Implementation of the flipped residency research model to enhance residency research training

2019 ◽  
Vol 76 (9) ◽  
pp. 608-612 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kathryn A Morbitzer ◽  
Kamakshi V Rao ◽  
Denise H Rhoney ◽  
Ashley L Pappas ◽  
Emily A Durr ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Research Training ◽  
Pharmacy Practice ◽  
Research Process ◽  
Practice Research ◽  
Institutional Review Boards ◽  
Research Model ◽  
High Quality Research ◽  
Research Activities ◽  
Institutional Review ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Purpose The attainment of fundamental research skills to create and disseminate new knowledge is imperative for the advancement of pharmacy practice. Research training is an important component of postgraduate residency training; however, the traditional model of performing residency research has several limitations that have hindered the ability of residents to complete high-quality research projects. Therefore, our institution developed and implemented the flipped residency research model with the 2013–2014 pharmacy practice residency class. Summary The flipped residency research model modifies the research timeline to better align research activities with residents’ abilities at specific time points during the year. In the 4 years following implementation of the flipped residency research model, our institution found improvements in a number of areas pertaining to the research process compared with an evaluation of the 7 years prior to implementation. A decrease in the number of reviews required from institutional review boards was observed, resulting in improved institutional review board efficiency. The flipped residency research model also addressed limitations surrounding manuscript development and submission, as demonstrated by an improved publication rate. Additionally, residents who participated in the flipped residency research model self-reported increased comfort with research-related abilities associated with study design, implementation, manuscript development and submission, and biostatistics. Conclusion The modified research timeline of the flipped residency research model better aligns research activities with resident experiences and abilities. This realignment has translated to demonstrable impact in the success of residency projects and dissemination of results. Research is needed to investigate the impact of the flipped residency research model on longer term scholarly success.

Impact of Pharmacy Residency Research Training on Residents’ Actual Versus Perceived Ability and Interest to Identify and Solve Practice-Related Problems

2016 ◽  
Vol 29 (4) ◽  
pp. 421-426 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicole R. Pinelli ◽  
Andrea N. Sikora ◽  
Leigh A. Witherspoon ◽  
Kamakshi V. Rao ◽  
Denise H. Rhoney
Keyword(s):  
Residency Training ◽  
Research Productivity ◽  
Research Training ◽  
Medical Center ◽  
Academic Medical Center ◽  
Pharmacy Practice ◽  
Research Experience ◽  
Perceived Ability ◽  
Research Activities ◽  
The Impact

Purpose: The American Society of Health-System Pharmacists (ASHP) requires that accredited residency programs provide pharmacy residents the opportunity to perform a practice-based project. The objective of this study was to evaluate the impact of pharmacy residency research training on residents’ actual versus perceived ability to solve practice-related problems in their professional careers. Methods: This cross-sectional study surveyed postgraduate year 1 (PGY1) pharmacy practice residents who completed training at a large academic medical center between 2007 and 2013. The survey consisted of 3 areas of assessment, that is, (1) general demographics, (2) perceived research abilities, and (3) self-reported research productivity. Results: A total of 39 residents were eligible; of those, 27 completed the survey (69.2% response rate). Participants reported low perceived ability for conductance of some research activities including study design development, implementation, and publication. No association between perceived research ability and self-reported research productivity was found. Research experience prior to residency training strongly predicted for subsequent publication after completion of PGY1 residency training ( P < .0001). Conclusions: New training mechanisms may be needed to optimize research training that will provide residents with greater emphasis on areas of perceived deficiency.

scholarly journals Researchers’ perspectives on the role of study partners in dementia research

2014 ◽  
Vol 26 (10) ◽  
pp. 1649-1657 ◽  
Author(s):  
Betty S. Black ◽  
Holly Taylor ◽  
Peter V. Rabins ◽  
Jason Karlawish
Keyword(s):  
Academic Research ◽  
Research Participation ◽  
Research Process ◽  
Institutional Review Boards ◽  
Enrollment Decisions ◽  
Caregiver Support ◽  
Institutional Review ◽  
Dementia Research ◽  
Role Responsibilities

