Comparing Doppler Echocardiography and Thermodilution for Cardiac Output Measurements in a Contemporary Cohort of Comatose Cardiac Arrest Patients Undergoing Targeted Temperature Management

Author(s):  
Johannes Grand ◽  
Jesper Kjaergaard ◽  
Christian Hassager ◽  
Jacob Eifer Møller ◽  
John Bro-Jeppesen
2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
J Grand ◽  
C Hassager ◽  
J Kjaergaard ◽  
JE Moller ◽  
J Bro-Jeppesen

Abstract Funding Acknowledgements Type of funding sources: None. Background Cardiovascular dysfunction is common after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). Cardiac output measurements can be used to guide treatment during post-resuscitation care and echocardiography allows noninvasive cardiac output estimation. Purpose The aim of the present study was to compare Doppler echocardiography (doppler_CO) with thermodilution using pulmonary artery catheters (PAC_CO) for cardiac output estimation in a large and consecutively included cohort of comatose OHCA-patients undergoing targeted temperature management (TTM). Methods Single-center substudy of 171 patients included in the TTM-trial randomly assigned to 33 or 36 degrees C for 24 hours after OHCA. We measured PAC_CO and doppler_CO simultaneously shortly after admission and again after 24 hours. Measurements and Main Results We excluded 19 (11%) patients without PAC-measurement and 31 (18%) without doppler-measurements resulting in 120 paired measurements at admission. Patients were 61 (±11) years old, 86% were men and 91% had a witnessed OHCA. At ICU-admission, PAC_CO was 4.81 (±1.81) L/min. and doppler_CO was 3.74 (±1.38) L/min., with a mean bias of 1.07 (±1.65) L/min (with 95% limits of agreement of –2.16 to 4.04) L/min. Examining the Bland-Altman plot, precision fell with higher cardiac output  (figure). A statistically significant, but moderate correlation was found between doppler_CO and PAC_CO at admission (r = 0.49), p < 0.0001). After 24 hours, PAC_CO was 4.63 (±1.38) L/min. and doppler_CO was 3.61 (±1.14) L/min, with a mean bias of 0.96 L/min. Assessing the change from admission to 24 hours, PAC_CO decreased averagely -0.12 (±2.22) L/min. and doppler_CO decreased -0.19 (±1.91) L/min. The changes from admission to 24 hours correlated between doppler_CO and PAC_CO (r = 0.55), p < 0.0001) with a mean bias of the changes of 0.07 L/min, with 95% limits of agreement of –3.76 to 3.91 L/min. Conclusions Changes in cardiac output during TTM may be evaluated with Doppler echocardiography with little mean bias compared to changes in CO measured with thermodilution, but relatively large changes are needed in the individual patient before it can be considered as real. Abstract Figure. Comparing Doppler vs. thermodilution


2019 ◽  
Vol 54 ◽  
pp. 65-73 ◽  
Author(s):  
Johannes Grand ◽  
John Bro-Jeppesen ◽  
Christian Hassager ◽  
Malin Rundgren ◽  
Matilde Winther-Jensen ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
pp. 088506662110189
Author(s):  
Merry Huang ◽  
Aaron Shoskes ◽  
Migdady Ibrahim ◽  
Moein Amin ◽  
Leen Hasan ◽  
...  

Purpose: Targeted temperature management (TTM) is a standard of care in patients after cardiac arrest for neuroprotection. Currently, the effectiveness and efficacy of TTM after extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) is unknown. We aimed to compare neurological and survival outcomes between TTM vs non-TTM in patients undergoing ECPR for refractory cardiac arrest. Methods: We searched PubMed and 5 other databases for randomized controlled trials and observational studies reporting neurological outcomes or survival in adult patients undergoing ECPR with or without TTM. Good neurological outcome was defined as cerebral performance category <3. Two independent reviewers extracted the data. Random-effects meta-analyses were used to pool data. Results: We included 35 studies (n = 2,643) with the median age of 56 years (interquartile range [IQR]: 52-59). The median time from collapse to ECMO cannulation was 58 minutes (IQR: 49-82) and the median ECMO duration was 3 days (IQR: 2.0-4.1). Of 2,643, 1,329 (50.3%) patients received TTM and 1,314 (49.7%) did not. There was no difference in the frequency of good neurological outcome at any time between TTM (29%, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 23%-36%) vs. without TTM (19%, 95% CI: 9%-31%) in patients with ECPR ( P = 0.09). Similarly, there was no difference in overall survival between patients with TTM (30%, 95% CI: 22%-39%) vs. without TTM (24%, 95% CI: 14%-34%) ( P = 0.31). A cumulative meta-analysis by publication year showed improved neurological and survival outcomes over time. Conclusions: Among ECPR patients, survival and neurological outcome were not different between those with TTM vs. without TTM. Our study suggests that neurological and survival outcome are improving over time as ECPR therapy is more widely used. Our results were limited by the heterogeneity of included studies and further research with granular temperature data is necessary to assess the benefit and risk of TTM in ECPR population.


