Thoracoscopic Repair of Esophageal Atresia

Abstract Since the very beginning in 1999, thoracoscopic repair of esophageal atresia has become a gold standard in many pediatric surgery centers worldwide. Despite the advances in surgical technique, treatment of long-gap esophageal atresia still remains a challenge. The aim of this study is to assess whether the localization of esophageal stumps can predict number of stages needed to perform anastomosis. We analyzed video records of 21 patients who underwent staged thoracoscopic repair of long-gap esophageal atresia using internal traction technique. All procedures were performed by the same surgeon. We divided patients into two groups: first requiring single internal traction procedure, second who underwent multiple procedures. We assessed esophageal stump position in relation to thoracic vertebrae. The distance between stumps was measured in vertebral bodies. Mean distance between esophageal ends was 5.8 in single traction group. The distance between the stumps was significantly greater in multiple procedures group: 7.33 (P = 0.003). Patients who required multiple procedures had significantly lower localization of distal stump. Localization of proximal stump did not affect the possibility for anastomosis after single traction. Distance between both ends after internal traction was also significantly longer in multiple procedures group. Patients with lower localization of distal esophageal stump assessed during primary thoracoscopy are at higher risk for requiring multiple surgical procedures.

Download Full-text

Thoracoscopic Repair of Esophageal Atresia with Tracheoesophageal Fistula

Atlas of Pediatric Surgical Techniques ◽

10.1016/b978-1-4160-4689-9.00007-3 ◽

2010 ◽

pp. 59-65

Author(s):

Mark L. Wulkan

Keyword(s):

Esophageal Atresia ◽

Tracheoesophageal Fistula ◽

Thoracoscopic Repair

Download Full-text

DOZ047.82: Outcome of thoracoscopic repair of type C esophageal atresia: single-center experience from North Africa

Diseases of the Esophagus ◽

10.1093/dote/doz047.82 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 32 (Supplement_1) ◽

Author(s):

M Elbarbary ◽

A Shalaby ◽

M Elseoudi ◽

M Ragab ◽

A E Fares ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Minimally Invasive ◽

Esophageal Atresia ◽

Operative Time ◽

Primary Anastomosis ◽

Single Center Experience ◽

Resource Setting ◽

Thoracoscopic Repair ◽

Type C ◽

The Mean ◽

A Prospective Study

Abstract Background and Aim Thoracoscopic repair of esophageal atresia is gaining popularity worldwide owing to the availability of and advances in minimally invasive instruments. This report presents our early experience of thoracoscopic esophageal atresia repair (EA/TEF) in a single institute. Methods A prospective study on short-gap type C EA/TEF was conducted at Cairo University Specialized Pediatric Hospital from April 2016. The technique was standardized in all cases: patients placed in the fully prone position, and using a 5 mm 30° scope with 3 mm instruments and carried out by four experts in minimally invasive surgery. Data was collected to include patient demographics and operative time. The main outcome was survival. Secondary outcomes were leak rate and postoperative stricture. Results Over a period of 24 months (April 2016–April 2018) 136 cases of EA/TEF were admitted. Thoracoscopy was attempted in 76 cases. Thirty cases with pure atresia or long-gap anomaly were excluded from this study for gap length, leaving 46 (60%) nonconsecutive neonates who underwent thoracoscopic repair of their short-gap EA/TEF. Five cases (10.8%) were converted to open surgery via right thoracotomy. A primary anastomosis was possible in all cases, leaving the azygos intact. The mean age at operation was 8.7 days (range 2–32), the mean weight was 2.6 kg (range 1.8–3.6), and the mean operative time was 108.3 minutes (range 80–180). In the fully thoracoscopic patients the survival was 85.4% (n = 35). An anastomotic leak occurred in 17% (n = 7); it was managed conservatively in 2 and with esophagostomy and gastrostomy in 5 cases. Followup was at one week, one and three months postdischarge. A stricture developed in 5 (16.6%) of the 30 surviving patients who kept their native esophagus. Conclusions Thoracoscopic repair is a feasible alternative even in a low-resource setting. The better outcome compared to traditional open repair in our center may be due to patient selection bias.

Download Full-text