A Comparison of Medication Errors Under the University of Kentucky Unit Dose System and Traditional Drug Distribution Systems in Four Hospitals

1970 ◽  
Vol 27 (10) ◽  
pp. 802-814 ◽  
Author(s):  
Clifford E. Hynniman ◽  
Wayne F. Conrad ◽  
William A. Urch ◽  
Betty R. Rudnick ◽  
Paul F. Parker
1976 ◽  
Vol 10 (8) ◽  
pp. 458-462 ◽  
Author(s):  
James Farner ◽  
Charles I. Hicks

This investigation involves the impact of unit dose drug distribution systems upon nursing time involvement in medication related activities. Medication related activities included inventory and control, controlled substance activities, Kardex preparation, medication preparation, medication administration, and charting fulfillment. Two unit dose systems, one with a twenty-four hour medication supply and the other with a seventy-two hour medication supply were compared with a traditional drug distribution system using the time-motion study technique of work sampling. The traditional, twenty-four hour unit dose, and seventy-two hour unit dose required, respectively 3.22, 1.91, and 1.07 minutes per dose administered. The study found, using analysis of variance and t-tests, significant differences between the traditional and unit dose systems. The unit dose drug distribution systems significantly reduced nursing time involvement in controlled substance activities, medication preparation, medication administration, charting fulfillment, and total involvement in the medication cycle. Also, unit dose drug distribution systems might reduce nursing time involvement in inventory and controlled activities. In this study, the traditional system had an in-house pharmacy which assumed many inventory and control functions of the nurse that community pharmacies could not do under a traditional drug distribution system. Significant differences exist between unit dose drug distribution systems as shown in this study. Before implementing any unit dose drug distribution system, the pharmacist, nursing home administrator and director of nursing should examine the impact of any unit dose drug distribution system upon the medication cycle in their nursing home to maximize the benefits of unit dose drug distribution systems.


Author(s):  
Mohammad Eslami Jouybari ◽  
Fatemeh Izadpanah ◽  
Mina Amini

Background: Medical errors are one of the most common threats to patient safety. Medication errors have several consequences, including the increase in patients’ mortality, length of stay, and healthcare costs. Objectives: This study was conducted in Food and Drug Deputy of Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences (MAZUMS) to evaluate medication errors. Methods: This study was conducted by the Food and Drug Deputy of Mazandaran University on medication errors reported and received from affiliated hospitals during 2015-2018. The analysis was performed based on the cause of the error, the frequency of the drugs, routs of administration, and the type. Results: Out of 3033 reported cases, the results of data analysis indicated that the highest percentage of these errors was related to antibiotics (22.84%). According to the results, the most common type of error belonged to the incorrect drug (44.18%), incorrect dose (25.65%), and drug omission (16.68%). The most common cause of the errors was related to neglect and insufficient care by the medical team (38.24%) and no or incorrect mention of the details of prescribed medications (in Kardex, HIS, etc.) by nurses (14.96%). Conclusion: Regular in-hospital training for medical staff focused on teaching the standards required for the administration and use of various medications, and identification of common medication errors can prepare guidelines to reduce these errors in hospitals. Besides, providing measures such as electronic prescription and medication systems based on a unit-dose drug distribution system can also help reduce medication errors.


1986 ◽  
Vol 43 (11) ◽  
pp. 2771-2779
Author(s):  
Penny W. Lepinski ◽  
Thomas S. Thielke ◽  
D. Michael Collins ◽  
Alan Hanson

1970 ◽  
Vol 27 (6) ◽  
pp. 473-479
Author(s):  
Philip M. Moody ◽  
Ron M. Kisch ◽  
Jane VanWey ◽  
Clifford E. Hynniman ◽  
Paul F. Parker

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document