scholarly journals 50th anniversary of the discovery of reverse transcriptase

2021 ◽  
Vol 32 (2) ◽  
pp. 91-97
Author(s):  
John M. Coffin

The simultaneous discovery in 1970 of reverse transcriptase in virions of retroviruses by Howard Temin and David Baltimore was perhaps the most dramatic scientific moment of the second half of the 20th century. Ten years previously, Temin’s observation of cells transformed by Rous Sarcoma virus led him to the conclusion that retroviruses replicate through a DNA intermediate he called the provirus. This heretical hypothesis was greeted with derision by fellow scientists; Temin and Baltimore performed a simple experiment, rapidly reproduced, and convincing to all. Its result was a major paradigm shift—reversal of the central dogma of molecular biology. It immediately grabbed the attention of both the scientific and lay press. It also came at a key time for cancer research, at the start of the “War on Cancer.” As a theoretical base and fundamental molecular tool, it enabled a decade of (largely fruitless) search for human oncogenic retroviruses but laid the foundation for the discovery of HIV 13 years later, leading to the development of effective therapy. I had the good fortune, as a student in Temin’s lab, to witness these events. I am honored to be able to share my recollection on the occasion of their 50th anniversary.

2000 ◽  
Vol 74 (7) ◽  
pp. 3245-3252 ◽  
Author(s):  
Susanne Werner ◽  
Birgitta M. Wöhrl

ABSTRACT The genes encoding the α (63-kDa) and β (95-kDa) subunits of Rous sarcoma virus (RSV) reverse transcriptase (RT) or the entire Pol polypeptide (99 kDa) were mutated in the conserved aspartic acid residue Asp 181 of the polymerase active site (YMDD) or in the conserved Asp 505 residue of the RNase H active site. We have analyzed heterodimeric recombinant RSV αβ and αPol RTs within which one subunit was selectively mutated. When αβ heterodimers contained the Asp 181→Asn mutation in their β subunits, about 42% of the wild-type polymerase activity was detected, whereas when the heterodimers contained the same mutation in their α subunits, only 7.5% of the wild-type polymerase activity was detected. Similar results were obtained when the conserved Asp 505 residue of the RNase H active site was mutated to Asn. RNase H activity was clearly detectable in αβ heterodimers mutated in the β subunit but was lost when the mutation was present in the α subunit. In summary, our data imply that the polymerase and RNase H active sites are located in the α subunit of the heterodimeric RSV RT αβ.


Virology ◽  
1975 ◽  
Vol 64 (1) ◽  
pp. 49-62 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert R. Friis ◽  
William S. Mason ◽  
Young C. Chen ◽  
Michael S. Halpern

2021 ◽  
Vol 218 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Olivier Elemento

In 1911, more than a century ago, Peyton Rous described a curious observation, later explained by a virus named for him that led to the discovery of oncogenes, the modern era of cancer research, and the emergent field of precision medicine (1911. J. Exp. Med. https://doi.org/10.1084/jem.13.4.397).


2008 ◽  
Vol 82 (17) ◽  
pp. 8592-8604 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kevin W. Chang ◽  
Jangsuk Oh ◽  
W. Gregory Alvord ◽  
Stephen H. Hughes

ABSTRACT We previously reported that a mutant Rous sarcoma virus (RSV) with an alternate polypurine tract (PPT), DuckHepBFlipPPT, had unexpectedly high titers and that the PPT was miscleaved primarily at one position following a GA dinucleotide by the RNase H of reverse transcriptase (RT). This miscleavage resulted in a portion of the 3′ end of the PPT (5′-ATGTA) being added to the end of U3 of the linear viral DNA. To better understand the RNase H cleavage by RSV RT, we made a number of mutations within the DuckHepBFlipPPT and in the sequences adjacent to the PPT. Deleting the entire ATGTA sequence from the DuckHepBFlipPPT increased the relative titer to wild-type levels, while point mutations within the ATGTA sequence reduced the relative titer but had minimal effects on the cleavage specificity. However, mutating a sequence 5′ of ATGTA affected the relative titer of the virus and caused the RNase H of RSV RT to lose the ability to cleave the PPT specifically. In addition, although mutations in the conserved stretch of thymidine residues upstream of the PPT did not affect the relative titer or cleavage specificity, the mutation of some of the nucleotides immediately upstream of the PPT did affect the titer and cleavage specificity. Taken together, our studies show that the structure of the PPT in the context of the cognate RT, rather than a specific sequence, is important for the proper cleavage by RSV RT.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document