Prospective biomarker validation trial evaluating the prognostic role of the combined expression of phospho-insulin growth factor receptor-1 and matrilysin in KRAS (exon 2) wild-type (WT) metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients treated with FOLFOX-6 plus panitumumab as first-line therapy [PULSE trial (GEMCAD 09-03)].

583 Background: Matrilysin can activate phospho-insulin growth factor receptor-1 (pIGF-1R) through IGFBP-3 degradation, releasing IGF-1. Matrilysin per se has shown poor prognosis in mCRC and the co-expression of matrilysin and pIGF-1R (double positivity, DP) correlates with poor prognosis in WT KRAS refractory patients (pts) treated with anti-EGFR in retrospective analyses. We performed a prospective clinical trial in WT KRAS (exon 2) pts, treated with FOLFOX plus panitumumab in first-line therapy to validate those findings. Methods: Positive cases were defined by immunohistochemistry as those with moderate or strong intensity (++/+++) and > 70% expression for both matrilysin and p-IGF-1R (antibody anti-pY1316). The primary end-point was progression-free survival (PFS). Seventy-eight pts and 56 events were required to have an 80% power to detect a difference in median PFS of 6 months (two-sided p< 0.05). Results: We screened 196 mCRC pts in 24 centers between Nov/2010 and Apr/2013 and 78 pts met inclusion criteria (42 non-DP and 36 DP). Median follow-up was 23 months. There were no differences in baseline characteristics [age, sex, liver metastases, lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) levels, performance status and BRAF mutational status] between both groups. There were no differences in the number of FOLFOX-6 and panitumumab cycles received. Cutaneous toxicity was more frequent in DP pts (p = 0.035). Response rate was 80.5% in non-DP and 72.2% in DP patients (p = 0.37). Median PFS (95% CI) was 7.4 months (95%CI 5.2-13.3) in non-DP and 9.6 months (95% CI 6.7-17.5, p = 0.15) in DP patients. Median overall survival was 19.8 months (11.5-26.3) in non-DP pts and 39.1 months (26-NE, p = 0.071) in DP pts. Adjusted HR for PFS was 0.68 (95% CI 0.41-1.12). Adjusted analysis for OS was 0.50 (95% CI 0.27-0.90). Conclusions: We found that co-expression of matrilysin and pIGF-1R is a novel strong prognostic biomarker of survival benefit in mCRC KRAS WT pts treated in first-line with FOLFOX-6 plus panitumumab. Clinical trial information: NCT01288339.

Download Full-text

Incidence and patterns of phospho insulin growth factor receptor-1 (pIGF-1R) and matrilysin (MMP7) expression in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), and correlation with KRAS status: A prospective evaluation in the PULSE trial—A GEMCAD study.

Journal of Clinical Oncology ◽

10.1200/jco.2012.30.15_suppl.e14041 ◽

2012 ◽

Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽

pp. e14041-e14041

Author(s):

Vicente Alonso ◽

Carlos Fernandez-Martos ◽

Marta Martin ◽

Antonieta Salud ◽

Jose Carlos Mendez ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Tumor Cells ◽

