scholarly journals Egg consumption and risk of type 2 diabetes: findings from 3 large US cohort studies of men and women and a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies

2020 ◽  
Vol 112 (3) ◽  
pp. 619-630 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jean-Philippe Drouin-Chartier ◽  
Amanda L Schwab ◽  
Siyu Chen ◽  
Yanping Li ◽  
Frank M Sacks ◽  
...  

ABSTRACT Background Whether egg consumption is associated with the risk of type 2 diabetes (T2D) remains unsettled. Objectives We evaluated the association between egg consumption and T2D risk in 3 large US prospective cohorts, and performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies. Methods We followed 82,750 women from the Nurses’ Health Study (NHS; 1980–2012), 89,636 women from the NHS II (1991–2017), and 41,412 men from the Health Professionals Follow-up Study (HPFS; 1986–2016) who were free of T2D, cardiovascular disease, and cancer at baseline. Egg consumption was assessed every 2–4 y using a validated FFQ. We used Cox proportional hazard models to estimate HRs and 95% CIs. Results During a total of 5,529,959 person-years of follow-up, we documented 20,514 incident cases of T2D in the NHS, NHS II, and HPFS. In the pooled multivariable model adjusted for updated BMI, lifestyle, and dietary confounders, a 1-egg/d increase was associated with a 14% (95% CI: 7%, 20%) higher T2D risk. In random-effects meta-analysis of 16 prospective cohort studies (589,559 participants; 41,248 incident T2D cases), for each 1 egg/d, the pooled RR of T2D was 1.07 (95% CI: 0.99, 1.15; I2 = 69.8%). There were, however, significant differences by geographic region (P for interaction = 0.01). Each 1 egg/d was associated with higher T2D risk among US studies (RR: 1.18; 95% CI: 1.10, 1.27; I2 = 51.3%), but not among European (RR: 0.99; 95% CI: 0.85, 1.15; I2 = 73.5%) or Asian (RR: 0.82; 95% CI: 0.62, 1.09; I2 = 59.1%) studies. Conclusions Results from the updated meta-analysis show no overall association between moderate egg consumption and risk of T2D. Whether the heterogeneity of the associations among US, European, and Asian cohorts reflects differences in egg consumption habits warrants further investigation. This systematic review was registered at www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero as CRD42019127860.

2018 ◽  
Vol 42 (5) ◽  
pp. S31 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tauseef Khan ◽  
Mobushra Tayyiba ◽  
Sonia Blanco Mejia ◽  
Fei Au-Yeung ◽  
Cyril Kendall ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 189 (20) ◽  
pp. E711-E720 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christine S. Tsilas ◽  
Russell J. de Souza ◽  
Sonia Blanco Mejia ◽  
Arash Mirrahimi ◽  
Adrian I. Cozma ◽  
...  

Diabetes Care ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 44 (9) ◽  
pp. 2173-2181 ◽  
Author(s):  
Seyed Mohammad Mousavi ◽  
Yahya Jalilpiran ◽  
Elmira Karimi ◽  
Dagfinn Aune ◽  
Bagher Larijani ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 149 (1) ◽  
pp. 106-113 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aurélie Ballon ◽  
Manuela Neuenschwander ◽  
Sabrina Schlesinger

ABSTRACT Background Epidemiologic studies have indicated that breakfast skipping is associated with risk of type 2 diabetes. However, the shape of the dose-response relation and the influence of adiposity on this association have not been reported. Objective We investigated the association between breakfast skipping and risk of type 2 diabetes by considering the influence of the body mass index (BMI). Methods In this systematic review and meta-analysis, PubMed and Web of Science were searched up to August 2017. Prospective cohort studies on breakfast skipping and risk of type 2 diabetes in adults were included. Summary RRs and 95% CIs, without and with adjustment for BMI, were estimated with the use of a random-effects model in pairwise and dose-response meta-analyses. Results In total 6 studies, based on 96,175 participants and 4935 cases, were included. The summary RR for type 2 diabetes comparing ever with never skipping breakfast was 1.33 (95% CI: 1.22, 1.46, n = 6 studies) without adjustment for BMI, and 1.22 (95% CI: 1.12, 1.34, n = 4 studies) after adjustment for BMI. Nonlinear dose-response meta-analysis indicated that risk of type 2 diabetes increased with every additional day of breakfast skipping, but the curve reached a plateau at 4–5 d/wk, showing an increased risk of 55% (summary RR: 1.55; 95% CI: 1.41, 1.71). No further increase in risk of type 2 diabetes was observed after 5 d of breakfast skipping/wk (P for nonlinearity = 0.08). Conclusions This meta-analysis provides evidence that breakfast skipping is associated with an increased risk of type 2 diabetes, and the association is partly mediated by BMI.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document