Outcomes of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Protocols Versus Conventional Management in Patients Undergoing Bariatric Surgery

Author(s):  
Tamara Díaz-Vico ◽  
Yilon Lima Cheng ◽  
Steven P. Bowers ◽  
Lisa C. Arasi ◽  
Ryan M. Chadha ◽  
...  
2018 ◽  
Vol 14 (11) ◽  
pp. S152
Author(s):  
Kevin J Bree ◽  
John Mitko ◽  
Lala Hussain ◽  
George M Kerlakian ◽  
Kevin M Tymitz ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Jeremy Prout ◽  
Tanya Jones ◽  
Daniel Martin

This chapter focuses on aspects of anaesthesia for complex, major surgery such as hepatic resection and oesophagectomy. The theories and practice of enhanced recovery after surgery and perioperative optimisation with goal directed therapy are included here. The systemic impact of malignancy and its treatment modalities are also discussed. The practical and ethical aspects of organ transplantation are discussed. Anaesthesia for renal and hepatic transplant is described, as well as considerations for anaesthetising the transplant recipient for non-transplant surgery. Recognition of transurethral resection syndrome in urological surgery is potentially life-saving; causes, management and avoidance are discussed. The NICE criteria for performing bariatric surgery, types of surgery, and conduct of anaesthesia for this challenging patient group is also covered.


2019 ◽  
Vol 29 (4) ◽  
pp. 1134-1141 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tomasz Stefura ◽  
Jakub Droś ◽  
Artur Kacprzyk ◽  
Mateusz Wierdak ◽  
Monika Proczko-Stepaniak ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 40 (9) ◽  
pp. 2065-2083 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Thorell ◽  
A. D. MacCormick ◽  
S. Awad ◽  
N. Reynolds ◽  
D. Roulin ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Erik Stenberg ◽  
Luiz Fernando dos Reis Falcão ◽  
Mary O’Kane ◽  
Ronald Liem ◽  
Dimitri J. Pournaras ◽  
...  

Abstract Background This is the second updated Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS®) Society guideline, presenting a consensus for optimal perioperative care in bariatric surgery and providing recommendations for each ERAS item within the ERAS® protocol. Methods A principal literature search was performed utilizing the Pubmed, EMBASE, Cochrane databases and ClinicalTrials.gov through December 2020, with particular attention paid to meta-analyses, randomized controlled trials and large prospective cohort studies. Selected studies were examined, reviewed and graded according to the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) system. After critical appraisal of these studies, the group of authors reached consensus regarding recommendations. Results The quality of evidence for many ERAS interventions remains relatively low in a bariatric setting and evidence-based practices may need to be extrapolated from other surgeries. Conclusion A comprehensive, updated evidence-based consensus was reached and is presented in this review by the ERAS® Society.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document