Impact of surgical resection of liver metastases on outcome of patients with KRAS-wildtype exon 2 (KRAS-wt) metastatic colorectal carcinoma (mCRC) treated with a cetuximab-based first-line therapy - Interim analysis of the German non-interventional study ERBITAG

579 Background: It is not clear whether Bevacizumab plus chemotherapy could improve the prognosis of mCRC patients with other RAS mutations beyond KRAS exon 2. Methods: The MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane databases, and Clinical Trials databases were reviewed to September 2015. The data of patients with KRAS exon 2 mutations was only available in FIRE3 study. So we could not perform the meta-analysis by KRAS exon 2 mutations. The data of patients with other RAS mutations beyond KRAS exon 2 were available in PEAK and FIRE3 studies. Hazard ratio (HR) was used to analyze the progressive-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Relative risk (RR) was used to analyze overall response rate (ORR). Results: Patients with other RAS mutations beyond KRAS exon 2 benefited from the addition of Bevacizumab. Bevacizumab + chemotherapy significantly improved the PFS compared with anti-EGFR moAb + chemotherapy (HR: 1.82, CI: 1.20–2.77, P =.005). The addition of Bevacizumab tended to improve ORR, though there is no significant difference (RR: 0.83, CI: 0.58–1.18, P =.288). But the OS tended to be shorter in Bevacizumab + chemotherapy arm than anti-EGFR moAb + chemotherapy arm without significant difference (HR: 0.72, CI: 0.25–2.05, P =.534). Conclusions: Patients with other RAS mutations beyond KRAS exon 2 could choose Bevacizumab plus chemotherapy as first-line therapy. But there is still no adequate evidence to reject or support the predictive value of RAS status in the effect of the addition of Bevacizumab. Moreover, which is the better primary endpoint, PFS or OS? Which is the better consequence of strategy, anti-EGFR moAb followed by Bevacizumab or Bevacizumab followed by anti-EGFR moAb? RCTs with large sample size comparing the efficacy of anti-VEGF moAb + chemotherapy and chemotherapy alone by RAS status as the first-line therapy in mCRC patients are required in the future.

Download Full-text

Fluorouracil, leucovorin and oxaliplatin (FLO) versus fluorouracil, leucovorin and cisplatin (FLP) as a first line therapy for patients with advanced gastric cancer; first interim analysis of a randomised multicenter phase II study

Journal of Clinical Oncology ◽

10.1200/jco.2005.23.16_suppl.4015 ◽

2005 ◽

Vol 23 (16_suppl) ◽

pp. 4015-4015 ◽

Cited By ~ 7

Author(s):

S.-E. Al-Batran ◽

J. Stöhlmacher ◽

S. Probst ◽

S. Hollerbach ◽

G. Wilhelm ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Gastric Cancer ◽

Advanced Gastric Cancer ◽

Phase Ii ◽

Interim Analysis ◽

Phase Ii Study ◽

First Line ◽

First Line Therapy ◽

Multicenter Phase ◽

Line Therapy

Download Full-text

Prospective biomarker validation trial evaluating the prognostic role of the combined expression of phospho-insulin growth factor receptor-1 and matrilysin in KRAS (exon 2) wild-type (WT) metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients treated with FOLFOX-6 plus panitumumab as first-line therapy [PULSE trial (GEMCAD 09-03)].

Journal of Clinical Oncology ◽

10.1200/jco.2016.34.4_suppl.583 ◽

2016 ◽

Vol 34 (4_suppl) ◽

pp. 583-583

Author(s):

Juan Maurel ◽

Carlos Fernandez-Martos ◽

Marta Martin-Richard ◽

Vicente Alonso ◽

Jose Carlos Mendez ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Clinical Trial ◽

Poor Prognosis ◽

Growth Factor Receptor ◽

First Line ◽

Exon 2 ◽

Insulin Growth Factor ◽

First Line Therapy ◽

Line Therapy ◽

Insulin Growth Factor Receptor ◽

Kras Exon

583 Background: Matrilysin can activate phospho-insulin growth factor receptor-1 (pIGF-1R) through IGFBP-3 degradation, releasing IGF-1. Matrilysin per se has shown poor prognosis in mCRC and the co-expression of matrilysin and pIGF-1R (double positivity, DP) correlates with poor prognosis in WT KRAS refractory patients (pts) treated with anti-EGFR in retrospective analyses. We performed a prospective clinical trial in WT KRAS (exon 2) pts, treated with FOLFOX plus panitumumab in first-line therapy to validate those findings. Methods: Positive cases were defined by immunohistochemistry as those with moderate or strong intensity (++/+++) and > 70% expression for both matrilysin and p-IGF-1R (antibody anti-pY1316). The primary end-point was progression-free survival (PFS). Seventy-eight pts and 56 events were required to have an 80% power to detect a difference in median PFS of 6 months (two-sided p< 0.05). Results: We screened 196 mCRC pts in 24 centers between Nov/2010 and Apr/2013 and 78 pts met inclusion criteria (42 non-DP and 36 DP). Median follow-up was 23 months. There were no differences in baseline characteristics [age, sex, liver metastases, lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) levels, performance status and BRAF mutational status] between both groups. There were no differences in the number of FOLFOX-6 and panitumumab cycles received. Cutaneous toxicity was more frequent in DP pts (p = 0.035). Response rate was 80.5% in non-DP and 72.2% in DP patients (p = 0.37). Median PFS (95% CI) was 7.4 months (95%CI 5.2-13.3) in non-DP and 9.6 months (95% CI 6.7-17.5, p = 0.15) in DP patients. Median overall survival was 19.8 months (11.5-26.3) in non-DP pts and 39.1 months (26-NE, p = 0.071) in DP pts. Adjusted HR for PFS was 0.68 (95% CI 0.41-1.12). Adjusted analysis for OS was 0.50 (95% CI 0.27-0.90). Conclusions: We found that co-expression of matrilysin and pIGF-1R is a novel strong prognostic biomarker of survival benefit in mCRC KRAS WT pts treated in first-line with FOLFOX-6 plus panitumumab. Clinical trial information: NCT01288339.

Download Full-text