The Bologna Process and the Future of Clinical Education in Europe: A View from Spain

Author(s):  
DIEGO BLÁZQUEZ-MARTÍN
2010 ◽  
Vol 32 (4) ◽  
pp. 305-315 ◽  
Author(s):  
Madalena Patrício ◽  
Ronald M. Harden

Article considers the importance of professional training of students who will become managers in the future and will be the most important resource for the development of enterprises and organizations. It is also pointed out that the training of future managers should be carried out under any circumstances, regardless of economic crises or pandemics, as society in order to exist must produce material and intangible goods. It is noted that among the main reasons for the modern interpretation of the result of professional training in terms of competence / competencies should be noted: the presence of European and global tendency to integration, globalization of the world economy and harmonization of architecture of the European higher education system associated with the Bologna process; universalization of degrees, cycles of study, ensuring student and teacher mobility, international recognition of documents on education, the system of educational credits and their implementation; a certain terminological unification is also envisaged. However, we see that the basis of the manager's competence are professionally important qualities, which we interpret as special, specific to the individual subject of management activities properties, traits and psychologically determined characteristics that can harm the quality and effectiveness of this activity. Professionally important qualities have a direct impact on the effectiveness of professional activities. We add another parameter to the characteristics of professionally important qualities, namely – "quality of professional activity". A number of important professionally important qualities capable of properly forming the competence of the future manager are offered. In this case, these qualities can develop even with the use of distance learning. For their implementation it is envisaged to use certain forms of preparation and conduct of practical classes during the teaching of professional disciplines aimed at identifying already formed, or those that are just being formed professionally important qualities.


Author(s):  
Sjur Bergan ◽  
Liviu Matei

Abstract The future of the Bologna Process and the European Higher Education Area (EHEA) have been debated for more than 20 years (Bergan and Deca 2018). From the very start, even as the implementation of this continental-wide project in higher education got underway and in parallel to historical analyses (“looking back” too) that begun slowly to emerge, the future of the EHEA has been a constant preoccupation. It is perhaps in the nature of things that while the future can be close or distant, it never quite arrives, like a textitfata morgana, so that any discussion of “the future” can in principle be endless. Or, it could be that in this case discussions about the future indicate continuing uncertainty about the substance, shape and timeline of a European area for higher education. As we are completing the second decade of the Bologna Process and, if we take a formal approach, the first decade of the EHEA, this debate nevertheless takes on added urgency and includes some new elements. We are encouraged by the fact that few if any voices have been heard advocating an end to the EHEA. We therefore disregard this option here.


2009 ◽  
Vol 14 (4) ◽  
pp. 297-306 ◽  
Author(s):  
Edith Braun ◽  
Bernhard Leidner

This article contributes to the conceptual and empirical distinction between (the assessment of) appraisals of teaching behavior and (the assessment of) self-reported competence acquirement within academic course evaluation. The Bologna Process, the current higher-education reform in Europe, emphasizes education aimed toward vocationally oriented competences and demands the certification of acquired competences. Currently available evaluation questionnaires measure the students’ satisfaction with a lecturer’s behavior, whereas the “Evaluation in Higher Education: Self-Assessed Competences” (HEsaCom) measures the students’ personal benefit in terms of competences. In a sample of 1403 German students, we administered a scale of satisfaction with teaching behavior and the German version of the HEsaCom at the same time. Using confirmatory factor analysis, the estimated correlations between the various scales of self-rated competences and teaching behavior appraisals were moderate to strong, yet the constructs were shown to be empirically distinct. We conclude that the self-rated gains in competences are distinct from satisfaction with course and instructor. In line with the higher education reform, self-reported gains in competences are an important aspect of academic course evaluation, which should be taken into account in the future and might be able to restructure the view of “quality of higher education.” The English version of the HEsaCom is presented in the Appendix .


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document