Hypothesis Testing for the Long‐Run Coefficients β

Author(s):  
Søren Johansen
Keyword(s):  
Author(s):  
Patrick W. Kraft ◽  
Ellen M. Key ◽  
Matthew J. Lebo

Abstract Grant and Lebo (2016) and Keele et al. (2016) clarify the conditions under which the popular general error correction model (GECM) can be used and interpreted easily: In a bivariate GECM the data must be integrated in order to rely on the error correction coefficient, $\alpha _1^\ast$ , to test cointegration and measure the rate of error correction between a single exogenous x and a dependent variable, y. Here we demonstrate that even if the data are all integrated, the test on $\alpha _1^\ast$ is misunderstood when there is more than a single independent variable. The null hypothesis is that there is no cointegration between y and any x but the correct alternative hypothesis is that y is cointegrated with at least one—but not necessarily more than one—of the x's. A significant $\alpha _1^\ast$ can occur when some I(1) regressors are not cointegrated and the equation is not balanced. Thus, the correct limiting distributions of the right-hand-side long-run coefficients may be unknown. We use simulations to demonstrate the problem and then discuss implications for applied examples.


1997 ◽  
Vol 13 (5) ◽  
pp. 646-666 ◽  
Author(s):  
Valentina Corradi

The aim of this paper is to characterize and analyze long-run comovements among diffusion processes. Broadly speaking, if X = (X1,,X2,;t ≥ 0) is a nonergodic diffusion in R2, but there exists a linear combination, say, γ′X, that is instead ergodic in R, then we say there exists a linear stochastic comovement between the components of X. Linear diffusions exhibiting stochastic comovements admit an error correction representation. Estimation of γ and hypothesis testing, under different sampling schemes, are considered.


PsycCRITIQUES ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 57 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
David J. Pittenger
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document