Improved automated kinetic determination of uric acid in serum by use of uricase/catalase/aldehyde dehydrogenase.

1979 ◽  
Vol 25 (4) ◽  
pp. 619-621 ◽  
Author(s):  
K Bartl ◽  
M Brandhuber ◽  
J Ziegenhorn

Abstract The enzymatic determination of serum uric acid by use of uricase, catalase, and aldehyde dehydrogenase according to Haeckel [J. Clin. Chem. Clin Biochem. 14, 101 (1976)] showed interferences from ethanol-converting enzymes, which are present in some patients' sera. We have identified these enzymes as alcohol dehydrogenase isoenzymes. Among other substances, a mixture of pyrazole and oxalate can be used to eliminate these interferences. This inhibitor system gives good results when used in the automated kinetic uric acid determination, as is shown by a comparison with the manual assay for uric acid according to Kageyama [Clin. Chim. Acta 31, 421 (1971)].

1980 ◽  
Vol 26 (1) ◽  
pp. 178-178
Author(s):  
F Zoppi ◽  
D Fenili ◽  
S Marcovina ◽  
A Peracino

2008 ◽  
Vol 62 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Suling Feng ◽  
Xueping Liu

AbstractA novel kinetic spectrofluorimetric method for the determination of uric acid based on the activation effect of uric acid on the Cu(II) ion catalyzed oxidation of pyronine Y by hydrogen peroxide was developed. The influence of different buffer solutions was tested and the Britton-Robinson buffer solution with pH 2.2 was found to be the optimum. The detection limit and the linear range for uric acid are 0.09 μg mL−1 and 0.3–3.0 μg mL−1, respectively. The RSD for eleven determinations of 1.6 μg mL−1 uric acid was 1.6 %. Satisfactory results were obtained when using this method of uric acid determination in human urine.


1980 ◽  
Vol 26 (1) ◽  
pp. 178-178
Author(s):  
F Zoppi ◽  
D Fenili ◽  
S Marcovina ◽  
A Peracino

2018 ◽  
Vol 42 (18) ◽  
pp. 14796-14804 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiaohui Gao ◽  
Rijun Gui ◽  
Kendrick Qizhou Xu ◽  
Huijun Guo ◽  
Hui Jin ◽  
...  

A novel and facile ratiometric electrochemical sensor was developed for sensitive determination of uric acid.


1992 ◽  
Vol 38 (7) ◽  
pp. 1350-1352 ◽  
Author(s):  
Y Aoki ◽  
H Ihara ◽  
H Nakamura ◽  
T Aoki ◽  
M Yoshida

Abstract We examined the possible effect of different bilirubin species, including unconjugated (Bu), sugar-conjugated (Bc), and authentic delta bilirubin (Bd) isolated from serum, on the direct enzymatic measurement of uric acid by using the uricase (EC 1.7.3.3) and peroxidase (EC 1.11.1.7) coupled reaction. Bc, isolated from human bile, produced the most interference with uric acid determination. Although the presence of human serum albumin reduced interference by Bu and Bc, albumin-bound Bc complex still produced greater interference than Bu. Interference with the peroxidase reaction by Bc covalently bound to serum albumin (Bd) was less than that by Bu. We examined this phenomenon by using serum-isolated Bd obtained by ammonium sulfate precipitation and ultrafiltration and by using commercially available ditaurobilirubin (DTB) and chemically synthesized Bd (via Woodward's reagent, WBd) as surrogates for bile-isolated Bc and natural Bd, respectively. DTB produced the same amount of interference as natural Bc, but the interference produced by DTB in the presence of serum albumin was not the same as that produced by natural Bc with albumin. Our synthetic Bd appears to be a reliable surrogate for natural Bd in testing for bilirubin interference.


Molekul ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (3) ◽  
pp. 186
Author(s):  
Elvian Eka Krisnaniningrum ◽  
Ani Mulyasuryani ◽  
Hermin Sulistyarti

Arrowroot starch membrane-modified glassy carbon electrode were constructed for the determination of uric acid. The membrane consist of arrowroot starch, polyvinyl alcohol, uric acid, and crosslinker. The crosslinker used was sodium tripolyphosphate, citric acid, and glutaraldehyde. Carbon material was added to increase the sensitivity. The composition of membrane influences the electrodes sensitivity. The best composition of arrowroot starch membrane is UA1 using 0.1% uric acid in membrane and STPP as crosslinker. The linearity concentration, sensitivity, and detection limit were 100-500 µM, 0.0509 A/M and 76 µM, respectively.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document