scholarly journals Deep brain stimulation modulates synchrony within spatially and spectrally distinct resting state networks in Parkinson’s disease

Brain ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 139 (5) ◽  
pp. 1482-1496 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ashwini Oswal ◽  
Martijn Beudel ◽  
Ludvic Zrinzo ◽  
Patricia Limousin ◽  
Marwan Hariz ◽  
...  
2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maria T. Gomes ◽  
Henrique M. Fernandes ◽  
Joana Cabral

ABSTRACTDeep brain stimulation (DBS) of the subthalamic nucleus (STN) is increasingly used for the treatment of Parkinson’s Disease (PD), but despite its success, the neural mechanisms behind this surgical procedure remain partly unclear. As one working hypothesis, it was proposed that DBS works by restoring the balance of the brain’s resting-state networks (RSNs), which is reported to be disrupted in people with PD. Hence, to elucidate the effects that STN-DBS induces on disseminated networks, we analyzed an fMRI dataset of 20 PD patients at rest under DBS ON and OFF conditions. Moving beyond ‘static’ functional connectivity studies, we employ a recently developed fMRI analysis tool, the Leading Eigenvector Dynamic Analysis (LEiDA), to characterize the recurrence of brain-wide phase-locking patterns overlapping with known RSNs. Here, STN-DBS seems to increase the Default Mode Network (DMN) occurrence in individuals with PD. Since the DMN is usually disturbed in PD patients presenting deficits in cognition, our observation might be suggestive that STN-DBS contributes to a normalization of the PD-induced cognitive impairment.Moreover, we addressed the effects of DBS lead placement on RSNs balance, considering the overlap between the DBS-induced electric field and 3 STN subsections. We found that the Visual Network (VN) probability of occurrence increased proportionally to the electric field-limbic STN overlap. Our finding might be indicative that stimulation of the limbic STN is related to the stabilization of visual symptoms sometimes presented by PD patients, which are usually accompanied by VN disruption.Overall, this study offers new insights into the fine-grained temporal dynamics of brain states portraying the effects of STN-DBS in patients with PD, while at the same time trying to pave the way to improved planning strategies for this surgical procedure.


Brain ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 137 (4) ◽  
pp. 1130-1144 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joshua Kahan ◽  
Maren Urner ◽  
Rosalyn Moran ◽  
Guillaume Flandin ◽  
Andre Marreiros ◽  
...  

2009 ◽  
Vol 36 (S 02) ◽  
Author(s):  
J Gierthmühlen ◽  
P Arning ◽  
G Wasner ◽  
A Binder ◽  
J Herzog ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
pp. 158-173

Background: Parkinson’s disease (PD) is a progressive neurodegenerative disorder caused by a dopamine deficiency that presents with motor symptoms. Visual disorders can occur concomitantly but are frequently overlooked. Deep brain stimulation (DBS) has been an effective treatment to improve tremors, stiffness and overall mobility, but little is known about its effects on the visual system. Case Report: A 75-year-old Caucasian male with PD presented with longstanding binocular diplopia. On baseline examination, the best-corrected visual acuity was 20/25 in each eye. On observation, he had noticeable tremors with an unsteady gait. Distance alternating cover test showed exophoria with a right hyperphoria. Near alternating cover test revealed a significantly larger exophoria accompanied by a reduced near point of convergence. Additional testing with a 24-2 Humphrey visual field and optical coherence tomography (OCT) of the nerve and macula were unremarkable. The patient underwent DBS implantation five weeks after initial examination, and the device was activated four weeks thereafter. At follow up, the patient still complained of intermittent diplopia. There was no significant change in the manifest refraction or prism correction. On observation, the patient had remarkably improved tremors with a steady gait. All parameters measured were unchanged. The patient was evaluated again seven months after device activation. Although vergence ranges at all distances were improved, the patient was still symptomatic for intermittent diplopia. OCT scans of the optic nerve showed borderline but symmetric thinning in each eye. All other parameters measured were unchanged. Conclusion: The case found no significant changes on ophthalmic examination after DBS implantation and activation in a patient with PD. To the best of the authors’ knowledge, there are no other cases in the literature that investigated the effects of DBS on the visual system pathway in a patient with PD before and after DBS implantation and activation.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document