Author(s):  
Thomas Hvid Jensen ◽  
Peter Juhl-Olsen ◽  
Bent Roni Ranghøj Nielsen ◽  
Johan Heiberg ◽  
Christophe Henri Valdemar Duez ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Transthoracic echocardiographic (TTE) indices of myocardial function among survivors of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) have been related to neurological outcome; however, results are inconsistent. We hypothesized that changes in average peak systolic mitral annular velocity (s’) from 24 h (h) to 72 h following start of targeted temperature management (TTM) predict six-month neurological outcome in comatose OHCA survivors. Methods We investigated the association between peak systolic velocity of the mitral plane (s’) and six-month neurological outcome in a population of 99 patients from a randomised controlled trial comparing TTM at 33 ± 1 °C for 24 h (h) (n = 47) vs. 48 h (n = 52) following OHCA (TTH48-trial). TTE was conducted at 24 h, 48 h, and 72 h after reaching target temperature. The primary outcome was 180 days neurological outcome assessed by Cerebral Performance Category score (CPC180) and the primary TTE outcome measure was s’. Secondary outcome measures were left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), global longitudinal strain (GLS), e’, E/e’ and tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE). Results Across all three scan time points s’ was not associated with neurological outcome (ORs: 24 h: 1.0 (95%CI: 0.7–1.4, p = 0.98), 48 h: 1.13 (95%CI: 0.9–1.4, p = 0.34), 72 h: 1.04 (95%CI: 0.8–1.4, p = 0.76)). LVEF, GLS, E/e’, and TAPSE recorded on serial TTEs following OHCA were neither associated with nor did they predict CPC180. Estimated median e’ at 48 h following TTM was 5.74 cm/s (95%CI: 5.27–6.22) in patients with good outcome (CPC180 1–2) vs. 4.95 cm/s (95%CI: 4.37–5.54) in patients with poor outcome (CPC180 3–5) (p = 0.04). Conclusions s’ assessed on serial TTEs in comatose survivors of OHCA treated with TTM was not associated with CPC180. Our findings suggest that serial TTEs in the early post-resuscitation phase during TTM do not aid the prognostication of neurological outcome following OHCA. Trial registration NCT02066753. Registered 14 February 2014 – Retrospectively registered,


2021 ◽  
pp. 001857872110323
Author(s):  
W. Anthony Hawkins ◽  
Jennifer Y. Kim ◽  
Susan E. Smith ◽  
Andrea Sikora Newsome ◽  
Ronald G. Hall

Background: Propofol is a key component for the management of sedation and shivering during targeted temperature management (TTM) following cardiac arrest. The cardiac depressant effects of propofol have not been described during TTM and may be especially relevant given the stress to the myocardium following cardiac arrest. The purpose of this study is to describe hemodynamic changes associated with propofol administration during TTM. Methods: This single center, retrospective cohort study evaluated adult patients who received a propofol infusion for at least 30 minutes during TTM. The primary outcome was the change in cardiovascular Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (cvSOFA) score 30 minutes after propofol initiation. Secondary outcomes included change in systolic blood pressure (SBP), mean arterial pressure (MAP), heart rate (HR), and vasopressor requirements (VR) expressed as norepinephrine equivalents at 30, 60, 120, 180, and 240 minutes after propofol initiation. A multivariate regression was performed to assess the influence of propofol and body temperature on MAP, while controlling for vasopressor dose and cardiac arrest hospital prognosis (CAHP) score. Results: The cohort included 40 patients with a median CAHP score of 197. The goal temperature of 33°C was achieved for all patients. The median cvSOFA score was 1 at baseline and 0.5 at 30 minutes, with a non-significant change after propofol initiation ( P = .96). SBP and MAP reductions were the greatest at 60 minutes (17 and 8 mmHg; P < .05 for both). The median change in HR at 120 minutes was −9 beats/minute from baseline. This reduction was sustained through 240 minutes ( P < .05). No change in VR were seen at any time point. In multivariate regression, body temperature was the only characteristic independently associated with changes in MAP (coefficient 4.95, 95% CI 1.6-8.3). Conclusion: Administration of propofol during TTM did not affect cvSOFA score. The reductions in SBP, MAP, and HR did not have a corresponding change in vasopressor requirements and are likely not clinically meaningful. Propofol appears to be a safe choice for sedation in patients receiving targeted temperature management after cardiac arrest.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document