Growth Factor Receptor ◽

First Line ◽

Double Positive ◽

Exon 2 ◽

Insulin Growth Factor ◽

First Line Therapy ◽

Mutational Status ◽

Kras Status ◽

Insulin Growth Factor Receptor

e14041 Background: MMP7 can activate IGF-1R by IGF release due to IGFBP degradation. Activation of IGF-1R can contribute to EGFR resistance by transactivation. We previously described that concomitant expression of p-IGF-1R and MMP7 (Double positive; DP), correlates with poor prognosis, in KRAS WT patients (pts) treated with anti-EGFR compounds (Horndler el al, 2011). Therefore we designed a prospective clinical trial to validate DP as a marker of resistance in KRAS WT pts treated in first-line therapy with FOLFOX-6 plus panitumumab. Methods: mCRC pts in the ongoing prospective PULSE trial (NCT0128833) were prospectively evaluated for p-IGF-1R (p-1316), MMP7 expression and KRAS mutational status. Pts defined as DP should express MMP7 (++ or +++ intensity in >66% of tumor cells) and p-IGF-1R (++ or +++ intensity in >66% of tumor cells). KRAS pts with mutations at exon 2 were excluded. The study was designed to include 40 pts in the two groups (DP vs non-DP) to detect a Hazard ratio difference in PFS of <0.5 (DP vs non-DP) with 80% power. Results: From November 2010 to December 2011, 113 consecutive pts were screened from 24 Spanish Institutions. 54 KRAS WT (40 pts non-DP and 14 DP) have been included. The non-DP arm has being recently closed for inclusion, due to pre-planned complete accrual. Among DP pts, 27% were KRAS WT and 30% KRAS mutant; p=0.63. 48% of cases were positive for p-IGF-1R. Phospho-IGF-1R positive cases had different patterns of staining: peri-nuclear in 76%, 11% nuclear and only 13% membrane-apical staining. These patterns do not differ between KRAS WT; (n=70) and KRAS mutant pts (n=43) (p=0.60). Tumors with positive p-IGF-1R expression, independently of the pattern, have higher MMP7 co-expression (59%) compared with negative cases (13%) (p<0.0001). Conclusions: MMP7 contributes to activate IGF-1R pathway in pts with mCRC. Internalization of the activated IGF-1R, could explain in part, the lack of efficacy of IGF-1R inhibitors in mCRC clinical trials.

Download Full-text

Whether mCRC patients with other RAS mutations benefit from the addition of bevacizumab as first-line therapy.

Journal of Clinical Oncology ◽

10.1200/jco.2016.34.4_suppl.579 ◽

2016 ◽

Vol 34 (4_suppl) ◽

pp. 579-579

Author(s):

Mingyi Zhou ◽

Ping Yu ◽

Kezuo Hou ◽

Xiujuan Qu ◽

Yunpeng Liu ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Meta Analysis ◽

Large Sample Size ◽

First Line ◽

Exon 2 ◽

Ras Mutations ◽

First Line Therapy ◽

Line Therapy ◽

Significant Difference ◽

Ras Status ◽

Kras Exon

579 Background: It is not clear whether Bevacizumab plus chemotherapy could improve the prognosis of mCRC patients with other RAS mutations beyond KRAS exon 2. Methods: The MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane databases, and Clinical Trials databases were reviewed to September 2015. The data of patients with KRAS exon 2 mutations was only available in FIRE3 study. So we could not perform the meta-analysis by KRAS exon 2 mutations. The data of patients with other RAS mutations beyond KRAS exon 2 were available in PEAK and FIRE3 studies. Hazard ratio (HR) was used to analyze the progressive-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Relative risk (RR) was used to analyze overall response rate (ORR). Results: Patients with other RAS mutations beyond KRAS exon 2 benefited from the addition of Bevacizumab. Bevacizumab + chemotherapy significantly improved the PFS compared with anti-EGFR moAb + chemotherapy (HR: 1.82, CI: 1.20–2.77, P =.005). The addition of Bevacizumab tended to improve ORR, though there is no significant difference (RR: 0.83, CI: 0.58–1.18, P =.288). But the OS tended to be shorter in Bevacizumab + chemotherapy arm than anti-EGFR moAb + chemotherapy arm without significant difference (HR: 0.72, CI: 0.25–2.05, P =.534). Conclusions: Patients with other RAS mutations beyond KRAS exon 2 could choose Bevacizumab plus chemotherapy as first-line therapy. But there is still no adequate evidence to reject or support the predictive value of RAS status in the effect of the addition of Bevacizumab. Moreover, which is the better primary endpoint, PFS or OS? Which is the better consequence of strategy, anti-EGFR moAb followed by Bevacizumab or Bevacizumab followed by anti-EGFR moAb? RCTs with large sample size comparing the efficacy of anti-VEGF moAb + chemotherapy and chemotherapy alone by RAS status as the first-line therapy in mCRC patients are required in the future.

Download Full-text