scholarly journals SDMinP: a program to control the family wise error rate using step-down minP adjusted P-values

2005 ◽  
Vol 21 (14) ◽  
pp. 3183-3184 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Obreiter ◽  
C. Fischer ◽  
J. Chang-Claude ◽  
L. Beckmann
2004 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-33 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mark J. van der Laan ◽  
Sandrine Dudoit ◽  
Katherine S. Pollard

The present article proposes two step-down multiple testing procedures for asymptotic control of the family-wise error rate (FWER): the first procedure is based on maxima of test statistics (step-down maxT), while the second relies on minima of unadjusted p-values (step-down minP). A key feature of our approach is the characterization and construction of a test statistics null distribution (rather than data generating null distribution) for deriving cut-offs for these test statistics (i.e., rejection regions) and the resulting adjusted p-values. For general null hypotheses, corresponding to submodels for the data generating distribution, we identify an asymptotic domination condition for a null distribution under which the step-down maxT and minP procedures asymptotically control the Type I error rate, for arbitrary data generating distributions, without the need for conditions such as subset pivotality. Inspired by this general characterization, we then propose as an explicit null distribution the asymptotic distribution of the vector of null value shifted and scaled test statistics. Step-down procedures based on consistent estimators of the null distribution are shown to also provide asymptotic control of the Type I error rate. A general bootstrap algorithm is supplied to conveniently obtain consistent estimators of the null distribution.


2016 ◽  
Vol 111 ◽  
pp. 32-40 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jens Stange ◽  
Thorsten Dickhaus ◽  
Arcadi Navarro ◽  
Daniel Schunk

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Bumrungsak Phuenaree ◽  
Suttinee Kaewtaworn

The purpose of this research was to compare the efficiency of single-step procedures and the step-down procedures in order to test for multiple comparison with a control group. Four tests; Dunnett test, Step-down Dunnett test, Bonferroni test and Bonferroni-Holm test, was considered. The performance of these tests was evaluated in terms of the family wise error rate, any-pair power and all-pairs power. A Monte Carlo simulation was performed with repeated 10,000 times. The results showed that the familywise error rate of all test statistics closed to the nominal level. The empirical power of step-down procedures were higher than the single-step procedures, and the step-down Dunnett test gave the highest power.


2007 ◽  
Vol 15 (4) ◽  
pp. 399-408 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexander Y. Gordon

2012 ◽  
Vol 32 (2) ◽  
pp. 181-195 ◽  
Author(s):  
Haihong Li ◽  
Abdul J. Sankoh ◽  
Ralph B. D'Agostino

2008 ◽  
Vol 27 (21) ◽  
pp. 4145-4160 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sonja Zehetmayer ◽  
Peter Bauer ◽  
Martin Posch

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document