scholarly journals P-P30 Outcomes from resection of pancreatic metastases and non-neuroendocrine, non-pancreatic tumours

2021 ◽  
Vol 108 (Supplement_9) ◽  
Author(s):  
Claire Stevens ◽  
Sirr Ling Chin ◽  
Dimitrios Karavios ◽  
Arjun Takhar ◽  
Ali Arshad ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Isolated metastatic disease within the pancreas is an uncommon finding. The potentially higher perioperative risk and low incidence of resectable metastases has limited the development of evidence based guidelines for pancreatic metastectomy. However, reports in the literature suggest a considered approach to resecting patients with limited disease, favourable tumour type and a significant disease free interval. The aim of this study was to examine the indications and outcomes of pancreatic resection for metastatic disease and non-pancreatic, non-neuroendocrine malignancy at a high-volume pancreatic surgery centre. Methods This is a retrospective analysis of a prospectively managed database of pancreatic resections for metastatic disease or primary non-pancreatic, non-neuroendocrine tumours at a single institution. Data collected and analysed included patient demographics, operative details and peri-operative outcomes, subsequent survival and mode of recurrence. Results Records of 711 patients who underwent pancreatic resection were examined. 21 consecutive patients met the inclusion criteria, representing 3% of the unit’s throughput. The perioperative morbidity and mortality were 33% and 0% respectively. Overall survival was 86months (95%CI 63-107) for renal cell carcinoma and 64months for other tumours. Conclusions When coupled with the low morbidity and mortality rates of a high-volume pancreatic surgery centre using careful patient selection, pancreatic metastectomy has the potential to result in good long-term survival. Recent improvement in the efficacy of systemic therapies, particularly for renal cell carcinoma and melanoma contribute to the utility of resection and to the improved survival of patients.

2014 ◽  
Vol 21 (12) ◽  
pp. 4007-4013 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. Schwarz ◽  
A. Sauvanet ◽  
N. Regenet ◽  
J. Y. Mabrut ◽  
J. F. Gigot ◽  
...  

2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 14532-14532
Author(s):  
J. S. Lam ◽  
R. H. Goel ◽  
A. J. Pantuck ◽  
R. A. Figlin ◽  
A. S. Belldegrun

14532 Background: Significant advances in the diagnosis, staging, and treatment of patients with renal cell carcinoma (RCC) during the last 2 decades have resulted in improved survival of a select group of patients and an overall change in the natural history of the disease. We describe the pathologic characteristics and long-term survival in patients treated for localized and metastatic RCC at a single tertiary care institution. Methods: Between 1990 and 2005, 1431 patients diagnosed with a renal mass underwent surgical resection and were evaluated for differences in clinicopathologic characteristics and survival based on the University of California-Los Angeles Integrated Staging System (UISS). Data were analyzed using standard statistical methods. Results: Following surgical resection, RCC was found in 1269 patients at pathologic evaluation. Of these patients, 473 had evidence of metastatic dissemination at time of surgery. The primary tumor in patients with metastatic disease was more likely to be clear cell (78.8% vs. 72.9%, p = 0.02), collecting duct (1.3% vs. 0.1%, p = 0.01), or undifferentiated (4.8% vs. 1.6%, p = 0.002) RCC, and less likely to be papillary (12.0% vs. 18.7%, p = 0.002) or chromophobe (3.1% vs. 6.7%, p = 0.006) RCC compared to patients with non-metastatic disease, respectively. The 2-year, 5-year, and 10-year survival was significantly higher in non-metastatic patients compared to patients with metastatic disease present at time of surgery (87.0% vs. 42.4%, 70.0 vs. 21.8%, 50.0% vs. 16.5%, p < 0.001, respectively). Conclusions: Over the last 15 years, patients with non-metastatic disease at the time of surgery have improved survival rates and are more likely to have papillary or chromophobe primary tumors than patients with metastatic disease. UISS stratification of patients with RCC provides a unique tool for risk assignment and outcome analysis to help determine follow-up regimens and eligibility for clinical trials. [Table: see text] No significant financial relationships to disclose.


2006 ◽  
Vol 175 (4S) ◽  
pp. 355-355
Author(s):  
Manuel Eisenberg ◽  
John S. Lam ◽  
Rakhee H. Goel ◽  
Allan J. Pantuck ◽  
Robert A. Figlin ◽  
...  

2010 ◽  
Vol 28 (4) ◽  
pp. 543-547 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael D. Staehler ◽  
Jessica Kruse ◽  
Nicolas Haseke ◽  
Thomas Stadler ◽  
Alexander Roosen ◽  
...  

2011 ◽  
Vol 9 (9) ◽  
pp. 985-993 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert Torrey ◽  
Philippe E. Spiess ◽  
Sumanta K. Pal ◽  
David Josephson

Both locally advanced and metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC) present a challenge in terms of their optimal management. This article reviews the literature and evaluates the role of surgery in the treatment of advanced RCC. Surgery is the optimal treatment for locally advanced RCC and minimal, resectable, metastatic disease. Patients with metastatic disease, and some forms of locally advanced disease, may also benefit from multimodal management with local surgical therapy and systemic treatment using either immunotherapy or targeted therapy. Regardless of the disease stage, patients with locally advanced or metastatic RCC represent heterogenous patient populations with different disease characteristics and risk factors. Individualization of care in the setting of a sound oncologic framework may optimize the risk/benefit ratio within individual patient cohorts.


2003 ◽  
Vol 10 (8) ◽  
pp. 922-926 ◽  
Author(s):  
Calvin H. L. Law ◽  
Alice C. Wei ◽  
Sherif S. Hanna ◽  
Mohamed Al-Zahrani ◽  
Bryce R. Taylor ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document