ABSTRACTBackground:Study partners for dementia research participants are vital to the research process, but little is known about their role, responsibilities, and experiences. Study partners are usually family members or friends – often the patient's informal caregiver – who are knowledgeable about and usually accompany the participant to study visits. This study examines researchers’ perspectives on the role of study partners in dementia research.Methods:Qualitative data collection and analytic methods were used. Semi-structured individual interviews with principal investigators, study coordinators, and research nurses (i.e. researchers; n = 17) at two academic research sites were recorded, transcribed, and content analyzed to identify themes in the data.Results:According to researchers, study partners either make or help make research enrollment and post-enrollment decisions, serve as knowledgeable informants for the participants, manage the logistics that enable participants to comply with a study's protocol, and provide comfort and encouragement for the patient to engage in and complete a study. Researchers describe ideal qualities of study partners as being able to provide reliable information, being dependable and adherent to the protocol, and not expecting a benefit. They also report that study partners may face both practical and emotional challenges during research participation. However, researchers believe that study partners derive dementia-related education, caregiver support, and satisfaction from their involvement in research.Conclusions:Investigators, potential study partners, and institutional review boards should be aware of study partners’ research responsibilities, challenges, and their interests as caregivers.

scholarly journals The efficiency of single institutional review board review in National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Cooperative Reproductive Medicine Network–initiated clinical trials

2018 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
pp. 3-10 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael P Diamond ◽  
Esther Eisenberg ◽  
Hao Huang ◽  
Christos Coutifaris ◽  
Richard S Legro ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Child Health ◽  
Clinical Research ◽  
Human Development ◽  
Reproductive Medicine ◽  
Institutional Review Board ◽  
Institutional Review Boards ◽  
Institutional Review ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Review Boards

Background/aims: Timely review of research protocols by institutional review boards leads to more rapid initiation of clinical trials, which is critical to expeditious translation from bench to bedside. This observational study examined the impact of a single institutional review board on time and efforts required to initiate clinical trials by the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Cooperative Reproductive Medicine Network. Methods: Collection of data from the same six main clinical sites for three current clinical trials and two past clinical trials, including time from institutional review board submission to approval, pages submitted, consent form length, number of required attachments, other regulatory requirements, order of review at central or local sites, and language in documents at individual participating sites. Results from two past clinical trials were also included. Results: While time required for actual institutional review board submission’s review and initial approval was reduced with use of a single institutional review board for multicenter trials (from a mean of 66.7–24.0 days), total time was increased (to a mean of 111.2 or 123.3 days). In addition to single institutional review board approval, all institutions required local approval of some components (commonly consent language and use of local language), which varied considerably. The single institutional review board relied on local institutions for adding or removing personnel, conflict of interest review, and auditing of activities. Conclusion: A single institutional review board reduced time for initial review and approval of protocols and informed consents, although time for the entire process was increased, as individual institutions retained oversight of components of required regulatory review. In order to best achieve the National Institute of Health’s goals for improved efficiency in initiation and conduct of multisite clinical research, greater coordination with local institutional review boards is key to streamlining and accelerating initiation of multisite clinical research.

The Impact of Institutional Review Boards (IRBs) on Clinical Innovation

2015 ◽  
Vol 10 (5) ◽  
pp. 481-487 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tomasz P. Stryjewski ◽  
Brian T. Kalish ◽  
Benjamin Silverman ◽  
Lisa Soleymani Lehmann
Keyword(s):  
Institutional Review Boards ◽  
Institutional Review ◽  
Clinical Innovation ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Review Boards

Participation in Counseling: Does Family Matter? An Analysis of a Community Population

2007 ◽  
Vol 29 (3) ◽  
pp. 259-268 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dawn Stupak ◽  
Misty Hook ◽  
Diane Hall
Keyword(s):  
Research Training ◽  
Health Agency ◽  
Practice Research ◽  
Family Participation ◽  
North Texas ◽  
Chi Square ◽  
Non Profit ◽  
Community Mental Health Agency ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Family Matter

Premature termination from counseling is a significant problem for the field of counseling. In contrast to previous research on counseling dropout, in this study, the authors examined the impact of family participation and constellation as possible mediators.Archival data were collected from 113 client files at a non-profit community mental health agency in North Texas and chi square analyses were conducted. Results indicated that family participation was an important factor in counseling continuation. Implications for clinical practice, research, training, and public policy are discussed.

