scholarly journals Bereaved Family Cancer Caregivers’ Unmet Needs: Measure Development and Validation

2019 ◽  
Vol 54 (3) ◽  
pp. 164-175
Author(s):  
Youngmee Kim ◽  
Charles S Carver ◽  
Rachel S Cannady
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Needs Assessment ◽  
Family Caregivers ◽  
Unmet Needs ◽  
Strong Predictor ◽  
Extended Period ◽  
Index Patient ◽  
Cancer Caregivers ◽  
Bereaved Family

Abstract Purpose/Background Accumulating evidence shows that bereaved family caregivers report elevated distress for an extended period, which compromises their quality of life. A first step in the development of programs to enhance bereaved caregivers’ quality of life should be determining the needs they experience to manage the loss, and the needs that are not being satisfied. Thus, this study aimed to develop a new measure to assess unmet needs among bereaved family caregivers. Method The 20-item Needs Assessment of Family Caregivers-Bereaved to Cancer measure was developed and validated with bereaved cancer caregivers 5 (n = 159) and 8 (n = 194) years after the initial cancer diagnosis of the index patient, when stress in providing care to the patient was assessed. Results Exploratory factor analysis yielded two primary factors: unmet needs for reintegration and unmet needs for managing the loss. Bereaved caregivers who were younger and ethnic minority, and who had greater earlier perceived stress of caregiving, reported their needs were more poorly met (t > 2.33, p < .05). The extent to which bereaved caregivers’ needs to manage the loss were not perceived as being met was a consistent and strong predictor of poor adjustment to bereavement at both 5- and 8-year marks (t > 1.96, p < .05), beyond the effects of a host of demographic and earlier caregiving characteristics. Conclusion Findings support the validity of the Needs Assessment of Family Caregivers-Bereaved to Cancer and suggest that interventions to help bereaved caregivers manage the loss by assisting their transition to re-engagement in daily and social activities will benefit caregivers by mitigating bereavement-related distress years after the loss.

Prevalence and Predictors of Distress, Anxiety, Depression, and Quality of Life in Bereaved Family Caregivers of Patients With Advanced Cancer

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (3) ◽  
pp. 201-213 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karin Oechsle ◽  
Anneke Ullrich ◽  
Gabriella Marx ◽  
Gesine Benze ◽  
Feline Wowretzko ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Palliative Care ◽  
Depressive Symptoms ◽  
Family Caregivers ◽  
Advanced Cancer ◽  
Anxiety Symptoms ◽  
Bereaved Family ◽  
Severe Anxiety ◽  
Item Scale

Objective: To investigate prevalence and predictors of postloss distress, depressive and anxiety symptoms, and quality of life among bereaved family caregivers of patients with advanced cancer. Methods: Prospective multicenter study. Family caregivers (N = 160, mean age 56.8 years, 66% female) completed validated outcome measures (Distress Thermometer, Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7-item scale, Patient Health Questionnaire depression module 9-item scale, SF-8 Health Survey Questionnaire) 6 months after patient’s discharge or death at specialist inpatient palliative care ward. Results: Clinically relevant distress was observed in 82% with sadness (89%), exhaustion (74%), sleeping problems (68%), loneliness (53%), and sorrows (52%) being the most common distress-causing problems. Moderate/severe anxiety and depressive symptoms were observed in 27% and 35%, respectively. Compared to an adjusted norm sample, quality of life was significantly impaired with exception of “bodily pain” and physical component score. Preloss caregiving (odds ratio [OR] 2.195) and higher preloss distress (OR 1.345) predicted high postloss distress. Utilization of psychosocial support services (OR 2.936) and higher preloss anxiety symptoms (OR 1.292) predicted moderate/severe anxiety symptoms, lower preloss physical quality of life (OR 0.952), and higher preloss depressive symptoms (OR 1.115) predicted moderate/severe depressive symptoms. Conclusion: Preloss mental burden showed to be a consistent predictor for postloss burden and should be addressed during palliative care. Future research should examine specific caregiver-directed interventions during specialist palliative care.

