scholarly journals 1196 Sonographic Assessment Versus Direct Clinical Measurement of Sialolith Size and Its Influence on Modality of Endoscopic Removal

2021 ◽  
Vol 108 (Supplement_6) ◽  
Author(s):  
T Pepper ◽  
R Karia ◽  
F Ryba

Abstract Aim The aim of this retrospective case series was to investigate the influence of sialolith size on the potential for endoscopic stone removal. Method The records of 52 patients who underwent salivary endoscopy between September 2018 and February 2020 were reviewed. Included cases presented with at least one symptomatic major salivary gland, and sonographic or radiographic evidence of stone disease. Results A total of 25 patients (48%) and 27 stones were identified. These patients had a mean age of 45.2 years (range 16–72); 52% were female. Most cases (19/25) involved the submandibular gland, with a virtually even division between left and right sides. The overall success rate of sialendoscopic retrieval was 23/27 (85%), with 17/27 stones removed intact and 6/27 undergoing fragmentation with an intraoral salivary pneumatic lithotripter (Cook Medical). Median (sonographic) stone size in the largest dimension for those stones removed intact was 4mm (range 3-12mm), while for those undergoing fragmentation it was 7mm (range 3-11mm). Ultrasound provided an accurate assessment of stone size in most cases, but underestimated diameter by an average of 1mm in 6/27 cases, and overestimated size by 1mm in a single case. Conclusions Sialendoscopic stone retrieval is a minimally invasive and effective treatment for sialolithiasis. It is possible to remove most stones using a basket, with intraoral lithotripsy employed for larger stones. Ultrasound is a reliable diagnostic tool for predicting stone size but may underestimate size in a small proportion of cases.

2021 ◽  
Vol 108 (Supplement_6) ◽  
Author(s):  
R Karia ◽  
T Pepper ◽  
F Ryba

Abstract Introduction The aim of this retrospective case series was to investigate the therapeutic effectiveness of salivary endoscopy for non-stone related sialadenitis and obstructive symptoms. Method The records of 46 patients who underwent salivary endoscopy between September 2018 and December 2019 were reviewed. Included cases presented with at least one symptomatic major salivary gland, with no history or evidence of stone disease on clinical or radiologic examinations. Results A total of 22 patients (48%) and 26 glands were identified. These patients had a mean age of 50.8 years (range 27–74) and 73% were female. Most cases (19/26) involved the parotid gland. The primary imaging modality used was ultrasound, with sialography reserved for suspected strictures. The most common sonographic finding was ductal dilation (50%). Dexamethasone was instilled at completion of sialendoscopy in 23/26 cases. Outcomes included symptomatic improvement in 15/18 patients (4 patients have follow-up pending) with 5/15 experiencing complete symptom resolution. 2/18 patients did not have any symptomatic improvement, and 1/18 experienced acute infection that was treated with antibiotics. No patients required gland excision. Conclusions Salivary endoscopy is a minimally invasive and effective treatment for patients with non-stone sialadenitis that is refractory to conservative measures. Our review demonstrated 83% therapeutic benefit with gland preservation in all patients.


2016 ◽  
Vol 27 (1) ◽  
pp. 22-28
Author(s):  
Mahima Agrawal

Abstract Complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS) of the lower limb is a relatively uncommon entity as compared to CRPS of the upper extremity. Literature search has revealed only 2 retrospective case series and a single case report of lower extremity CRPS type I from 1975 to 2014 on Pubmed, isolated cases of CRPS type I of lower extremity have also been reported following knee surgeries and arthroscopies. This report presents a case of lower limb CRPS type I following blunt trauma to right foot, treatment of which was directed towards management of allodynia, vasomotor symptoms and surgical correction of deformity which had developed because of the disease, coping mechanisms were also reinforced through counselling and relaxation training. The individual responded well to treatment with a reported 75% reduction in the disabling symptoms and improvement in ambulatory status.


2021 ◽  
Vol 108 (Supplement_6) ◽  
Author(s):  
R Karia ◽  
T Pepper ◽  
F Ryba

Abstract Aim The aim of this retrospective case series was to investigate the success rate of sialendoscopic stone retrieval under local anaesthetic. Method The records of 52 patients who underwent salivary endoscopy between September 2018 and February 2020 were reviewed. Included cases presented with at least one symptomatic major salivary gland, and sonographic or radiographic evidence of stone disease. Results A total of 25 patients (48%) and 27 stones were identified. Most cases (19/25) involved the submandibular gland, with a virtually even division between left and right sides. 19/25 patients underwent stone retrieval under local anaesthetic (LA) in the first instance (two of these patients had two stones). 6/25 patients underwent stone retrieval under general anaesthetic (GA) in the first instance, and this was successful in 5/6 cases. The overall success rate of LA sialendoscopic stone retrieval was 18/21 (86%), with 14/21 stones (66%) being successfully removed at the first treatment session and a further four at the subsequent treatment session. Under LA, 13/18 stones were removed intact, while the remaining 5 underwent fragmentation with an intraoral salivary pneumatic lithotripter (Cook Medical). Conclusions Sialendoscopic stone retrieval is a minimally invasive and effective treatment for both submandibular and parotid duct stones. It is possible to remove most stones under local anaesthetic at the first treatment session, using intraoral lithotripsy as an adjunct when indicated. This treatment modality provides therapeutic benefit with 86% success of stone retrieval under local anaesthetic with gland preservation in the vast majority of patients.


2020 ◽  
Vol 173 ◽  
pp. 106163
Author(s):  
Malcolm Wilson ◽  
Bridget O'Connor ◽  
Nicholas Matigian ◽  
Geoffrey Eather

Author(s):  
Deepak A. V. ◽  
K. J. Jacob ◽  
Sumi P. Maria

Background: Peripartum hysterectomy is a life-saving procedure resorted to when conservative measures fail to control obstetric haemorrhage. Several predisposing factors, suboptimal care and lack of infrastructure may lead to this emergency procedure. We wanted to find out factors associated with peripartum hysterectomy and the adverse maternal outcomes at our centre.Methods: A retrospective case series analysis of 40 cases of peripartum hysterectomy performed over a period of 5 years from January 2010 to December 2014 at Government Medical College Hospital, Thrissur, Kerala was done.Results: The incidence of peripartum hysterectomy was 0.29%. The most common indication for peripartum hysterectomy was hysterectomy was uterine atony (50%). Thirty-five women (88%) were between 20 and 35 years. Most of the subjects were unbooked. There were two maternal deaths (case fatality rate of 5%) following peripartum hysterectomy during this period. All the subjects required blood transfusion.Conclusions: Prompt performance hysterectomy before the patient’s clinical condition deteriorates is the key to success. The incidence of adherent placenta is increasing, so every effort should be taken to reduce the caesarean section rates globally. 


Author(s):  
Ahmed Fathy Sadek ◽  
Ezzat Hassan Fouly ◽  
Ahmad Fouad Abdelbaki Allam ◽  
Alaa Zenhom Mahmoud

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document