scholarly journals Two-phase differential expression analysis for single cell RNA-seq

2018 ◽  
Vol 34 (19) ◽  
pp. 3340-3348 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhijin Wu ◽  
Yi Zhang ◽  
Michael L Stitzel ◽  
Hao Wu
Keyword(s):  
Single Cell ◽  
Differential Expression ◽  
Expression Analysis ◽  
Differential Expression Analysis ◽  
Rna Seq ◽  
Two Phase

scholarly journals Bias, robustness and scalability in differential expression analysis of single-cell RNA-seq data

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Charlotte Soneson ◽  
Mark D. Robinson
Keyword(s):  
Single Cell ◽  
Differential Expression ◽  
Statistical Methods ◽  
Expression Analysis ◽  
Method Development ◽  
Differential Expression Analysis ◽  
Data Sets ◽  
Rna Seq ◽  
Data Set ◽  
Extensive Evaluation

AbstractBackgroundAs single-cell RNA-seq (scRNA-seq) is becoming increasingly common, the amount of publicly available data grows rapidly, generating a useful resource for computational method development and extension of published results. Although processed data matrices are typically made available in public repositories, the procedure to obtain these varies widely between data sets, which may complicate reuse and cross-data set comparison. Moreover, while many statistical methods for performing differential expression analysis of scRNA-seq data are becoming available, their relative merits and the performance compared to methods developed for bulk RNA-seq data are not sufficiently well understood.ResultsWe present conquer, a collection of consistently processed, analysis-ready public single-cell RNA-seq data sets. Each data set has count and transcripts per million (TPM) estimates for genes and transcripts, as well as quality control and exploratory analysis reports. We use a subset of the data sets available in conquer to perform an extensive evaluation of the performance and characteristics of statistical methods for differential gene expression analysis, evaluating a total of 30 statistical approaches on both experimental and simulated scRNA-seq data.ConclusionsConsiderable differences are found between the methods in terms of the number and characteristics of the genes that are called differentially expressed. Pre-filtering of lowly expressed genes can have important effects on the results, particularly for some of the methods originally developed for analysis of bulk RNA-seq data. Generally, however, methods developed for bulk RNA-seq analysis do not perform notably worse than those developed specifically for scRNA-seq.

scholarly journals Valid post-clustering differential analysis for single-cell RNA-Seq

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jesse M. Zhang ◽  
Govinda M. Kamath ◽  
David N. Tse
Keyword(s):  
Single Cell ◽  
Differential Expression ◽  
Expression Analysis ◽  
State Of The Art ◽  
Differential Expression Analysis ◽  
Differential Analysis ◽  
Rna Seq ◽  
Analysis Framework ◽  
Link Type ◽  
False Discoveries

SummarySingle-cell computational pipelines involve two critical steps: organizing cells (clustering) and identifying the markers driving this organization (differential expression analysis). State-of-the-art pipelines perform differential analysis after clustering on the same dataset. We observe that because clustering forces separation, reusing the same dataset generates artificially low p-values and hence false discoveries. We introduce a valid post-clustering differential analysis framework which corrects for this problem. We provide software at https://github.com/jessemzhang/tn_test.

scholarly journals zingeR: unlocking RNA-seq tools for zero-inflation and single cell applications

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Koen Van den Berge ◽  
Charlotte Soneson ◽  
Michael I. Love ◽  
Mark D. Robinson ◽  
Lieven Clement
Keyword(s):  
Single Cell ◽  
Differential Expression ◽  
Expression Analysis ◽  
Negative Binomial ◽  
Differential Expression Analysis ◽  
Negative Binomial Model ◽  
Binomial Model ◽  
Rna Seq ◽  
Zero Inflation ◽  
Zero Counts

AbstractDropout in single cell RNA-seq (scRNA-seq) applications causes many transcripts to go undetected. It induces excess zero counts, which leads to power issues in differential expression (DE) analysis and has triggered the development of bespoke scRNA-seq DE tools that cope with zero-inflation. Recent evaluations, however, have shown that dedicated scRNA-seq tools provide no advantage compared to traditional bulk RNA-seq tools. We introduce zingeR, a zero-inflated negative binomial model that identifies excess zero counts and generates observation weights to unlock bulk RNA-seq pipelines for zero-inflation, boosting performance in scRNA-seq differential expression analysis.

scholarly journals Distribution-free complex hypothesis testing for single-cell RNA-seq differential expression analysis

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marine Gauthier ◽  
Denis Agniel ◽  
Rodolphe Thiébaut ◽  
Boris P. Hejblum
Keyword(s):  
Single Cell ◽  
Differential Expression ◽  
Expression Analysis ◽  
State Of The Art ◽  
Permutation Test ◽  
Differential Expression Analysis ◽  
Cumulative Distribution ◽  
Rna Seq ◽  
Distribution Free ◽  
Art Methods