The caregiver perspective: Advancing the understanding of cancer caregiving in the palliative care setting.

2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (34_suppl) ◽  
pp. 17-17 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martha Raymond ◽  
Margaret-Ann Simonetta
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Palliative Care ◽  
Focus Groups ◽  
Care Setting ◽  
Unmet Needs ◽  
Supportive Services ◽  
Caregiver Support ◽  
Palliative Care Setting ◽  
Cancer Caregivers

17 Background: 2018 data from the National Cancer Institute’s Surveillance, Epidemiology & End Results (SEER) Program estimates there are 15.5 million cancer survivors in the U.S. Throughout the care continuum, cancer caregivers provide invaluable support which greatly impacts and improves patient quality of life. In the palliative care setting caregiver support is vitally important, but many caregivers struggle to take care of their own needs and are not aware of supportive services. Our study explores the unmet needs of cancer caregivers in the palliative care setting. Methods: Over a two-year time period (2015-2017), our professional facilitator met with cancer caregivers in 32 states hosting nationwide focus groups. Primary goals were reaching caregivers in rural, urban, medically underserved, and community oncology settings to gain perspective from diverse populations. Focus groups were held in person and online via facetime conferencing. Results: 778 caregivers (42% male, 58% female) participated. 92% of caregivers did not feel comfortable defining palliative care nor did they realize the various supportive elements palliative care provides. 76% were extremely anxious during care transitions; 71% feel overwhelmed with daily caregiving tasks; 69% want to help make end of life decisions including advance directives in partnership with their loved one, but did not feel equipped to make tough decisions; 64% report lack of patient/caregiver centered communication with their healthcare team, including guidance on adverse effects and training for medical hands-on tasks. Conclusions: Caregivers in the palliative care setting need additional supportive services, effective interventions, and educational programs to meet their unmet needs. With additional support and awareness, enhanced quality of life for both caregiver and patient is possible. Our conversations with caregivers will continue as we increase palliative care awareness, collaborate with partners, develop meaningful programs, and expand our outreach to help meet the needs of caregivers in the palliative care setting.

scholarly journals Experiences of bereaved family caregivers with shared decision making in palliative cancer treatment: a qualitative interview study

2021 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sanne P. C. van Oosterhout ◽  
Daisy J. M. Ermers ◽  
Floor K. Ploos van Amstel ◽  
Carla M. L. van Herpen ◽  
Yvonne Schoon ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Decision Making ◽  
Family Caregivers ◽  
Shared Decision Making ◽  
Shared Decision ◽  
Patients With Cancer ◽  
Qualitative Interview Study ◽  
Bereaved Family ◽  
Life Prolongation

Abstract Background Patients with incurable cancer face complex medical decisions. Their family caregivers play a prominent role in shared decision making processes, but we lack insights into their experiences. In this study, we explored how bereaved family caregivers experienced the shared decision making process. Methods We performed a qualitative interview study with in-depth interviews analysed with inductive content analysis. We used a purposive sample of bereaved family caregivers (n = 16) of patients with cancer treated in a tertiary university hospital in the Netherlands. Results Four themes were identified: 1. scenarios of decision making, 2. future death of the patient 3. factors influencing choices when making a treatment decision, and 4. preconditions for the decision making process. Most family caregivers deferred decisions to the patient or physician. Talking about the patient’s future death was not preferred by all family caregivers. All family caregivers reported life prolongation as a significant motivator for treatment, while the quality of life was rarely mentioned. A respectful relationship, close involvement, and open communication with healthcare professionals in the palliative setting were valued by many interviewees. Family caregivers’ experiences and needs seemed to be overlooked during medical encounters. Conclusions Family caregivers of deceased patients with cancer mentioned life prolongation, and not quality of life, as the most important treatment aim. They highly valued interactions with the medical oncologist and being involved in the conversations. We advise medical oncologists to take more effort to involve the family caregiver, and more explicitly address quality of life in the consultations.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document