Restructuring: A Unified Liability Theory for Atrocity Speech Law
Chapter 11 explains that discrete fixes of individual atrocity speech offenses are not sufficient. It begins by considering the history of haphazard atrocity speech offense formulations and the resultant systemic incoherence in this area of law. From there, it considers how certain macro-structural changes can be made to realize the crucial speech-specific prevention, systematization, and expressive goals emphasized throughout this book. In the end, it proposes a “Unified Liability Theory” for atrocity speech law. That theory posits that the core atrocity offenses—genocide, crimes against humanity, and war crimes—should be methodically attached to each type of liability—inciting, speech (abetting a proposed new offense for noncatalytic speech), instigating, and ordering. And this proposed change can be operationalized via treaty and/or a modification of the Rome Statute, as well as any other relevant legal instruments. The chapter concludes with consideration of the theoretical and practical implications of this proposed change.