State-of-the-art methods for single-cell RNA-seq (scRNA-seq) Differential Expression Analysis (DEA) often rely on strong distributional assumptions that are difficult to verify in practice. Furthermore, while the increasing complexity of clinical and biological single-cell studies calls for greater tool versatility, the majority of existing methods only tackle the comparison between two conditions. We propose a novel, distribution-free, and flexible approach to DEA for single-cell RNA-seq data. This new method, called ccdf, tests the association of each gene expression with one or many variables of interest (that can be either continuous or discrete), while potentially adjusting for additional covariates. To test such complex hypotheses, ccdf uses a conditional independence test relying on the conditional cumulative distribution function, estimated through multiple regressions. We provide the asymptotic distribution of the ccdf test statistic as well as a permutation test (when the number of observed cells is not sufficiently large). ccdf substantially expands the possibilities for scRNA-seq DEA studies: it obtains good statistical performance in various simulation scenarios considering complex experimental designs i.e. beyond the two condition comparison), while retaining competitive performance with state-of-the-art methods in a two-condition benchmark.

scholarly journals Individual Level Differential Expression Analysis for Single Cell RNA-seq data

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mengqi Zhang ◽  
Si Liu ◽  
Zhen Miao ◽  
Fang Han ◽  
Raphael Gottardo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Single Cell ◽  
Differential Expression ◽  
Expression Analysis ◽  
Differential Expression Analysis ◽  
Bulk Solution ◽  
Rna Seq ◽  
Cell Level ◽  
Individual Level ◽  
Level Data

Bulk RNA-seq data quantify the expression of a gene in an individual by one number (e.g., fragment count). In contrast, single cell RNA-seq (scRNA-seq) data provide much richer information: the distribution of gene expression across many cells. To assess differential expression across individuals using scRNA-seq data, a straightforward solution is to create ''pseudo'' bulk RNA-seq data by adding up the fragment counts of a gene across cells for each individual, and then apply methods designed for differential expression using bulk RNA-seq data. This pseudo-bulk solution reduces the distribution of gene expression across cells to a single number and thus loses a good amount of information. We propose to assess differential expression using the gene expression distribution measured by cell level data. We find denoising cell level data can substantially improve the power of this approach. We apply our method, named IDEAS (Individual level Differential Expression Analysis for scRNA-seq), to study the gene expression difference between autism subjects and controls. We find neurogranin-expressing neurons harbor a high proportion of differentially expressed genes, and ERBB signals in microglia are associated with autism.

scholarly journals Best practices on the differential expression analysis of multi-species RNA-seq

2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthew Chung ◽  
Vincent M. Bruno ◽  
David A. Rasko ◽  
Christina A. Cuomo ◽  
José F. Muñoz ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Best Practices ◽  
Differential Expression ◽  
Expression Analysis ◽  
Differential Expression Analysis ◽  
Single Species ◽  
Rna Seq ◽  
Species Analysis ◽  
Differential Gene ◽  
Multiple Species ◽  
Downstream Analysis

AbstractAdvances in transcriptome sequencing allow for simultaneous interrogation of differentially expressed genes from multiple species originating from a single RNA sample, termed dual or multi-species transcriptomics. Compared to single-species differential expression analysis, the design of multi-species differential expression experiments must account for the relative abundances of each organism of interest within the sample, often requiring enrichment methods and yielding differences in total read counts across samples. The analysis of multi-species transcriptomics datasets requires modifications to the alignment, quantification, and downstream analysis steps compared to the single-species analysis pipelines. We describe best practices for multi-species transcriptomics and differential gene expression.

scholarly journals The long and the short of it: unlocking nanopore long-read RNA sequencing data with short-read differential expression analysis tools

2021 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Xueyi Dong ◽  
Luyi Tian ◽  
Quentin Gouil ◽  
Hasaru Kariyawasam ◽  
Shian Su ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Differential Expression ◽  
Expression Analysis ◽  
Differential Expression Analysis ◽  
Transcriptomic Analysis ◽  
Statistical Testing ◽  
Rna Seq ◽  
Sequencing Data ◽  
Short Read ◽  
Sequencing Platform ◽  
Long Read

Abstract Application of Oxford Nanopore Technologies’ long-read sequencing platform to transcriptomic analysis is increasing in popularity. However, such analysis can be challenging due to the high sequence error and small library sizes, which decreases quantification accuracy and reduces power for statistical testing. Here, we report the analysis of two nanopore RNA-seq datasets with the goal of obtaining gene- and isoform-level differential expression information. A dataset of synthetic, spliced, spike-in RNAs (‘sequins’) as well as a mouse neural stem cell dataset from samples with a null mutation of the epigenetic regulator Smchd1 was analysed using a mix of long-read specific tools for preprocessing together with established short-read RNA-seq methods for downstream analysis. We used limma-voom to perform differential gene expression analysis, and the novel FLAMES pipeline to perform isoform identification and quantification, followed by DRIMSeq and limma-diffSplice (with stageR) to perform differential transcript usage analysis. We compared results from the sequins dataset to the ground truth, and results of the mouse dataset to a previous short-read study on equivalent samples. Overall, our work shows that transcriptomic analysis of long-read nanopore data using long-read specific preprocessing methods together with short-read differential expression methods and software that are already in wide use can yield meaningful results.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document