Rereading assent in critical literacy research with young children

2016 ◽  
Vol 18 (3) ◽  
pp. 396-427 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rebecca Rogers ◽  
Meredith Labadie
Keyword(s):  
Young Children ◽  
Critical Literacy ◽  
Meaning Making ◽  
Research Process ◽  
Institutional Review Boards ◽  
Institutional Review ◽  
Ethical Concept ◽  
Educative Process ◽  
The Right ◽  
Literacy Research

Literacy researchers often include young children in the research process. Yet discussions about the complexities of gaining and keeping assent are often missing in research reports. In this paper, we report on our attempts to make the assent process, a typical requirement for Institutional Review Boards, an educative experience for children in a critical literacy Kindergarten classroom. We asked: When assent is treated as a text to be read, revisited, interpreted and negotiated, what meanings are made by young children? We designed research lessons and collected artefacts of students’ learning, including interviews. Our analysis traced children’s developing recognition and critical analysis of concepts such as voluntary participation, understanding of procedures, confidentiality, benefits and risks of the study, and the right to ask questions. We found that when assent is treated as an educative process, particularly in the context of critical literacy education, young children learn and make meaning about their rights and responsibilities as participants. We present evidence of meaning-making, transfer and voluntariness of each ethical concept. Implications for literacy research with young children are discussed.

scholarly journals The Need for an Evidence-Based Encyclopaedia in Health Services Research in Pharmacy

2020 ◽  
Vol 17 (7) ◽  
pp. 2549 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zaheer-Ud-Din Babar
Keyword(s):  
Health Services Research ◽  
Health Services ◽  
Pharmacy Practice ◽  
Practice Research ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Global Level ◽  
Services Research ◽  
The Uk ◽  
The Impact

Pharmacy practice research (PPR) is a specialty field within the wider area of health services research and it focuses on studies of how and why people access pharmacy services. This stream of research is also referred to as more universally recognized term such as health services research in pharmacy. The health services research in pharmacy has increased manifold; however, the impact of this research is not visible at the global level. The editorial explains several issues on quality and quantity of evidence produced including how evidence produced could contribute to improve quality of care and patients’ health outcomes. It also narrates examples from the UK and Australia showing how health services research in pharmacy has made an impact on healthcare service delivery. The editorial argues that building an encyclopaedia in health services research in pharmacy is vital to enhance the visibility and impact of this research.

Qualitative Research in the Chinese Social Work Academy: Optimism and Invisible Disadvantages

2018 ◽  
Vol 49 (5) ◽  
pp. 1296-1316
Author(s):  
Yanfeng Xu ◽  
Corey Shdaimah ◽  
Fang Zhao ◽  
Deborah Gioia
Keyword(s):  
Qualitative Research ◽  
Social Work ◽  
Research Training ◽  
Institutional Review Boards ◽  
Early Developmental Stage ◽  
Structural Barriers ◽  
Social Work Research ◽  
Social Work Faculty ◽  
Methodological Challenges ◽  
Institutional Review

Abstract There has been much discussion about the contributions of qualitative research to social work knowledge, but the experiences of social work faculty engaged in qualitative research are rarely discussed. Social work is at the early developmental stage in China, which makes the country a useful laboratory to examine this question. The current study aimed to understand experiences of Chinese qualitative social work faculty and how their methodological orientation affected their career trajectories. Nine semi-structured, in-depth interviews were conducted and analysed. Thematic data analysis revealed three major themes: suitability, methodological challenges and structural barriers. Findings indicate that qualitative social work research has an optimistic future in China, but methodological challenges and structural barriers create invisible disadvantages. This study highlights the need for rigorous qualitative research training, including apprenticeship; translation of more qualitative learning materials into Chinese; and support for the purchase, training and use of qualitative software packages. The results also point to the need for institutional review boards or other ethical oversight mechanisms. More importantly, there must be greater consensus regarding what constitutes scientific rigour, which projects should be funded, what are evaluative criteria for publication, and whom to hire and promote.

Making Research Consent Forms Informative and Understandable: The Experience of the Indian Health Service

1994 ◽  
Vol 3 (4) ◽  
pp. 510-521 ◽  
Author(s):  
William L. Freeman
Keyword(s):  
Informed Consent ◽  
Health Service ◽  
American Indian ◽  
Alaska Native ◽  
Institutional Review Boards ◽  
Indian Health Service ◽  
Research Model ◽  
Consent Forms ◽  
Indian Health ◽  
Institutional Review

The mission of the Indian Health Service (IHS) affects what research is done and how It is reviewed and managed and in turn affects the forms and process used to obtain informed consent. Consent forms must be Informative and understandable to American Indian and Alaska Native (AI/AN) potential volunteers; the process used to obtain informed consent must minimize any institutional pressure to participate. The IHS Institutional Review Boards (IRBs) developed seven research Model Volunteer Consent Forms (available from the author).

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document