; P =.107, one-tailed). However, when we considered time-by-group interaction effects exploratorily, the IG did show significant improvement in TOI from baseline at week 20 compared to the UG (3.58; 90% CI: 0.15, 7.00; P = 0.043). There was no significant difference in change from baseline depression and anxiety between the two groups either at week 12 (depression −0.38; 95% CI: -1.81, 1.05; P = 0.60, anxiety -0.18; 95% CI: -1.45, 1.09; P = 0.78) or at week 20 (depression -1.27; 95% CI: -2.79, 0.25; P =.10, 1.26; 95% CI: -2.61, 0.09; P =.067). The 1-year survival rates were 49.5% (95% CI: 39.3, 58.9) in the IG and 43.4% (95% CI: 33.6, 52.8) in the UG. Conclusions: This trial failed to show statistical superiority of nurse-led, screening-triggered, early specialized palliative care intervention program over usual care, however, it’s possible delayed clinical benefits of improvement in QOL (TOI), depression and anxiety were suggested. The study design that some pts in the IG received later or no intervention, may dilute the difference of intervention between group differences. Further investigation, including the mixed method approach adopted in this study, is needed to uncover mediating factors for the effect of this low-cost, novel model of early palliative care. Clinical trial information: UMIN000025491.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document