The effect of anxiety on memory test performance

1989 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 126-126
Author(s):  
M.G. Mutchnick ◽  
J.M. Williams ◽  
G. Harter ◽  
I.J. Torres ◽  
C.K. Young
Keyword(s):  
2019 ◽  
Vol 22 ◽  
Author(s):  
María Abellán-Martínez ◽  
Miguel Ángel Castellanos López ◽  
María Luisa Delgado-Losada ◽  
Raquel Yubero ◽  
Nuria Paúl ◽  
...  

Abstract The ability to generate memory strategies is a key factor in performance of episodic memory tests. There is evidence about the inefficient use of memory strategies in old adults. However, a question remains unresolved: Worse performance on memory test in the older people is due to an inability to mobilize cognitive strategies or to an episodic memory deficit? In this study we tried to answer it by using the Test of Memory Strategies (TMS), which parametrically reduces the need of executive functions on memory tests. The test consists of five experimental conditions (TMS1–5) where a progressive external organization of the material reduces the need to mobilize memory strategies. TMS was applied to a sample of 180 participants (n = 180) divided into three age groups (25–45; 46–65; 66–85). The results showed an increased performance in all groups groups (F(2, 177) = 14.79, p < .001) across conditions (F(3.88,674.04) = 292.48, p < .001), without group differences in those conditions with a maximum reduction of the need of executive functions (F(7.61,674.04) = 1.95, p = .053). However, middle age and older adults showed more difficulties in establishing cognitive strategies, in the initial conditions. These results lead to the conclusion that the typical pattern of low performance on episodic memory tasks in the older population may be due to the deterioration of executive functions and not mainly to a primary decline of memory process.


2003 ◽  
Vol 44 (4) ◽  
pp. 355-361 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas Karlsson ◽  
Rolf Adolfsson ◽  
Arne Borjesson ◽  
Lars-Goran Nilsson

2017 ◽  
Vol 41 (S1) ◽  
pp. S107-S107
Author(s):  
J. De Jonghe ◽  
T. Schoemaker ◽  
D. Lam ◽  
P. Andre de la Porte

Background and aimsOver 50% of adult disability claimants fail some form of SVT. While some over report psychological, affective symptoms, others may report incredible cognitive symptoms. We examined effects of different types of response bias on free recall and self-reported depression.Participants and methods This is a single site cross-sectional study using a convenience sample (n = 224) of disability claimants in the Netherlands. The Green Word Memory Test (GWMT) was administered to all subjects. The Amsterdam Short Term Memory Test (AKTG), the Structured Inventory of Malingered. Symptomatology (SIMS), and the beck depression inventory (BDI-II) were administered in subsamples. Participant classification according to GWMT and SIMS outcomes resulted in four groups, G+/S+, G+/S−, G−/S+ and G−/S−.ResultsAverage age of the participants was 46.3 years (SD 9.9), 41.5% were female, and 43% were higher educated. GWMT was positive in 48.2% of all subjects, and 27.6% scored positive on both GWMT and SIMS. Analysis of variance of GWMT Free recall and Beck depression scores showed significant group differences [F(3, 123) = 33.21, P = .000] and [F(3, 106) = 25.17, P = .000] respectively.ConclusionsNon credible test performance was prevalent in this Dutch study of disability claimants. Insufficient effort and over reporting of psychological symptoms are associated with different score profiles on regular tests and self-rating scales.Disclosure of interestThe author receives funding for his work as a neuropsychologist in an expertise setting.


2003 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. 189-207 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul Green ◽  
Lloyd Flaro

2014 ◽  
Vol 56 (6) ◽  
pp. 453-460 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chalermsiri Theppitak ◽  
Viet Lai ◽  
Hiroyuki Izumi ◽  
Yoshiyuki Higuchi ◽  
Ganga Kumudini ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document